A. Monohybrid Cross Analyze your data from Exercise 2 (coin toss using 2 coins). Copy your results from there and write under the Observed column. H: There is no significant difference between the observed and expected phenotypic ratio. (3 tall:1 dwarf) H There is a significant difference between the observed and expected phenotypic ratio. Category Observed Expected (0) 47 (0-E) O-E (O-E) X* value Tall (E) 48 -1 1 0.021 Short 17 16 0.063 ТОTAL 64 0.084 DF Tabular X 3.841 Decision: Do not reject the null hypotheis. Conclusion: There is no sufficient evidence to reject the claim that there is no significant difference between the observed and expected ratio (3T:1).??? Do your data closely match Mendel's results? Why or why not?

Concepts of Biology
1st Edition
ISBN:9781938168116
Author:Samantha Fowler, Rebecca Roush, James Wise
Publisher:Samantha Fowler, Rebecca Roush, James Wise
Chapter8: Patterns Of Inheritance
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 5RQ: Imagine that you are performing a cross involving seed texture in garden pea plants. You cross...
icon
Related questions
Question

Do your data closely match Mendel’s results?  Why or why not?

A. Monohybrid Cross
Analyze your data from Exercise 2 (coin toss using 2 coins). Copy your results
from there and write under the Observed column.
Họ: There is no significant difference between the observed and expected
phenotypic ratio. (3 tall:1 dwarf)
H:There is a significant difference between the observed and expected
phenotypic ratio.
Category Observed Expected
(0)
47
(0-E)
X* value
O-E
(0-E)
(E)
48
Tall
-1
0.021
Short
17
16
1
0.063
TOTAL
64
0.084
DF
1
Tabular X
3.841
X'computed <Xub (>, <, =)
Decision: Do not reject the null hypotheis.
Conclusion: There is no sufficient evidence to reject the claim that there is no
significant difference between the observed and expected ratio (3T:1t).???
Do your data closely match Mendel's results? Why or why not?
Transcribed Image Text:A. Monohybrid Cross Analyze your data from Exercise 2 (coin toss using 2 coins). Copy your results from there and write under the Observed column. Họ: There is no significant difference between the observed and expected phenotypic ratio. (3 tall:1 dwarf) H:There is a significant difference between the observed and expected phenotypic ratio. Category Observed Expected (0) 47 (0-E) X* value O-E (0-E) (E) 48 Tall -1 0.021 Short 17 16 1 0.063 TOTAL 64 0.084 DF 1 Tabular X 3.841 X'computed <Xub (>, <, =) Decision: Do not reject the null hypotheis. Conclusion: There is no sufficient evidence to reject the claim that there is no significant difference between the observed and expected ratio (3T:1t).??? Do your data closely match Mendel's results? Why or why not?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Genomic studies
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Concepts of Biology
Concepts of Biology
Biology
ISBN:
9781938168116
Author:
Samantha Fowler, Rebecca Roush, James Wise
Publisher:
OpenStax College