Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. - 0.513 <, -P2 0.753 (Round to three decimal places as needed.)

b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. - 0.513 <, -P2 0.753 (Round to three decimal places as needed.)

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.4: Distributions Of Data
Problem 19PFA
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
HW3 please help with section B
Treatment Sham Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. 25 25 n 0.53 0.41 0.67 1.47 a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? O A. H: H1 <H2 Họ: H = H2 OD. Ho: H *H2 H: <H2 OC. Hg: H = H2 The test statistic, t, is 0.37. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The P-value is 0.356 . (Round to three decimal places as needed.) State the conclusion for the test. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger? Since the sample mean for those treated with magnets is greater than the sample mean for those given a sham treatment, it is valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger. b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. - 0.513 < 4, - H2 * 0.753 (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
Transcribed Image Text:Treatment Sham Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. 25 25 n 0.53 0.41 0.67 1.47 a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? O A. H: H1 <H2 Họ: H = H2 OD. Ho: H *H2 H: <H2 OC. Hg: H = H2 The test statistic, t, is 0.37. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The P-value is 0.356 . (Round to three decimal places as needed.) State the conclusion for the test. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger? Since the sample mean for those treated with magnets is greater than the sample mean for those given a sham treatment, it is valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger. b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. - 0.513 < 4, - H2 * 0.753 (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Indefinite Integral
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS