Armando consumes two goods: grapes and wine. He can purchase both at the market and also possesses a technology that allows him to costlessly convert any quantity of grapes into the same number of units of wine. This technology is not reversible: there is no quantity of wine that he can convert to grapes. Thus, for example, if he purchases 4 units of grapes and 3 units of wine, he could consume any bundle (4-s,3+ s) with s € [0, 4]. Armando's utility from consuming a units of grapes and y units of wine is u(x, y) = x²y. For each of the following questions, you may use, without proof, any results from the lectures for this course.

Armando consumes two goods: grapes and wine. He can purchase both at the market and also possesses a technology that allows him to costlessly convert any quantity of grapes into the same number of units of wine. This technology is not reversible: there is no quantity of wine that he can convert to grapes. Thus, for example, if he purchases 4 units of grapes and 3 units of wine, he could consume any bundle (4-s,3+ s) with s € [0, 4]. Armando's utility from consuming a units of grapes and y units of wine is u(x, y) = x²y. For each of the following questions, you may use, without proof, any results from the lectures for this course.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter4: Utility Maximization And Choice

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4.2P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Megan is a college student who consumes food and transportation. Last year, she consumed 90 meals and purchased 100 gallons of gasoline per month. Suppose that last year the price of a meal was $5 and the price of a gallon of gasoline was $2.23. However, this year, the price of a meal is $6 and the price of a gallon of gasoline is $3.92. As a result, Megan consumes 100 meals and 80 gallons of gasoline. For this example, assume Megan's utility this year is the same as her utility last year (and that her preferences have not changed). Calculate a Laspeyres cost-of-living index for Megan using 100 as the base for last year. In particular, the Laspeyres index for this year is nothing. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)
Suppose that each week Fiona buys 16 peaches and 4 apples at her local farmer's market. Both kinds of fruit cost $1 each. From this we can infer that: If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be greater than her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. Fiona is not maximizing her utility. If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be equal to her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. The law of diminishing marginal utility does not hold for Fiona.
Bart and Lisa are both optimizing consumers in the market for shirts and hats, where they pay $100 for a shirt and $50 for a hat. Bart buys 8 shirts and 4 hats, while Lisa buys 6 shirts and 12 hats. From this information, ignoring the minus sign, we can infer that Bart's marginal rate of substiution is _________ hats per shirt, while Lisa's is __________ hat's per shirt
John likes Coca-Cola. After consuming one Coke, John has a total utility of 10 utils. After two Cokes, he has a total utility of 25 utils. After three Cokes, he has a total utility of 50 utils. Does John show diminishing marginal utility for Coke, or does he show increasing marginal utility for Coke? Supposethat John has $3 in his pocket. If Cokes cost $1 each and John is willing to spend one of his dollars on purchasing a first can of Coke, would he spend his second dollar on a Coke, too? What about the third dollar? If John’s marginal utility for Coke keeps on increasing no matter how many Cokes he drinks, would it be fair to say that he is addicted to Coke?
Consider an economy composed of 16 consumers. Of these, 5 consumers each own one right shoe and 11 consumers each own one left shoe. Shoes are indivisible. Everyone has the same utility function, which is Min(2R, L}, where R and L are, respectively, the quantities of right and left shoes con sumed. A) (10%) Is the status quo (where each individual has his own shoe) Pareto efficient? If so, briefly explain why. If not, provide a Pareto improvement b) (10%) Characterize all Pareto efficient allocations
An individual is faced with a choice of buying housing in one of two markets; the private market where he may buy any amount of housing he pleases at the going price, and the public housing market where he will be offered, on a take-it-or-leave-it-basis, a particular amount of housing at a price lower than that which he would pay for it on the private market. Will he necessarily choose the public housing? If so, may we conclude that he will consume more housing than he would have purchased had he been forced to buy it on the private market? (With thanks to Dr Leslie Rosenthal.)
If marlow obtained 9 units of utility per dollar spent on apples and 6 units of utility per dollar spent on oranges, then Marlowe
The table below shows Martha’s total utility from burgers and pasta. Suppose that the price of a burger is $4, the price of pasta is $8 a dish, and Martha has $24 a week to spend. Quantity of Burger per week Total utility for Burger MU MU/P Quantity of Dishes Pasta per week Total utility for Pasta MU MU/P 0 0 0 0 1 10 1 20 2 18 2 36 3 25 3 48 4 31 4 56 5 36 5 60 6 40 6 62 a- Conclude whether or not we follow the law of diminishing MU. b- What is optimal combination of Burger and Pasta?
Given an individual’s current consumption patterns, we know that the person is consuming in such a manner that he is maximizing his satisfaction. Given a decrease in the price of one of the goods he normally purchases, what will happen to the consumer’s total satisfaction and to the marginal utilities connected with the consumption of this particular good. a) His overall satisfaction will increase, but his satisfaction from the last unit consumed of the good with a decreased price will decrease. b) His overall satisfaction will decrease and his satisfaction from the last unit consumed of the good with a decreased price will decrease. c) His overall satisfaction will increase and his satisfaction from the last unit consumed of the good with a decreased price will increase. d) His overall satisfaction will decrease and his satisfaction from the last unit consumed of the good with a decreased price will increase. e) We cannot tell about the changes in his total utility or his marginal…
Lexicographic preferences describe preferences where an economic agent prefers any amount of one good (X) to any amount of another (Y). SpeciÖcally, if o§ered several bundles of goods, the agent will choose the bundle that o§ers the most X, no matter how much Y there is. Only when there is a tie between bundles with regard to the number of units of X will the agent start comparing the number of units of Y across bundles. Show that Lexicographic preferences are transitive
True or false with reasoning: 1) _______When we claim that utility can be ordinally measured, we assume that the consumer is able to measure the total and marginal utility received when one extra unit of a commodity is consumed. 2)_______If MRS between two goods is constant, then having more of one good without having more of the other does not increase utility. 3)_______Marginal Utility increases until total utility is at a maximum and then marginal utility decreases.
John likes Coca-Cola. After consuming one Coke, John has a total utility of 10 utils. After two Cokes, he has a total utility of 25 utils. After three Cokes, he has a total utility of 50 utils. Does John show diminishing marginal utility for Coke or does he show increasing marginal utility for Coke? Suppose that John has $3 in his pocket. If Cokes cost $1 each and John is willing to spend one of his dollars on purchasing a first can of Coke, would he spend his second dollar on a Coke, too? What about the third dollar? If John’s marginal utility for Coke keeps on increasing no matter how many Cokes he drinks, would it be fair to say that he is addicted to Coke? *use tables and/or graphs if possible, please original work