Consider the case of innovating vaccines without patents (in a perfectly competitive market) (a) Does an externality exist? If so, is it positive/negative (or both) (b) Use Coase’s framework to identify the cause of the externality (c) If an externality exists, determine whether the Coase theorem applies (i.e. is it feasible to assign property rights and solve the problem?) (d) If an externality exists and the Coase theorem does not apply, discuss a government/institutional solution that can mitigate the problem of externality

Consider the case of innovating vaccines without patents (in a perfectly competitive market) (a) Does an externality exist? If so, is it positive/negative (or both) (b) Use Coase’s framework to identify the cause of the externality (c) If an externality exists, determine whether the Coase theorem applies (i.e. is it feasible to assign property rights and solve the problem?) (d) If an externality exists and the Coase theorem does not apply, discuss a government/institutional solution that can mitigate the problem of externality

Economics:

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285859460

Author:BOYES, William

Publisher:BOYES, William

Chapter28: Antitrust And Regulation

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which of the following would be classified as a situation where a third-party benefits from a market transaction by others? a. City buying 10,000 trees for green space renewal projects. b. Increased levels of air pollution in neighborhoods near a football stadium. c. Allowing a mining company to use a natural lake to discharge waste. d. Two firms trading pollution credits to avoid cutting their toxic emissions.
Regarding externalities, the goal of command-and-control policies is to try and prohibit a firm's behavior before it occurs. a) True b) False Note:- Please avoid using ChatGPT and refrain from providing handwritten solutions; otherwise, I will definitely give a downvote. Also, be mindful of plagiarism. Answer completely and accurate answer. Rest assured, you will receive an upvote if the answer is accurate.
Include correctly labeled diagrams, if useful or required, in explaining your answers. A correctly labeled diagram must have all axes and curves clearly labeled and must show directional changes. If the question prompts you to “Calculate,” you must show how you arrived at your final answer. Soybeans are produced and sold in a perfectly competitive market. The fertilizers used in soybean production generate a negative externality by seeping liquid contaminants into local rivers. (e) If this market were a monopoly with identical cost conditions, would the monopoly’s profit-maximizing quantity be greater than, less than, or equal to QC?
This scenario pertains to microeconomics course-externalities focusing on Noise Pollution, which has negative effects on human health. As some scientific studies have shown, community members who are residing around airports have been exposed to frequent noise pollution. As a result, some people's stress levels increased leading to an increased risk of high blood pressure and heart disease. Now, assume that this has had happened in San Diego County, CA. The community members or residents sued SD Airport for producing negative externalities- noise pollution. The final decision or the court verdict was in the favor of the community members. But the judge has failed to come up with an economic model to calculate the total costs of negative externality- noise pollution. To construct the model, the Judge has employed economists to come up with the model to measure the total amount of compensation per household identifying who should get how much, and what factors determine the dollar amount…
Which of the following statements about externalities is correct? a. Education is the standard example used to illustrate a negative externality. b. Externalities caused by the use of the product itself are often a result of competitive pressures to bring the product to market fast. c. Promoting vigorous competition, through the enforcement of the antitrust laws, is the most effective way to reduce externalities. d. All of the above are correct. e. Both a and b are correct. f. Both a and c are correct. g. Both b and c are correct. h. None of the above is correct.
Respond to the question with a concise and accurate answer, along with a clear explanation and step-by-step solution, or risk receiving a downvote. n the table below are the marginal abatement costs of two firms. Note that an entry in the table indicates the cost of reducing emissions by one unit from the previous level. For example, $104 is the additional abatement cost for Firm 1 to reduce its emissions from 3 tons to 2 tons, and $40 is the cost for Firm 2 to reduce its emissions from 7 tons to 6 tons. 1.In an unregulated environment each firm produces 10 tons of emissions (20 tons total). Using the table above, what emissions levels (i.e., emissions standards) would you assign if you wanted to limit aggregate emissions to 7 tons in a cost-effective manner? Firm 1’s emissions level ________________ Firm 2’s emissions level ________________ 2.Given the emissions levels from Question 1, calculate the total abatement cost for each firm? Firm 1’s total abatement cost ________________…
Which of the following statements is correct? Select one: a.In models of network goods with positive externalities, no consumption is always an equilibrium. b. The equilibrium in the hotelling model when both firms have the same location is for the firms to set their prices equal to their (constant) marginal cost even if their marginal costs are different. c. If all firms start wiht the same techonology, under both minor and drastic innovations the inovator firm is only one firm producing after the innovation. d. The Schumpeter hypothesis establishes that competitive firms have higher capacity to produce R&D than monopolies.
When applied to a public good, 'non-rival' means that Select one: A. Consumption of the good by one person does not reduce the amount available to others B. The resources used in its production could not have been used to produce other goods C. If the good is provided for one person it must be provided for others D. There is a single monopoly supplier of the good
Sean is a community college student and has been saving his tips from his job waiting tables at a restaurant for months to see Hamilton. He is willing to pay $705 for a ticket. Anca has seen Hamilton five times already, but wants to see it again before heading to Europe for a month. She is willing to pay $1,250 for a ticket. There is one ticket left, and the seller is charging $700. Does Sean or Anca buying the ticket lead to a more economically efficient outcome?
Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradablepermits Suppose a municipality votes to reduce the combined pollution introduced by three local companies. Presently, each firm creates 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. The government can reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units by choosing between the following two methods: Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government imposes pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government issues tradable pollution permits. The costs faced by each firm are different, so it is more difficult for some firms to reduce pollution than others. The following table shows the cost faced by each firm to eliminate each unit of pollution. Assume that the cost of eliminating all 4 units of pollution (that is, reducing pollution to zero) is prohibitively expensive for all three firms. Firm Cost of Eliminating the... First Unit of Pollution Second Unit of Pollution…
Consider a market with two polluting firms with linear marginal abatement cost curves. Firm B has increasing marginal abatement costs that are everywhere half as high as Firm A’s marginal abatement costs. The maximum amount of pollution that can be tolerated is less than the total these two firms would emit if their pollution was unrestricted. Thus some aggregate amount of abatement is necessary. The pollutant in question is uniformly mixing, so it doesn’t matter which firm cuts back how much, only that between them, they cut back by the required total amount. The environmental agency decides to solve the abatement allocation problem by giving out pollution permits in amounts such that each firm would be obliged to cut back their emissions by an equal amount. Would this be “fair”? Would it be “efficient”?
Based on the best available econometric estimates, the market elasticity of demand for your firm’s product is −2.5. The marginal cost of producing the product is constant at $225, while average total cost at current production levels is $300.Determine your optimal per unit price if:Instructions: Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places.a. you are a monopolist. $ b. you compete against one other firm in a Cournot oligopoly. $ c. you compete against 19 other firms in a Cournot oligopoly. $ Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.