Consider two countries, the U.S. and Bangladesh, trading two goods, shoes and food. There are two factors of production, labor and capital. Assume that the production of shoes is relatively more capital intensive than the production of food in the U.S. Instead, the production of shoes is relatively more labor intensive in Bangladesh than the production of food. Assume that the U.S. is the capital abundant country and that Bangladesh is labor abundant. Both goods are produced by both countries in equilibrium. Illustrate the initial factor prices and factor intensities in a carefully drawn and labeled diagram with capital on the y-axis and labor on the x-axis, and indicate the cone(s) of diversification. Assume that the world price of shoes declines, but that both countries' continue to produce both goods. Illustrate the effect of this change in either the same or a new diagram. How do the real returns to both factors change in the two countries? Explain whether your findings are consistent with the Stolper- Samuelson Theorem.

Consider two countries, the U.S. and Bangladesh, trading two goods, shoes and food. There are two factors of production, labor and capital. Assume that the production of shoes is relatively more capital intensive than the production of food in the U.S. Instead, the production of shoes is relatively more labor intensive in Bangladesh than the production of food. Assume that the U.S. is the capital abundant country and that Bangladesh is labor abundant. Both goods are produced by both countries in equilibrium. Illustrate the initial factor prices and factor intensities in a carefully drawn and labeled diagram with capital on the y-axis and labor on the x-axis, and indicate the cone(s) of diversification. Assume that the world price of shoes declines, but that both countries' continue to produce both goods. Illustrate the effect of this change in either the same or a new diagram. How do the real returns to both factors change in the two countries? Explain whether your findings are consistent with the Stolper- Samuelson Theorem.

MACROECONOMICS

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337794985

Author:Baumol

Publisher:Baumol

Chapter18: International Trade And Comparative Advantage

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2TY

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Brazil can produce 100 pounds of beef or 10 autos. In contrast the United States can produce 40 pounds of beef or 30 autos. Which country has the absolute advantage in beef? Which country has the absolute advantage in producing autos? What is the opportunity cost of producing one pound of beef In Brazil? What is the opportunity cost of producing one pound of beef in the United States?
In Germany it takes three workers to make one television and four workers to make one video camera. In Poland It takes six workers to make one television and 12 workers to make one video camera. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of televisions? Who has the absolute advantage in the production of video cameras? How can you tell? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing one additional television set in Germany and In Poland. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which Is tine.) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of televisions? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing one video camera in Germany and in Poland. Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of video cameras? In this example, is absolute advantage the same as comparative advantage, or not? In what product should Germany specialize? In what product should Poland specialize?
True or False: The source of comparative advantage must be natural elements like climate and mineral deposits. Explain.
Does intra-industry trade contradict the theory of comparative advantage?
Table 33.15 shows how the average costs of production for semiconductors (the chips In computer memories) change as the quantity of semiconductors built at that factory increases. Based on these data, sketch a curve with quantity produced on the horizontal axis and average cost of production on the vertical axis. How does the curve illustrate economies of scale? If the equilibrium quantity of semiconductors demanded is 90,000, can this economy take full advantage of economies of scale? What about if quantity demanded is 70,000 semiconductors? 50,000 semiconductors? 30,000 semiconductors? Explain how international trade could make it possible for even a small economy to take full advantage of economies of scale, while also benefiting from competition and the variety offered by several producers.