A dean at a local college believes that a last name goes a long way and decides to conduct a study. Theybelieve that job applicants with easy to pronounce last names are just as likely to get called for aninterview than applicants with difficult to pronounce last names. 599 job applications were sent out withlast names that are easy to pronounce and 815 identical job applications were sent out with names thatwere difficult to pronounce. 469 of the "applicants" with easy to pronounce names were called for aninterview while 650 of the "applicants" with difficult to pronounce names were called for an interview.What can be concluded at the 0.01 level of significance?For this study, we should use Select an answera. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: Select an answer vSelect an answer vSelect an answer vH: Select an answer vSelect an answer vSelect an answer vb. The test statistic ? v =(please round your answer to 3 decimal places.)c. The p-value =(Please round your answer to 4 decimal places.)d. The p-value is ? vae. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence toconclude that among all possible applicants, there is a differnece in the population proportionof callbacks for applicants with easy to pronounce last names and applicants with difficult topronounce names.O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so we can conclude that the populationproportion of people with easy to pronounce names who get called for an interview is equal tothe population proportion of people with difficult to pronounce names who get called for aninterview.O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the proportion of the 599 applicants with easy to pronounce names who got called for aninterview is not the same as the proportion of the 815 applicants with difficult to pronouncenames who got called for an interview.O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat among all possible applicants, there is a differnece in the population proportion ofcallbacks for applicants with easy to pronounce last names and applicants with difficult topronounce names.

Name: A dean at a local college believes that a last name goes a long way a
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:00.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: A dean at a local college believes that a last name goes a long way and decides to conduct a study. Theybelieve that job applicants with easy to pronounce last names are just as likely to get called for aninterview than applicants with difficult to

Question

A dean at a local college believes that a last name goes a long way and decides to conduct a study. Theybelieve that job applicants with easy to pronounce last names are just as likely to get called for aninterview than applicants with difficult to pronounce last names. 599 job applications were sent out withlast names that are easy to pronounce and 815 identical job applications were sent out with names thatwere difficult to pronounce. 469 of the &#34;applicants&#34; with easy to pronounce names were called for aninterview while 650 of the &#34;applicants&#34; with difficult to pronounce names were called for an interview.What can be concluded at the 0.01 level of significance?For this study, we should use Select an answera. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: Select an answer vSelect an answer vSelect an answer vH: Select an answer vSelect an answer vSelect an answer vb. The test statistic ? v =(please round your answer to 3 decimal places.)c. The p-value =(Please round your answer to 4 decimal places.)d. The p-value is ? vae. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence toconclude that among all possible applicants, there is a differnece in the population proportionof callbacks for applicants with easy to pronounce last names and applicants with difficult topronounce names.O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so we can conclude that the populationproportion of people with easy to pronounce names who get called for an interview is equal tothe population proportion of people with difficult to pronounce names who get called for aninterview.O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the proportion of the 599 applicants with easy to pronounce names who got called for aninterview is not the same as the proportion of the 815 applicants with difficult to pronouncenames who got called for an interview.O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat among all possible applicants, there is a differnece in the population proportion ofcallbacks for applicants with easy to pronounce last names and applicants with difficult topronounce names.

Accepted Answer

Note : As per the guidelines, only first three sub-parts have been solved here.
Given data:
Number…