Because proof-of-work incurs a lot of expenses on electricity, network, and cooling, etc. which do not seem to produce any benefit other than the maintaining the operation of the blockchain, Ethereum has proposed an alternative "mining" implementation known as "proof-of-stake" to replace its current POW design, where the amount of "ethers" held is used as "stake". Based on your understanding of POW, which of the following does NOT seem to be a necessary feature in a POS implementation? The next block producer will be randomly selected from candidates The more ethers a candidate stakes, the higher chance it will be selected as the next block producer A candidate block producer cannot use its staked ethers for some time (or forever) At any time, the candidate block producer with the most staked ether always gets selected as the next block producer
Because proof-of-work incurs a lot of expenses on electricity, network, and cooling, etc. which do not seem to produce any benefit other than the maintaining the operation of the blockchain, Ethereum has proposed an alternative "mining" implementation known as "proof-of-stake" to replace its current POW design, where the amount of "ethers" held is used as "stake". Based on your understanding of POW, which of the following does NOT seem to be a necessary feature in a POS implementation? The next block producer will be randomly selected from candidates The more ethers a candidate stakes, the higher chance it will be selected as the next block producer A candidate block producer cannot use its staked ethers for some time (or forever) At any time, the candidate block producer with the most staked ether always gets selected as the next block producer
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
4th Edition
ISBN:9780534380588
Author:Wayne L. Winston
Publisher:Wayne L. Winston
Chapter11: Nonlinear Programming
Section11.13: Pareto Optimality And Tradeoff Curves
Problem 5P
Related questions
Question
Because proof-of-work incurs a lot of expenses on electricity, network, and cooling, etc. which do not seem to produce any benefit other than the maintaining the operation of the blockchain, Ethereum has proposed an alternative "mining" implementation known as "proof-of-stake" to replace its current POW design, where the amount of "ethers" held is used as "stake". Based on your understanding of POW, which of the following does NOT seem to be a necessary feature in a POS implementation?
- The next block producer will be randomly selected from candidates
- The more ethers a candidate stakes, the higher chance it will be selected as the next block producer
- A candidate block producer cannot use its staked ethers for some time (or forever)
- At any time, the candidate block producer with the most staked ether always gets selected as the next block producer
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780534380588
Author:
Wayne L. Winston
Publisher:
Brooks Cole
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780534380588
Author:
Wayne L. Winston
Publisher:
Brooks Cole