Consider the following simplified financial statements for the Wims Corporation(assuming no income taxes)Balance Sheet$10.100 DebtEquityincome StatementSales$25,000Assets$5,800Costs12.9004,300Net income$ 12.100 Total$ 10100Total$ 10100The company has predicted a sales increase of 12 percent It has predicted that everyitem on the balance sheet will increase by 12 percent as well.Create the pro forma statements and reconcile them What is the plug variable here?Multiple Choice$13.010$13.015O s13.021$23.940$13.036

Pro forma Income Statement Sales ($25,000 * 112%) $28,000 Costs ($12,900 * 112%) $14,448 Net…

Consider the following simplified financial statements for the Wims Corporation (assuming no income taxes) Income Statement Balance Sheet $ 10.100 Debt Equity $ 10100 Total The company has predicted a sales increase of 12 percent It has predicted that every Sales $25,000 Assets $5.800 Costs 12.900 4,300 Net income $12100 Total $10100 item on the balance sheet will increase by 12 percent as well Create the pro forma statements and reconcile them. What is the plug variable here?

Consider the following simplified financial statements for the Wims Corporation (assuming no income taxes) Income Statement Balance Sheet $ 10.100 Debt Equity $ 10100 Total The company has predicted a sales increase of 12 percent It has predicted that every Sales $25,000 Assets $5.800 Costs 12.900 4,300 Net income $12100 Total $10100 item on the balance sheet will increase by 12 percent as well Create the pro forma statements and reconcile them. What is the plug variable here?

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter13: Capital Structure Concepts

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Brower Co. is considering the following alternative financing plans: Income tax is estimated at 40% of income. Determine the earnings per share of common stock, assuming that income before bond interest and income tax is 2,000,000.
You are considering two possible companies for investment purposes. The following data is available for each company. Additional Information: Company A: Bad debt estimation percentage using the income statement method is 6%, and the balance sheet method is 10%. The $230,000 in Other Expenses includes all company expenses except Bad Debt Expense. Company B: Bad debt estimation percentage using the income statement method is 6.5%, and the balance sheet method is 8%. The $140,000 in Other Expenses includes all company expenses except Bad Debt Expense. A. Compute the number of days sales in receivables ratio for each company for 2019 and interpret the results (round answers to nearest whole number). B. If Company A changed from the income statement method to the balance sheet method for recognizing bad debt estimation, how would that change net income in 2019? Explain (show calculations). C. If Company B changed from the balance sheet method to the income statement method for recognizing bad debt estimation, how would that change net income in 2019? Explain (show calculations). D. What benefits do each company gain by changing their method of bad debt estimation? E. Which company would you invest in and why? Provide supporting details.
Payne Products had $1.6 million in sales revenues in the most recent year and expects sales growth to be 25% this year. Payne would like to determine the effect of various current assets policies on its financial performance. Payne has $1 million of fixed assets and intends to keep its debt ratio at its historical level of 60%. Payne’s debt interest rate is currently 8%. You are to evaluate three different current asset policies: (1) a restricted policy in which current assets are 45% of projected sales, (2) a moderate policy with 50% of sales tied up in current assets, and (3) a relaxed policy requiring current assets of 60% of sales. Earnings before interest and taxes are expected to be 12% of sales. Payne’s tax rate is 40%. What is the expected return on equity under each current asset level? In this problem, we have assumed that the level of expected sales is independent of current asset policy. Is this a valid assumption? Why or why not? How would the overall risk of the firm vary under each policy?
Macon Mills is a division of Bolin Products. Inc. During the most recent year, Macon had a net income of $40 million. Included in the income was interest expense of $2,800,000. The companys tax rate was 40%. Total assets were $470 million, current liabilities were $104,000,000, and $72,000,000 of the current liabilities are noninterest bearing. What are the invested capital and ROI for Macon?
The income statement, statement of retained earnings, and balance sheet for Somerville Company are as follows: Includes both state and federal taxes. Refer to the information for Somerville Company on the previous pages. Also, assume that the price per common share for Somerville is 8.10. Required: Compute the price-earnings ratio. (Note: Round the answer to two decimal places.)
The Berndt Corporation expects to have sales of 12 million. Costs other than depreciation are expected to be 75% of sales, and depreciation is expected to be 1.5 million. All sales revenues will be collected in cash, and costs other than depreciation must be paid for during the year. Berndts federal-plus-state tax rate is 40%. Berndt has no debt. a. Set up an income statement. What is Berndts expected net income? Its expected net cash flow? b. Suppose Congress changed the tax laws so that Berndts depreciation expenses doubled. No changes in operations occurred. What would happen to reported profit and to net cash flow? c. Now suppose that Congress changed the tax laws such that, instead of doubling Berndts depreciation, it was reduced by 50%. How would profit and net cash flow be affected? d. If this were your company, would you prefer Congress to cause your depreciation expense to be doubled or halved? Why?