A Lady (L) bought an item of Rs 100 from the Shopkeeper (C). She paid him through a 500 Rs Note. Realizing that he did not have change, the shopkeeper C got change for that note from another shopkeeper (S) and paid Rs 400 to the Lady. After a few days, S realized that the note is fake, And this railed at C and took 500 Rs back from him. So in this whole process how much money did C loose in the end?(computer science puzzle)

A Lady (L) bought an item of Rs 100 from the Shopkeeper (C). She paid him through a 500 Rs Note. Realizing that he did not have change, the shopkeeper C got change for that note from another shopkeeper (S) and paid Rs 400 to the Lady. After a few days, S realized that the note is fake, And this railed at C and took 500 Rs back from him. So in this whole process how much money did C loose in the end?(computer science puzzle)

Programming Logic & Design Comprehensive

9th Edition

ISBN:9781337669405

Author:FARRELL

Publisher:FARRELL

Chapter5: Looping

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3GZ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please answer the following question in depth with full detail. Consider the 8-puzzle that we discussed in class. Suppose we define a new heuristic function h3 which is the average of h1 and h2, and another heuristic function h4 which is the sum of h1 and h2. That is, for every state s ∈ S: h3(s) =h1(s) + h2(s) 2 h4(s) =h1(s) + h2(s) where h1 and h2 are defined as “the number of misplaced tiles”, and “the sum of the distances of the tiles from their goal positions”, respectively. Are h3 and h4 admissible? If admissible, compare their dominance with respect to h1 and h2, if not, provide a counterexample, i.e. a puzzle configuration where dominance does not hold.
If the levels of a factor (B) are not the same across the levels of a second factor (A) then factor B is said to be nested within factor A. True or false
In practical life, the employees get salaries and pay taxes honestly. Sometimes, the process of drawing salariesand payment of taxes may lead to some interesting situation. Suppose, a person draws salary of Rs. 10,000 permonth. A certain percentage of tax is charged on that amount, which is deducted every month. But if the salaryof the person is more than Rs. 10,000 per month, then the tax rate is different. Similarly if a person is getting Rs.20,000 per month, he/she would be charged more under a different tax rate slab. The interesting situationdevelops if there is an anomaly in the tax rates i.e. a person who is getting higher salary takes home lesser moneyas compared to the other person with less gross salary.To further elaborate it, we suppose that there is company 'C' where 100 or less than 100persons are employed. The salaries of the employees and their tax rates are known to us.We are required to list those unlucky persons, who are getting lesser take-home salary(net salary)…
H1. Compute the value of an European Call option at time 0 for the following parameters: strike, K = 120, maturity 1 year, σ = 0.15, S0 = 120 and interest rate, r = 0.02: (a) by implementing, using Python, R, C++ or Matlab, a binomial model where n = 100, 1000, or 10000. For each value of n compute the error (difference between option value obtained using the B-S model and the one from the binomial model). Compute ∆0.
In C++ Inventory.txt is given through the picture
The language we are using here is in Racket. Please try tying each of the following (car '(11 12 13 14)) (car '(a b c d)) (cdr '(11 12 13 14)) (cdr '(a b c d)) (car (11 12 13 14)) (cdr (a b c d)) What do car and cdr do? That last line of the above should cause an error. Explain why the single quote necessary and what it does.
In a prison, there is a door b/w any pair of adjacent cells and one exit guarded by a guard G. One prisoner is a maniac M which kills anybody he can see when he enters a cell. If M returns to the cell with his victim, then he loses consciousness and stops. In the evening all inmates and the guard went to sleep in their cells. In the morning, maniac M is gone and all other prisoners with the guard were found dead in their cells. Show the route of the maniac.
The definitions of "strict" and "loose" name equivalency are given.
Three prisoners have been sentenced to long terms in prison, but due to over crowed conditions, one prisoner must be released. The warden devises a scheme to determine which prisoner is to be released. He tells the prisoners that he will blindfold them and then paint a red dot or blue dot on each forehead. After he paints the dots, he will remove the blindfolds, and a prisoner should raise his hand if he sees at least one red dot on the other two prisoners. The first prisoner to identify the color of the dot on his own forehead will be release. Of course, the prisoners agree to this. (What do they have to lose?) The warden blindfolds the prisoners, as promised, and then paints a red dot on the foreheads of all three prisoners. He removes the blindfolds and, since each prisoner sees a red dot (in fact two red dots), each prisoner raises his hand. Some time passes when one of the prisoners exclaims, "I know what color my dot is! It's red!" This prisoner is then released. Your problem…
Three persons P1, P2, and P3 were invited by their friend F to make some smørbrød (sandwich made of bread, eggs, and tomato) together. To make a portion of smørbrød, three ingredients are needed: a slice of bread, a slice of tomato, and a slice of an egg. Each of these persons P1, P2, P3 has only one type of each of the ingredients: person P1 has slices of bread person P2 has slices of tomato; person P3 has slices of egg. We assume that persons P1, P2, and P3 each has an unlimited supply of these ingredients (i.e., slices of bread, slices of tomato, slices of egg), respectively. Their friend F, who invited them, also has an unlimited supply of all the ingredients. Here is what happens: the host F puts two random ingredients on the table. Then the invited person who has the third ingredient picks up these other two ingredients, and makes the smørbrød (i.e., takes a slice of bread, puts on it a slice of tomato, and puts on top a slice of egg), and then eats the smørbrød. The host of…
A robot moves into rooms R1 and R2 and switch the bulbs B1 and B2 on/off. The following are the action schema:1. goto(r, x1, x2) : robot r go to x2 from x12. switchON(s): switchON the bulb s3. switchOFF(s): switchOFF the bulb s 1. Write down preconditions and effects of the above actions. 2. Consider the following: (i) Initial state: < R1;R2;B1;B2 >: Robot is at Room R1 not in Room R2 and both bulbs are off.(ii) Goal state: < R2;B1;B2 >: Robot is at Room R2 and both bulbs are ON.Draw state space diagram for the above by drawing to all possible states.
Implement an algorithmic solution, indicating which states are valid and which are not, and model the space of the following problem: An interest group from a small town decided to sue a company for commercial abuse. For this, the people have organized themselves and decided to send 3 representatives, who will have to travel in a Van to the city where the lawsuit will be filed. The company to be sued, upon learning of these actions, has decided to send 3 lawyers to persuade the representatives, who will also travel in the same Van for that purpose. The community must file the class action suit under these conditions: - The three applicants must reach the destination city; - Only two people can travel per trip in the Van (small town - city, city - small town); - There can never be more lawyers than plaintiffs in any one place (either in the small town or city) because the lawyers can persuade the plaintiffs and as a consequence, the lawsuit would not be made; - The Van cannot be…