Taken together, the two sources best support which oh the following conclusions regarding the situation in British India in 1940? Taken together, the two sources best support which of the followingconclusions regarding the situation in British India in 1940? *1 pointSource 1:"The British... have for many decades had settled notions about India's future. Their concept of partygovernment and parliamentary rule has become the ideal with them as the best form of government for everycountry. ...It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to understand the real nature of Islam andHinduism. It is only a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality. Thismisconception of one Indian nation will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. TheHindus and Muslims in India belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, literatures..They have different epics and different heroes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other. To yoketogether two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, mustlead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be built up for the government of sucha state."Muhammad Ali Jinnah, leader of the All-India Muslim League, anorganization of Indian Muslims that had split from the Indian NationalCongress, address to a meeting of the League, March 1940Source 2:"We, the inhabitants of India, have one thing in common and that is our India-ness, which we share despiteour religious and cultural differences. Just as our different features and personalities do not affect ourcommon humanity, so our religious and cultural differences should not interfere with our shared associationwith our homeland. Therefore, like other religious groups in India, we Muslims have a duty to struggle forthe attainment of our common Indian interests and fight against the evils that hamper our common progressand prosperity. This is what I mean when I speak of a common nationhood of all Indians. The [IndianNational] Congress, having the same position as ours, has made provisions for the protection of all religions,cultures, and languages in a future Indian state.On the other hand, the European concept of nationalism is unacceptable to our organization. We denounce itand are totally against it."Husain Ahmad Madani, leader of the Council of Indian Muslim ReligiousScholars, address to the annual meeting of the organization, June 1940There was a clear difference between Hindu and Muslim visions of what postwarIndia should beIndian Muslim religious scholars rejected Gandhi's emphasis on nonviolence toachieve political changeIndian opposition to British rule involved groups pursuing very different political goalsThe British skillfully manipulated religious tensions within India to rally support for theimperial war effort

Question

Taken together, the two sources best support which oh the following conclusions regarding the situation in British India in 1940? Taken together, the two sources best support which of the followingconclusions regarding the situation in British India in 1940? *1 pointSource 1:&#34;The British... have for many decades had settled notions about India's future. Their concept of partygovernment and parliamentary rule has become the ideal with them as the best form of government for everycountry. ...It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to understand the real nature of Islam andHinduism. It is only a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality. Thismisconception of one Indian nation will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. TheHindus and Muslims in India belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, literatures..They have different epics and different heroes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other. To yoketogether two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, mustlead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be built up for the government of sucha state.&#34;Muhammad Ali Jinnah, leader of the All-India Muslim League, anorganization of Indian Muslims that had split from the Indian NationalCongress, address to a meeting of the League, March 1940Source 2:&#34;We, the inhabitants of India, have one thing in common and that is our India-ness, which we share despiteour religious and cultural differences. Just as our different features and personalities do not affect ourcommon humanity, so our religious and cultural differences should not interfere with our shared associationwith our homeland. Therefore, like other religious groups in India, we Muslims have a duty to struggle forthe attainment of our common Indian interests and fight against the evils that hamper our common progressand prosperity. This is what I mean when I speak of a common nationhood of all Indians. The [IndianNational] Congress, having the same position as ours, has made provisions for the protection of all religions,cultures, and languages in a future Indian state.On the other hand, the European concept of nationalism is unacceptable to our organization. We denounce itand are totally against it.&#34;Husain Ahmad Madani, leader of the Council of Indian Muslim ReligiousScholars, address to the annual meeting of the organization, June 1940There was a clear difference between Hindu and Muslim visions of what postwarIndia should beIndian Muslim religious scholars rejected Gandhi's emphasis on nonviolence toachieve political changeIndian opposition to British rule involved groups pursuing very different political goalsThe British skillfully manipulated religious tensions within India to rally support for theimperial war effort

Accepted Answer

The British set force in India after they established the East India Company and decided to make a…

aken together, the two sources best support which oh the following conclusions regarding the situation in British India in 1940?

Expert Answers to Latest Homework Questions