Bruno is a landowner and Angela is a farmer who pays a share of her grain output to Bruno for the use of the land. The figure shows Angela and Bruno's feasible frontier, Angela's biological survival constraint and her reservation indifference curve. Currently, if Angela does not work she receives a ration of 2.5 bushels from the government. Of the four depicted in the figure, which allocation strictly Pareto dominates Z? Angela's biological survival constraint Angela's reservation indifference curve 12. (c) Feasible frontier: Angela and Bruno combined (b). (d) (a) 2.5++ Z: Angela's reservation option 0. 24 Angela's hours of free time (a) b. (b) a. с. (с) d. (d) N Bushels of grain

Bruno is a landowner and Angela is a farmer who pays a share of her grain output to Bruno for the use of the land. The figure shows Angela and Bruno's feasible frontier, Angela's biological survival constraint and her reservation indifference curve. Currently, if Angela does not work she receives a ration of 2.5 bushels from the government. Of the four depicted in the figure, which allocation strictly Pareto dominates Z? Angela's biological survival constraint Angela's reservation indifference curve 12. (c) Feasible frontier: Angela and Bruno combined (b). (d) (a) 2.5++ Z: Angela's reservation option 0. 24 Angela's hours of free time (a) b. (b) a. с. (с) d. (d) N Bushels of grain

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter13: General Equilibrium And Welfare

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13.13P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A fixed amount of a good has to be allocated between two individuals, h = 1; 2 with utility functions Where xh is the amount of the good allocated to consumer h. a. How should be allocated to maximize a utilitarian SWF? Illustrate the answer graphically. How do the optimal values of x1 and x2 change among the cases a1 2, a1 = a2, and a1 > a2? b. What is the allocation maximizing the Bernoulli-Nash SWF ? Illustrate graphically. How do the optimal values of x1 and x2 change with the preference parameters a1 and a2? c. What is the allocation maximizing the maxim in-Rawlins SWF? Illustrate graphically. How does the allocation change with preference parameters a1 and a2?
The production possibility frontier for X and Y consists of all the efficient allocations in the Edgeworth box. Explain why this is so. Also explain why inefficient points in the box would be inside the production possibility frontier.
Amy and Lela have following preferences for apples, pears and bananas where > means "preferred to." Amy: apple > pear > banana Lela: banana > apple > pear Assume there is one apple, one banana and one pear to divide between Amy and Lela and that they have no other goods. For each of the following allocations, say whether it is (Pareto) efficient or inefficient. 1. Amy gets the apple and the pear and Lela gets the banana [ Select ] ["Efficient", "Inefficient"] 2. Amy gets the banana and Lela gets the apple and the pear [ Select ] ["Efficient", "Inefficient"] 3. Amy gets the pear, apple and banana and Lela gets nothing [ Select ] ["Efficient", "Inefficient"]
Show and explain how the distribution/allocation constraints are satisfied by any point in an Edgeworth-box diagram.
The allocation where D1, D2, D3, D4, and D8 consume and S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 sell is not Pareto efficient because... (hint: you can prove that an allocation is not Pareto Efficient by showing that there's a better way to allocate the widget. Which of the following choices is better (more efficient) than the proposed allocation where D1, D2, D3, D4, and D8 consume and S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 sell?) Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Two individuals, Fred and Helen, are in an economy with no production, and each have the utility function U = 10XY. Prices of both X and Y are set at $1. Initial endowments for Fred are 10 units of X and 6 units of Y. Helen has 8 units of X and 12 units of Y. Find the general equilibrium prices and allocation, then show that the G.E. allocation is Pareto efficient.
Consider the figure attached which shows the combined production function of Anna and Bob.Suppose Government has introduced a new social welfare program to cater to the poor of the society, wherein the reservation wage increases from 2 bushels of wheat to 6 bushels of wheat. Draw a new diagram to show the impact of this welfare program and comment on who do you think would benefit from this intervention? Additionally, does the outcome of this intervention results in an allocation which is a pareto efficient one? Explain your reasoning. (Make sure your diagram is fully labelled)
Consider two people in the market for tilapia, Reagan and Cheryl. The marginal benefit curves for both individuals are shown in the accompanying graph. a. Suppose the market price of tilapia is $2.00 per pound. Move point A to Cheryl’s quantity purchased. Move point B to Reagan’s quantity purchased. b. How many pounds of tilapia do they collectively purchase? _________ pounds c. To achieve an efficient allocation, Cheryl should purchase _______(more tilapia than, the same amount of tilapia as, less tilapia than) she is currently purchasing, and Reagan should purchase ________ (more tilapia than, the same amount of tilapia as, less tilapia than) she is currently purchasing.
Consider a pure exchange economy, where each consumer has preferences described by a Cobb-Douglas utility function. Both consumers have exactly the same endowment. In such an economy, an equitable distribution of goods (where each individual consumes exactly half of each good) is a Walrasian equilibrium allocation? a. always, for any consumers' preferences b. only if consumers' preferences are exactly the same c. Never d. None of the above
Consider an Edgeworth box economy, where preferences and endowments are given by. ( attached below ) In the following, use the normalization p2 = 1.(a) Find all the Pareto optimal allocations (use x1 to parameterize thePO allocations). (b) Suppose the government wants individual 1 to have the bundle x1 = (5, 9). Show whether the government can induce this outcome an equilib- rium with transfers. Find the supporting prices and transfers if possible. (c) State the Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare and explain how the result in part (b) relates to that theorem. (d) Suppose the government does not care what bundle individual 1 gets and only wants to ensure that the individual 1 receives utility level equal to 45. Show whether this can be achieved as an equilibrium with transfers. Find the supporting prices and transfers if possible.
1. Consider allocations b-f (meaning points a, b, and f). Which allocations(s) A. are better for Ross than “a” (ignoring Rosa)? B. are better for Rosa than “a” (ignoring Ross)? C. are worse for both Ross and Rosa than “a”? D. are better for both Ross and Rosa than “a”? E. are Pareto superior to “a”?
Weel explained answer needed no Ai The Coase Theorem states that: a) As long as property rights are well defined and no transaction costs exist, an efficient allocation will result b)As long as property rights are well defined and transaction costs are high, an efficient allocation will result. c)An efficient allocation will be equitable to all parties concerned. d)Property rights should initially be assigned to those affected by a negative externality.