also have some confuse for the decision: system B is more beneficial then system A due to lower negative NPV from system A. Should we need compare with negative NPV or cost per year? For negative NPV, system A ($541,843)is lower negative NPV than system B($706,984.82). On the other hand, system B ($167,116.14) is lower cost of each year than system A ($174,652.85). Thank you ~

also have some confuse for the decision: system B is more beneficial then system A due to lower negative NPV from system A. Should we need compare with negative NPV or cost per year? For negative NPV, system A ($541,843)is lower negative NPV than system B($706,984.82). On the other hand, system B ($167,116.14) is lower cost of each year than system A ($174,652.85). Thank you ~

Principles of Accounting Volume 2

19th Edition

ISBN:9781947172609

Author:OpenStax

Publisher:OpenStax

Chapter3: Cost-volume-profit Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3TP: As a manager, you have to choose between two options for new production equipment. Machine A will...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Hudson Corporation is considering three options for managing its data warehouse: continuing with its own staff, hiring an outside vendor to do the managing, or using a combination of its own staff and an outside vendor. The cost of the operation depends on future demand. The annual cost of each option (in thousands of dollars) depends on demand as follows: If the demand probabilities are 0.2, 0.5, and 0.3, which decision alternative will minimize the expected cost of the data warehouse? What is the expected annual cost associated with that recommendation? Construct a risk profile for the optimal decision in part (a). What is the probability of the cost exceeding $700,000?
I don’t understand this. Last year [year 1], we decided to drop our highest-end Red model and only produce the Yellow and Green models, because the cost system indicated we were losing money on Red. Now, looking at the preliminary numbers, our profit is actually lower than last year and it looks like Yellow has become a money loser, even though our prices, volumes, and direct costs are the same. Can someone please explain this to me and maybe help me decide what to do next year? Robert Dolan President & CEO Dolan Products Dolan Products is a small, family-owned audio component manufacturer. Several years ago, the company decided to concentrate on only three models, which were sold under many brand names to electronic retailers and mass-market discount stores. For internal purposes, the company uses the product names Red, Yellow, and Green to refer to the three components. Data on the three models and selected costs follow. Year 1 Red Yellow Green Total Units…
I don’t understand this. Last year [year 1], we decided to drop our highest-end Red model and only produce the Yellow and Green models, because the cost system indicated we were losing money on Red. Now, looking at the preliminary numbers, our profit is actually lower than last year and it looks like Yellow has become a money loser, even though our prices, volumes, and direct costs are the same. Can someone please explain this to me and maybe help me decide what to do next year? Robert Dolan President & CEO Dolan Products Dolan Products is a small, family-owned audio component manufacturer. Several years ago, the company decided to concentrate on only three models, which were sold under many brand names to electronic retailers and mass-market discount stores. For internal purposes, the company uses the product names Red, Yellow, and Green to refer to the three components. Data on the three models and selected costs follow. Year 1 Red Yellow Green Total Units…
I don’t understand this. Last year [year 1], we decided to drop our highest-end Red model and only produce the Yellow and Green models, because the cost system indicated we were losing money on Red. Now, looking at the preliminary numbers, our profit is actually lower than last year and it looks like Yellow has become a money loser, even though our prices, volumes, and direct costs are the same. Can someone please explain this to me and maybe help me decide what to do next year? Robert Dolan President & CEO Dolan Products Dolan Products is a small, family-owned audio component manufacturer. Several years ago, the company decided to concentrate on only three models, which were sold under many brand names to electronic retailers and mass-market discount stores. For internal purposes, the company uses the product names Red, Yellow, and Green to refer to the three components. Data on the three models and selected costs follow. Year 1 Red Yellow Green Total Units produced and…
how can the changes below affect Mirabel’s overall cost structure. For those changes that are controllable, make a recommendation considering the uncontrollable cost changes. Be certain to consider not only the company’s break-even point, but also the desired margin of safety. If Mirabel purchases the new equipment for $1,200,000, it will increase fixed costs by 10% but will decrease the variable cost per unit for all 3 models by 5%. If Mirabel invests the additional $650,000 in fixed marketing expenses, sales of the Model 301 are expected to increase by 8%. If the projection is that sales will increase by 10% in the coming year. The sales volume remains fixed but there is a 5% increase in variable expenses (materials cost) for the Model 101 and 301, and a 10% increase in variable expenses for Model 201.
How much would be the net effect on the total segment profit if product B is dropped and discontinued? Assume that by dropping product B, product A would increase A's sales by 80%. How much would be the net effect on the total segment profit? Assume that by dropping product B, product A would decrease A's sales by 20%. Moreover, 30,000 of common costs allocated are avoidable. How much would be the net effect on the total segment profit?
Ignore income taxes and other costs not mentioned in exhibit 1 or in the question itself. Market research estimates that monthly volume could increase to 3,500 units, which is well within hoist production capacity limitations, if the price were cut from $4,350 to $3,850 per unit. assuming the cost behavior patterns implied by the data in exhibit 1 are correct, would you recommend that this action be taken? What would be the impact on monthly sales, costs, and income?
A manufacturing firm is considering two mutually exclusive projects. Both projects have an economic service life of one year with no salvage value. The first cost or Project 1 is $1,000, and the first cost or Project 2 is $800. The net year-end revenue for each project is given as follows: Assume that both projects are statistically independent or each other.(a) If you make decisions by maximizing the expected NPW, which projectwould you select?(b) If you also consider the variance of the projects, which project would youselect?
The president believes it would be a mistake to change the unit selling price. Instead, he wants to use less costly raw materials, thereby reducing unit cost by 70 cents. How many units would have to be sold next year to earn target profit of $30,200?
A manager is trying to decide whether to buy one machine or two. If only one machine is purchased and demand proves to be excessive, the second machine can be purchased later. Some sales would be lost, however, because the lead time for delivery of this type of machine is 6 months. In addition, the cost per machine will be lower if both machines are purchased at the same time. The probability of low demand is estimated to be 0.30 and that of high demand to be 0.70. The after-tax NPV of the benefits from purchasing two machines together is $90,000 if demand is low and $170,000 if demand is high. If one machine is purchased and demand is low, the NPV is $120,000. If demand is high, the manager has three options: (1) doing nothing, which has an NPV of $120,000; (2) subcontracting, with an NPV of $140,000; and (3) buying the second machine, with an NPV of $130,000. a. Draw a decision tree for this problem. b. What is the best decision and what is its expected payoff?
A manager is trying to decide whether to buy one machine or two. If only one machine is purchased and demand proves to be excessive, the second machine can be purchased later. Some sales would be lost, however, because the lead time for delivery of this type of machine is six months. In addition, the cost per machine will be lower if both machines are purchased at the same time. The probability of low demand is estimated to be 0.20 and that of high demand to be 0.80. The after-tax NPV of the benefits from purchasing two machines together is $70,000 if demand is low and $170,000 if demand is high. If one machine is purchased and demand is low, the NPV is $100,000. If demand is high, the manager has three options: (1) doing nothing, which has an NPV of $100,000; (2) subcontracting, with an NPV of $140,000; and (3) buying the second machine, with an NPV of $120,000. What is the best decision and what is its expected payoff? Best decision is to buy nothing…
Boxer Production, Inc., is in the process of considering a flexible manufacturing system that will help the company react more swiftly to customer needs. The controller, Mick Morrell, estimated that the system will have a 10-year life and a required return of 10% with a net present value of negative $500,000. Nevertheless, he acknowledges that he did not quantify the potential sales increases that might result from this improvement on the issue of on-time delivery, because it was too difficult to quantify. If there is a general agreement that qualitative factors may offer an additional net cash flow of $150,000 per year, how should Boxer proceed with this Investment?