Not graded homework question COFFEE (Millions of pounds)32282400PPF41FreedoniaA8 12 16 20 24LEMONS (Millions of pounds)28 32(?COFFEE (Millions of pounds)32282400PPF4Desonia24 28 328 122016LEMONS (Millions of pounds)Freedonia has a comparative advantage in the production of, while Desonia has a comparative advantage in theproduction ofSuppose that Freedonia and Desonia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has amillion pounds of coffee and million pounds ofcomparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total oflemons.Suppose that Freedonia and Desonia agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparativeadvantage. The countries decide to exchange 12 million pounds of lemons for 12 million pounds of coffee. This ratio of goods is known as the price oftrade between Freedonia and Desonia.The following graph shows the same PPF for Freedonia as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A. Place a black point (plus symbol) on the Homework (Ch 03)The following graph shows the same PPF for Freedonia as before, as well as its initial consumptiongraph to indicate Freedonia's consumption after trade.Note: Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes.COFFEE (Millions of pounds)3228241603242824TrueFreedonia8121620LEMONS (Millions of pounds)4FalseThe following graph shows the same PPF for Desonia as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A.As you did for Freedonia, place a black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate Desonia's consumption after trade.Desonia281216LEMONS (Millions of pounds)2832+32Consumption After Tradet point A. Place a black point (plus symbol) on the?+Consumption After TradeTrue or False: Without engaging in international trade, Freedonia and Desonia would not have been able to consume at the after-trade consumptionbundles. (Hint: Base this question on the answers you previously entered on this page.)

Given that the countries Freedonia and Desonia are producing lemons and coffees (in millions of…

COFFEE (Millions of pounds) 32 28 24 20 0 0 PPF 4 Freedonia 8 12 16 20 24 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) 28 32 COFFEE (Millions of pounds) 32 28 24 20 0 0 PPF 4 1 Freedonia has a comparative advantage in the production of production of comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of lemons. Desonial 8 12 16 20 24 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) 28 32 while Desonia has a comparative advantage in the Suppose that Freedonia and Desonia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a million pounds of coffee and million pounds of

COFFEE (Millions of pounds) 32 28 24 20 0 0 PPF 4 Freedonia 8 12 16 20 24 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) 28 32 COFFEE (Millions of pounds) 32 28 24 20 0 0 PPF 4 1 Freedonia has a comparative advantage in the production of production of comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of lemons. Desonial 8 12 16 20 24 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) 28 32 while Desonia has a comparative advantage in the Suppose that Freedonia and Desonia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a million pounds of coffee and million pounds of

Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971509

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter9: Application: International Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CQQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Are differences in geography behind the differences in absolute advantages?
In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of rubber or radios? How can you tell? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 80 additional radios in Japan and in Malaysia. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine,) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of radios? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 10 additional tons of rubber in Japan and in Malaysia. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing rubber? In this example, does each country have an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage in the same good? In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize?
How does comparative advantage lead to gains from trade?
What factors does Paul Krugman identity that supported expanding international trade in the 1800s?
Table 33.15 shows how the average costs of production for semiconductors (the chips In computer memories) change as the quantity of semiconductors built at that factory increases. Based on these data, sketch a curve with quantity produced on the horizontal axis and average cost of production on the vertical axis. How does the curve illustrate economies of scale? If the equilibrium quantity of semiconductors demanded is 90,000, can this economy take full advantage of economies of scale? What about if quantity demanded is 70,000 semiconductors? 50,000 semiconductors? 30,000 semiconductors? Explain how international trade could make it possible for even a small economy to take full advantage of economies of scale, while also benefiting from competition and the variety offered by several producers.
Is it possible to have a comparative advantage in the production of a good but not to have an absolute advantage? Explain.
How can there be any economic gains for a country from both importing and exporting the same good, like cars?
Can a nations comparative advantage change over time? What factors would make it change?