Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 $ 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 240,000 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000 90,000 2 26,000 90,000 3 6,000 70,000 4 6,000 70,000 5 (44,000) 20,000 20,000 340,000 Proposal C: $108,000 1 $ 33,400 55,000 2 31,400 53,000 3 28,400 50,000 4 25,400 47,000 5 23,400 45,000 142,000 250,000 Proposal D: $400,000 1 $ 100,000 180,000 2 100,000 180,000 100,000 180,000 3 80,000 160,000 80,000 160,000 4 20,000 100,000 20,000 100,000 5 0 80,000 300,000 700,000 The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals. Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20% 1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833 2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694 3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579 4 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482 5 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402 6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335 7 0.665 0.513 0.452 0.376 0.279 8 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.327 0.233 9 0.592 0.424 0.361 0.284 0.194 10 0.558 0.386 0.322 0.247 0.162 Required: 1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals. Cash Payback Period Proposal A Proposal B Proposal C Proposal D 2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. If required, round your answers to one decimal place. Average Rate of Return Proposal A % Proposal B % Proposal C % Proposal D % 3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2) by placing the calculated amounts in the first two columns on the left and indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 $ 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 240,000 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000 90,000 2 26,000 90,000 3 6,000 70,000 4 6,000 70,000 5 (44,000) 20,000 20,000 340,000 Proposal C: $108,000 1 $ 33,400 55,000 2 31,400 53,000 3 28,400 50,000 4 25,400 47,000 5 23,400 45,000 142,000 250,000 Proposal D: $400,000 1 $ 100,000 180,000 2 100,000 180,000 100,000 180,000 3 80,000 160,000 80,000 160,000 4 20,000 100,000 20,000 100,000 5 0 80,000 300,000 700,000 The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals. Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20% 1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833 2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694 3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579 4 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482 5 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402 6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335 7 0.665 0.513 0.452 0.376 0.279 8 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.327 0.233 9 0.592 0.424 0.361 0.284 0.194 10 0.558 0.386 0.322 0.247 0.162 Required: 1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals. Cash Payback Period Proposal A Proposal B Proposal C Proposal D 2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. If required, round your answers to one decimal place. Average Rate of Return Proposal A % Proposal B % Proposal C % Proposal D % 3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2) by placing the calculated amounts in the first two columns on the left and indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.

Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305961883

Author:Carl Warren

Publisher:Carl Warren

Chapter15: Capital Investment Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.6.8P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals

Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows:

	Investment	Year	Operating Income	Net Cash Flow
Proposal A:	$680,000	1	$ 64,000	$ 200,000
		2	$ 64,000	200,000
		3	64,000	200,000
		4	24,000	160,000
		5	24,000	160,000
			240,000	920,000
Proposal B:	$320,000	1	$ 26,000	90,000
		2	26,000	90,000
		3	6,000	70,000
		4	6,000	70,000
		5	(44,000)	20,000
			20,000	340,000
Proposal C:	$108,000	1	$ 33,400	55,000
		2	31,400	53,000
		3	28,400	50,000
		4	25,400	47,000
		5	23,400	45,000
			142,000	250,000
Proposal D:	$400,000	1	$ 100,000	180,000
2	100,000	180,000	100,000	180,000
3	80,000	160,000	80,000	160,000
4	20,000	100,000	20,000	100,000
5			0	80,000
			300,000	700,000

The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals.

Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest
Year	6%	10%	12%	15%	20%
1	0.943	0.909	0.893	0.870	0.833
2	0.890	0.826	0.797	0.756	0.694
3	0.840	0.751	0.712	0.658	0.579
4	0.792	0.683	0.636	0.572	0.482
5	0.747	0.621	0.567	0.497	0.402
6	0.705	0.564	0.507	0.432	0.335
7	0.665	0.513	0.452	0.376	0.279
8	0.627	0.467	0.404	0.327	0.233
9	0.592	0.424	0.361	0.284	0.194
10	0.558	0.386	0.322	0.247	0.162

Required:

1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals.

	Cash Payback Period
Proposal A
Proposal B
Proposal C
Proposal D

2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.

	Average Rate of Return
Proposal A	%
Proposal B	%
Proposal C	%
Proposal D	%

3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2) by placing the calculated amounts in the first two columns on the left and indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.

Proposal	Cash Payback Period	Average Rate of Return	Accept or Reject
A		%
B		%
C		%
D		%

4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 15% and the present value of $1 table above. Round to the nearest dollar.

Select the proposal accepted for further analysis.
Present value of net cash flow total	$	$
Less amount to be invested
Net present value	$	$

5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). If required, round your answers to two decimal places.

Select proposal to compute Present value index.
Present value index (rounded)

6. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present values of net cash flows computed in part (4).

Rank 1st
Rank 2nd

7. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present value indexes computed in part (5).

Rank 1st
Rank 2nd

8. The analysis indicates that although Proposal______________ has the larger net present value, it is not as attractive as Proposal _________________ in terms of the amount of present value per dollar invested. Proposal _____________ requires the larger investment. Thus, management should use investment resources for Proposal ___________ before investing in Proposal_______________ , absent any other qualitative considerations that may impact the decision.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.