Consider the following list: 2. 3. 5n 7. 1. If the above list was sorted using Selection sort, which two elements would be swapped first? 2. If the below list was sorted using Merge sort algorithm, show the content of ist step-by-step. 3. If the above list was sorted using Quick sort algorithm, show the content of list after the first function call index = partition(list, 0, 7)is executed, and give the values of index and pivot as the middle value.

Consider the following list: 2. 3. 5n 7. 1. If the above list was sorted using Selection sort, which two elements would be swapped first? 2. If the below list was sorted using Merge sort algorithm, show the content of ist step-by-step. 3. If the above list was sorted using Quick sort algorithm, show the content of list after the first function call index = partition(list, 0, 7)is executed, and give the values of index and pivot as the middle value.

C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program Design

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337102087

Author:D. S. Malik

Publisher:D. S. Malik

Chapter16: Searching, Sorting And Vector Type

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16SA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

following is the merge function used by MergeSort algorithm. You have the following MergeSort tree that is used to sort the array {19, 4, 13, 9, 2, 7, 11}: The exact number of data comparisons (i.e if (L[i] <= R[j]) ) needed to merge the sorted sublists {4, 9, 13, 19} and {2, 7, 11} are? 5 6 7 8
Select true or false for the statements below. Explain your answers if you like to receive partial credit 10) Which of the following is true about the linked list functions where the linked list onlycontains a head pointer?a. If the linked list is ordered, you can use binary search and improve theperformance to O(log n)b. The worst case performance of the delete function is in the same Big-Ocategory as the worst case performance of the delete function with anunordered arrayc. If the node you are deleting is at the end of the list, the performance is O(1)
That's enough for you! def first_preceded_by_smaller(items, k=1): Find and return the 0irst element of the given list of items that is preceded by at least k smaller elements in the list. These required k smaller elements can be positioned anywhere before the current element, not necessarily consecutively immediately before that element. If no element satisfying this requirement exists in the list, this function should return None. Since the only operation performed for the individual items is their order comparison, and especially no arithmetic occurs at any point during execution, this function should work for lists of any types of elements, as long as those elements are pairwise comparable with each other. items k Expected result [4, 4, 5, 6] 2 5 [42, 99, 16, 55, 7, 32, 17, 18, 73] 3 18 [42, 99, 16, 55, 7, 32, 17, 18, 73] 8 None ['bob', 'carol', 'tina', 'alex', 'jack', 'emmy', 'tammy', 'sam', 'ted']…
Consider a list of data components L[0:5] = 23, 14, 98, 45, 67, and 53. Let's look for the K = 53 key. Naturally, the search moves down the list, comparing key K with each element until it discovers it as the final element in the list. When looking for the key K = 110, the search moves forward but eventually drops off the list, making it a failed search. Write the algorithmic steps for both sorted and unordered linear searches, along with the times involved.
Consider a list L = {387, 690, 234, 435, 567, 123, 441}. Here, the number ofelements n = 7, the number of digits l = 3 and radix r = 10. This means that radixsort would require 10 bins and would complete the sorting in 3 passes. illustrates the passes of radix sort over the list. It is assumed that each key is thrown into the bin face down. At the end of each pass, when the keys are collected from each bin in order, the list of keys in each bin is turned upside down to be appended to the output list
(a) In what cases should Merge Sort be used? In what cases is it not efficient? Explain.(b) The following is an implementation of merge and mergeSort - Making sure to take note of the added print statement in merge, what would the following call in main print to the screen? int[] a = {4, 3, 2, 1};int[] temp = new int[a.length];mergeSort(a, 0, a.length-1, temp);
Which one of the below uses divide and conquer approach? * a) Insertion sort b) Merge sort c) Shell sort d) Heap sort
Could you help me with this question: Conduct a Merge Sort on the following sequence (show each step): 1,6,3,20,2,10,15,11
Define Merge Sort algorithm. Sort the following array of elements using the Merge Sort algorithm. 13, 9, 15 ,8 , 5, 11
Given an unsorted linked list 8, 78, 26, 12, 45, 39, 67, 51. Sort the linked list using the following sorting algorithm. Write down the coding in c++ and provide the output: 1. Insertion sort 2. Merge sort
By ascending, sort the following data using: -Quick sort -Merge sort Draw its execution schema 14 6 23 18 7 47 2 83 16 38 PLEASE USE HEADER INCLUDE<STDIO.H> AND PAY ATTENTION TO THE QUESTION
Assume that we are utilizing a doubly linked list of unsorted data. What would be the asymptotic running time of the data structure for the following functions? Search() Insert() Delete() Minimum() Maximum() Successor() Predecessor()