Consider the multilevel feedback queue used by CTSS and Multics. Consider a program that consistently uses 7 time units everytime it is scheduled before it performs an I/O operation and blocks. How many time units are allocated to this program when it is scheduled for execution at different points of time?

Consider the multilevel feedback queue used by CTSS and Multics. Consider a program that consistently uses 7 time units everytime it is scheduled before it performs an I/O operation and blocks. How many time units are allocated to this program when it is scheduled for execution at different points of time?

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter13: Internet And Distributed Application Services

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5VE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose there are four processes (P1 - P4) with respective arrival times of 0, 10, 30, and 40, and burst times of 30, 20, 50, and 20 ms. These processes are scheduled from a ready queue on first come first served. The average waiting time is?
Consider the behavior of two machines in a distributed system. Both have clocks that are supposed to tick 1000 times per millisecond. One of them actually does, but the other ticks only 990 times per millisecond. If UTC updates come in once a minute, what is the maximum clock skew thatwill occur?
In the picture attached, the Say that the system is running 3 jobs, A, B, and C, and that all of them are CPU-intensive (i.e., each one does one infinitely long CPU burst). The system begins with A on the CPU at the beginning its time quantum while B and C are in the Ready Queue, in that order. a) Show the execution pattern (as a string of A’s, B’s, C’, and o’s) assuming that the scheduler time quantum is equal to 4 ms. Show the execution for more than 20ms (but less than 30ms). b) In the long run (i.e, assuming jobs don’t ever terminate), what percentage of the CPU time is wasted doing context-switching/scheduling? The answers I came up with is as follows: a) AAAAoBBBoCCCoAAAoBBBoCCCoAAA, because for the first 4ms, A gets to execute it's full time quantum, however, when context-switching to the next job, the switch is included in the time quantum. b) 2.77% spent context switching, divide the number of o's by the total amount of runtime.
what if I want to solve for Multi-Level Feedback Queue scheduling? whats the math for that?
Write an MPI program segment for all-to-all personalized broadcast on a ring of p processors, eachprocessor Pi, 0 ≤ i ≤ p − 1, holding M(i, 0), M(i, 1), ·M(i,(p − 1)). Message M(i, j), an integer, is destinedfrom Pi to Pj . Show only the p − 1 iterative loop. Ensure proper buffer size, MPI message size, howitems are organized and ordered at the destination buffer, etc., through each loop.
CODE IN JAVA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Provide a full code of: CPU multilevel feedback queue scheduler: for this system, we have 3 levels of feedback queue scheduling: (1) top priority queue: Round-Robin quantum = 8ms; (2) middle priority queue: Round-Robin quantum = 16ms (3) low priority queue: FCFS Provide examples of the code's output at the bottom.
There are a number of benefits to preemptively assigning processing to an I/O queue and then passing control to the CPU when it's ready. If the I/O is suddenly stopped, who knows what may happen? Will this have an impact on the CPU's burst? How exactly is this the case?
Consider a paging system with the page table stored in memory.a. If a memory reference takes 400 nanoseconds, how long does a paged memoryreference take?b. If we add TLBs, and 95 percent of all page-table references are found in the TLBs,what is the effective memory reference time? (Assume that finding a page-table entry inthe TLBs takes zero time, if the entry is there.)
What is the benefit of having varied time-quantum sizes at various levels of a multilayer queueing system?Why is it vital for the scheduler to differentiate between I/O-bound and CPU-bound programmes?
A process's execution may be preemptively assigned to an I/O queue and then transferred to the CPU when it's ready. There's no telling what may happen if the I/O is suddenly cut off. Is the CPU's burst going to be diminished? How exactly does this hold true?
Consider a system implementing multilevel queue scheduling. What strategy can a computer user employ to maximize the amount of CPU time allocated to the user's process?
Asynchronous renaming in the message passing model. Code is for process P , 1 ≤ i ≤ n.