△ABC△ABC was transformed using two rigid transformations. a. Compare all of the corresponding parts (angles and sides) of the image and preimage. Describe the results. b. Explain why the results are true. A triangle has six parts (three angles and three sides). Suppose you have two triangles that you want to prove are congruent, but you don't know the rigid transformations that map one triangle to the other. a. How do you think you can prove the two triangles are congruent without using rigid transformations? b. Suppose one of your classmates thinks they can prove the triangles are congruent by proving only two pairs of corresponding parts congruent. How would you respond to this classmate?

△ABC△ABC was transformed using two rigid…

Oh no! Our experts couldn't answer your question.

Don't worry! We won't leave you hanging. Plus, we're giving you back one question for the inconvenience.

Submit your question and receive a step-by-step explanation from our experts in as fast as 30 minutes.

You have no more questions left.

Message from our expert:

Our experts need more information to provide you with a solution. No information about triangle ABC is given Please resubmit your question, making sure it's detailed and complete. We've credited a question to your account.

Your Question:

△ABC△ABC was transformed using two rigid transformations.

a. Compare all of the corresponding parts (angles and sides) of the image and preimage. Describe the results.

b. Explain why the results are true.
A triangle has six parts (three angles and three sides). Suppose you have two triangles that you want to prove are congruent, but you don't know the rigid transformations that map one triangle to the other.

a. How do you think you can prove the two triangles are congruent without using rigid transformations?

b. Suppose one of your classmates thinks they can prove the triangles are congruent by proving only two pairs of corresponding parts congruent. How would you respond to this classmate?