Consider an investor with initial wealth yo, who maximizes his expected utility from final wealth, Eu()]. This investor can invest in two a risky securities, 1 and 2, with random return 1 and 2. Those risky returns are two binomial variables, perfectly correlated. More specifically, with probability p we have ₁ = r and 2 =r+6, and with probability 1-p we have ₁ = 0 and ₂ = -8, where r > 0 and 6 > 0. We assume that this investor has log preferences, that is u(y) = log(y). 1. For a given fraction, a, of the initial wealth, invested in risky security 2, what is the distribution of final wealth, i? 2. Determine the expression of E[u(1)] as a function of a. 3. Explain why there is an upper bound and a lower bound for a, and determine those bounds. 4. Determine the optimal fraction a*. 5. When p = 0.5, describe qualitatively the optimal investment strategy. Does it make sense?

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter7: Uncertainty
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 7.9P
icon
Related questions
Question

part 3 4 5

Consider an investor with initial wealth yo, who maximizes his expected utility from final
wealth, E[u()]. This investor can invest in two a risky securities, 1 and 2, with random
return ři and ř2. Those risky returns are two binomial variables, perfectly correlated. More
specifically, with probability p we have ř =r and r, = r+ô, and with probability 1- p we
have î = 0 and ř2 = -6, where r> 0 and ổ > 0.
We assume that this investor has log preferences, that is
u(y) = log(y).
1. For a given fraction, a, of the initial wealth, invested in risky security 2, what is the
distribution of final wealth, g1?
2. Determine the expression of Elu(1)] as a function of a.
3. Explain why there is an upper bound and a lower bound for a, and determine those
bounds.
4. Determine the optimal fraction a*.
5. When p =
0.5, describe qualitatively the optimal investment strategy. Does it make
sense?
Transcribed Image Text:Consider an investor with initial wealth yo, who maximizes his expected utility from final wealth, E[u()]. This investor can invest in two a risky securities, 1 and 2, with random return ři and ř2. Those risky returns are two binomial variables, perfectly correlated. More specifically, with probability p we have ř =r and r, = r+ô, and with probability 1- p we have î = 0 and ř2 = -6, where r> 0 and ổ > 0. We assume that this investor has log preferences, that is u(y) = log(y). 1. For a given fraction, a, of the initial wealth, invested in risky security 2, what is the distribution of final wealth, g1? 2. Determine the expression of Elu(1)] as a function of a. 3. Explain why there is an upper bound and a lower bound for a, and determine those bounds. 4. Determine the optimal fraction a*. 5. When p = 0.5, describe qualitatively the optimal investment strategy. Does it make sense?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 7 steps with 28 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Risk Aversion
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage