A government agency comes to the conclusion that it must use encryption in order to safeguard the communication that takes place between itself and its overseas counterparts. It is determined to design a proprietary cryptographic algorithm for this reason during a meeting with its counterparts, and this will be done in order to: Is there a justification for this choice. What risks are being taken?

A government agency comes to the conclusion that it must use encryption in order to safeguard the communication that takes place between itself and its overseas counterparts. It is determined to design a proprietary cryptographic algorithm for this reason during a meeting with its counterparts, and this will be done in order to: Is there a justification for this choice. What risks are being taken?

Management Of Information Security

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337405713

Author:WHITMAN, Michael.

Publisher:WHITMAN, Michael.

Chapter12: Protection Mechanisms

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 18RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A government organization decides that in order to protect the communications it has with its international partners, encryption is necessary. In a discussion with its equivalents, it is decided to develop a proprietary cryptographic algorithm for the following reasons: Is this decision supported by any evidence. What dangers are being exposed?
A government department decides it needs to use encryption to protect communication between itself and its international counterparts. At a meeting with its counterparts, it is decided to develop a proprietary cryptographic algorithm for this purpose. Is this decision justifiable? What risks are being taken?
Using asymmetric encryption methods, such as those found in public-key cryptography, is a prudent move that should be taken. The use of public keys within the realm of cryptography is proof of this fact.
In order to protect communications between itself and its abroad peers, a government agency decides to adopt encryption. During a discussion with its equivalents, it was decided to build a proprietary cryptographic algorithm in order to: Are there any reasons why this decision was made. What dangers are involved?
Is it feasible to produce secret keys for use in cryptographic protocols on a desktop computer using software in such a safe way that they can be utilised, and is it viable to do so on a desktop computer?
Is it feasible to produce secret keys for use in cryptographic protocols on a desktop computer using software in such a safe way that they can be utilized, and is this something that is even achievable?
A government agency determines that encryption is necessary to safeguard communication between itself and its overseas counterparts. It is agreed at a meeting with its rivals to create a proprietary encryption algorithm for this reason. Is this judgment justified? What dangers are being accepted?
Is it necessary to employ a large number of keys when developing public-key cryptography, or could a lesser number suffice?
Is it possible to encrypt not only the data but also the connection from starting point to finishing point? What are some of the benefits that come from acting in this manner? Could you give me an example of a circumstance when it would be beneficial to make use of encryption technology?
Using public-key cryptography or another kind of asymmetric encryption is a good idea. Proof of this may be seen in the use of public keys in cryptography.