A contractor of fast food giant failed to deliver the expected output of an inventory system upgrade. This resulted in more than 70 branches closing due to inventory problems. It comprised the sales for the month. What do you think were the potential opportunities opened up to other players in the fast food industry?

A contractor of fast food giant failed to deliver the expected output of an inventory system upgrade. This resulted in more than 70 branches closing due to inventory problems. It comprised the sales for the month. What do you think were the potential opportunities opened up to other players in the fast food industry?

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

ChapterC: Cases

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.7A: Avion, Inc. Susan Dey and Bill Mifflin, procurement managers at Avion, Inc., sat across from each...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
Avion, Inc. Susan Dey and Bill Mifflin, procurement managers at Avion, Inc., sat across from each other and reviewed a troubling performance report concerning a key supplier, Foster Technologies. The report detailed the deteriorating performance of Foster Technologies in the areas of material quality and on-time delivery. At this point, Kevin ODonnell, another procurement manager, entered the room. Why can changes within a supply chain disrupt the normal flow of goods and services within a supply chain?
A contractor of fast food giant failed to deliver the expected output of an inventory system upgrade. This resulted in more than 70 branches closing due to inventory problems. It compromised the sales for the month. What do you think were the potential opportunities opened up to other players in the fast food industry?
Kamal Fatehl, production ma nager of Kennesaw Manufacturing, finds his profit at $15,000 (as shown in the following statement)- inadequate for expanding his business. The bank isinsisting on an improved profit picture prior to approval of a loan for some new equipment. Kamal would like to improve the profit line to $25,000 so he can obtain the bank's approval for the loan. a) What percentage improvement is needed in a supply chain strategy for profit to improve to $25,000? What is the cost of material with a $25,000 profit?b) What percentage improvement is needed in a sales strategy for profit to improve to $25,000? What must sales be for profit to improve to $25,000?
A contractor of a fast food giant failed to deliver the expected output of an inventory systems upgrade. This resulted in more than 70 branches closing due to inventory problems. It compromised the sales for the month. What do you think were the potential opportunities opened up to other players in the fast food industry?
A contractor of fast food giant failed to deliver the expected output of an inventory systems upgrade. This resulted to more than 70 branches closing due to inventory problems. It compromised the sales for the month. What do you think were the potential opportunities opened up to other players in the fastfood industry?
Will the supply chain world remain chaotic this year, asks Supply Chain Dive (Feb. 22, 2022)? What about shortages, scarce materials, and delivery expectations? How should companies approach their supply chain strategy in 2022? Here are 7 trends suggested in a new ebook: TREND #1: LABOR SHORTAGE CONTINUES The first prediction for 2022 is that the labor shortage in supply chains will continue well into 2022. There’s no area of labor left unturned – be it labor planning, employee retention, labor efficiencies, or robotics. Every strategy and profit impact option must be rescoped. TREND #2: NEED FOR REAL-TIME VISIBILITY Companies are now recognizing the importance of real-time visibility in their supply chain. Disruptions are rampant and costs are soaring. Teams need to be more proactive in the way they handle their processes, people, and products. TREND #3: RISING VENDOR EXPECTATIONS Companies are starting to demand more from their vendors in terms of functionality,…
Will the supply chain world remain chaotic this year, asks Supply Chain Dive (Feb. 22, 2022)? What about shortages, scarce materials, and delivery expectations? How should companies approach their supply chain strategy in 2022? Here are 7 trends suggested in a new ebook: TREND #1: LABOR SHORTAGE CONTINUES The first prediction for 2022 is that the labor shortage in supply chains will continue well into 2022. There’s no area of labor left unturned – be it labor planning, employee retention, labor efficiencies, or robotics. Every strategy and profit impact option must be rescoped. TREND #2: NEED FOR REAL-TIME VISIBILITY Companies are now recognizing the importance of real-time visibility in their supply chain. Disruptions are rampant and costs are soaring. Teams need to be more proactive in the way they handle their processes, people, and products. TREND #3: RISING VENDOR EXPECTATIONS Companies are starting to demand more from their vendors in terms of functionality,…
Andrew Manufacturing held an average inventory of $1.2 million (raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods) last year. Its sales were $8.5 million, and its cost of goods sold was $5.7 million. The firm operates 260 days a year. What is the inventory days' supply? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to one decimal place. Inventory days' supply (IDS): days What target inventory level is necessary to reach a 30- and 10-day inventory days' supply during the next two years? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the nearest dollar. Target inventory level (30-day): $ Target inventory level (10-day): $
One of your Taiwanese suppliers has bid on a new line of molded plastic parts that is currently being assembled at your plant. The supplier has bid $0.10 per part, given a forecast you provided of 200,000 parts in year 1; 300,000 in year 2; and 500,000 in year 3. Shipping and handling of parts from the supplier’s factory is estimated at $0.01 per unit. Additional inventory handling charges should amount to $0.005 per unit. Finally, administrative costs are estimated at $20 per month. Although your plant is able to continue producing the part, the plant would need to invest in another molding machine, which would cost $10,000. Direct materials can be purchased for $0.05 per unit. Direct labor is estimated at $0.03 per unit plus a 50 percent surcharge for benefits; indirect labor is estimated at $0.011 per unit plus 50 percent benefits. Up-front engineering and design costs will amount to $30,000. Finally, management has insisted that overhead be allocated if the parts are made in-house…