Feedback - Q1Most of you managed this well once you realised that for Henry’s Law, the temperature should be approximated as the boiling temperature of the bulk component. This allowed the pure component vapour pressure of the dilute component to be evaluated.For the comparison with the x-y diagram, the determination of the initial gradient was approximate, but the value you found should certainly have corresponded more closely to the non-ideal Henry’s Law constant. This comment applies both to part (a) and part (b).Answer to Q1: a) (i) 3.48 atm; (ii) 7.21 atm, b) (i) 0.242 atm; (ii) 0.449 atmPART 1a) (ii) PLEASE STEPS ON HOW TO REACH ANSWER Activity coefficients are a function of composition (butonly weak dependence on T and P, which we'll ignore)We use an empirical approach to determine y; usingMargules equation:In y¡ = x² (A¡¡ + 2x; (A¡¡ — AjA₁j and Aji are Margules coefficients for the binarymixture of i and jMargules coefficients can be found in tables in textbooksor can be found by matching VLE calculations toexperimental dataThere are of course many alternatives to Antoine's eqnand Margules equation Data:Antoine coefficients (P in mmHg, Tin K, log to base e):Margules parameters:1. a) Calculate the Henry's Law constant for dilute methanol in water at 1 atmosphere:i) assuming ideal solution behaviour;using the Margules Coefficients provided to account for the non-ideality of the solution.Compare your answers with the value roughly obtained from the gradient in the x-y diagram below.Ym (molefraction of methanol in vapour)Methanol: A = 18.588, B = 3626.6, C = -34.29Water: A = 18.304, B = 3816.4, C = -46.13Ethanol: A = 18.9119, B = 3803.98, C = -41.68b) Now repeat part a) but this time to determine the Henry's Law constant for dilute water inmethanol at p=1 atm. Again, compare your results to the constant roughly obtained from the x-ydiagram.0.80.6Methanol-Water: Awm = 0.6174, Amw = 0.7279Ethanol-Water: Awe = 0.7917, Aew = 1.63660.40.2x-y diagram for methanol/water at 1 atm0.20.60.4Xm (molefraction of methanol in liquid)0.8

Data: Antoine coefficients (P in mmHg, Tin K, log to base e): Margules parameters: 1. a) Calculate the Henry's Law constant for dilute methanol in water at 1 atmosphere: i) assuming ideal solution behaviour; using the Margules Coefficients provided to account for the non-ideality of the solution. Compare your answers with the value roughly obtained from the gradient in the x-y diagram below. Ym (molefraction of methanol in vapour) Methanol: A = 18.588, B = 3626.6, C = -34.29 Water: A = 18.304, B = 3816.4, C = -46.13 Ethanol: A = 18.9119, B = 3803.98, C = -41.68 b) Now repeat part a) but this time to determine the Henry's Law constant for dilute water in methanol at p=1 atm. Again, compare your results to the constant roughly obtained from the x-y diagram. 0.8 0.6 Methanol-Water: Awm = 0.6174, Amw = 0.7279 Ethanol-Water: Awe = 0.7917, Aew = 1.6366 0.4 0.2 x-y diagram for methanol/water at 1 atm 0.2 0.6 0.4 Xm (molefraction of methanol in liquid) 0.8

Data: Antoine coefficients (P in mmHg, Tin K, log to base e): Margules parameters: 1. a) Calculate the Henry's Law constant for dilute methanol in water at 1 atmosphere: i) assuming ideal solution behaviour; using the Margules Coefficients provided to account for the non-ideality of the solution. Compare your answers with the value roughly obtained from the gradient in the x-y diagram below. Ym (molefraction of methanol in vapour) Methanol: A = 18.588, B = 3626.6, C = -34.29 Water: A = 18.304, B = 3816.4, C = -46.13 Ethanol: A = 18.9119, B = 3803.98, C = -41.68 b) Now repeat part a) but this time to determine the Henry's Law constant for dilute water in methanol at p=1 atm. Again, compare your results to the constant roughly obtained from the x-y diagram. 0.8 0.6 Methanol-Water: Awm = 0.6174, Amw = 0.7279 Ethanol-Water: Awe = 0.7917, Aew = 1.6366 0.4 0.2 x-y diagram for methanol/water at 1 atm 0.2 0.6 0.4 Xm (molefraction of methanol in liquid) 0.8

Principles of Instrumental Analysis

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305577213

Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch

Publisher:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch

ChapterA1: Evaluation Of Analytical Data

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem A1.22QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A reaction mixture (mixture 1) at 298 K has a N2O4(g) partial pressure of 0.1 bar anda NO2(g) partial pressure of 0.05 bar. Calculate the reaction Gibbs energy (∆??) formixture 1 at 298 K. A second reaction mixture (mixture 2) is prepared at 298 K with a N2O4(g) partialpressure of 0.05 bar and a NO2(g) partial pressure of 0.10 bar. (i) Calculate the reaction Gibbs energy (∆??) for mixture 2 at 298 K. (ii) Comment on the spontaneity of the forward reaction for mixture 1 and mixture 2.Support your answer with the values of ∆?? calculated for the two mixtures. please give solution and answer
For titration for determination of Chloride, 0.05 AgNO3 and NaCl with a 5% (w/v) K2CrO4 indicator, what is the % (w/w) Cl- using the atomic weight for Chlorine. Data below: Primary standard weight 0.1173g , 0.1056g , and 0.1049g Vol of titrant delivered 35.47mL , 31.75mL, and 31.04mL Uknown Chloride mass 0.1527g, 0.1442g, and 0.1337g Vol of titrant delivered 40.00mL ,37.68mL ,and 34.96 mL
To determine the fluoride content in an aqueous and chloride-containing preparation of ammonium fluoride, the following analysis was performed. 105.2 mg of the preparation was dissolved in 100.0 mL of water. Then a 300 mL 40 mM lead chloride solution was added, whereby all fluoride ions were precipitated out of the solution in the form of the sparingly soluble salt PbClF (s). The precipitate was separated and washed at 15 degrees with a lead fluoride chloride saturated solution and dried at 130 degrees. The precipitate weighed 651.3 mg. a) Calculate the fluoride content (as % by weight F) in the preparation.b) Determine the purity of the ammonium fluoride preparation
Calculate the gravimetric factor of the following. 2 Fe is sought(Analyte), 1Fe2O3 is weighed (Precipitate)
The following evidence was obtained from an experiment to determine the solubility of calcium chloride at room temperature. A sample of saturated calcium chloride solution was evaporated to dryness, and the mass of solid residue was measured.EvidenceVolume of solution (mL) = 15.0Mass of empty beaker (g) = 90.54Mass of beaker and residue (g) = 101.36The solubility of calcium chloride is g/100 mL
Calculate the gravimetric factor of the following. 2 Fe3O4 is sought(Analyte), 3 Fe2O3 is weighed (Precipitate) 2 Fe is sought(Analyte), 1Fe2O3 is weighed (Precipitate)
Calculate the % relative error in solubility by using concentrations instead of activitiesfor Fe(OH)2 in 0.0500 M KNO3 (give the source for thermodynamic solubility).
A reaction mixture (mixture 1) at 298 K has a N2O4(g) partial pressure of 0.1 bar anda NO2(g) partial pressure of 0.05 bar. Calculate the reaction Gibbs energy (∆??) formixture 1 at 298 K. please give solution and answer
One litre of a saturated aqueous solution of Ag2SO4 (MW = 311.79 g mol- 1) at 25 °C is evaporated to dryness. 4.844 g of Ag2SO4 residue was produced. What is the solubility product (Ksp)?
A reaction mixture (mixture 1) at 298 K has a N2O4(g) partial pressure of 0.1 bar anda NO2(g) partial pressure of 0.05 bar. Calculate the reaction Gibbs energy (∆??) formixture 1 at 298 K. please give answer and solution
KMnO4 and Na2C2O4 solutions were used in the reactions that took place in a back titration to determine the amount of H2O2 in a sample. Calculate the concentration of H2O2 in the sample (w / v) as% by making appropriate assumptions for the volumes and normality of all these solutions.
Soil Fertility Index and Soil Evaluation Factors, Are these equations suitable for alkaline soil? Soil Fertility Index (SFI) = pH + organic matter (%, dry soil basis) + available P (mg kg-1 dry soil) + exch K (cmolckg-1) + exch Ca (cmolckg-1) + exch Mg (cmolckg-1)-exch Al (cmolckg-1) Soil Evaluation Factor (SEF) = [Exch K (cmolckg-1) + Exch Ca (cmolckg-1) + Exch Mg (cmolckg-1)-log(1 + exch Al (cmolckg-1)] × organic matter (%, dry soil) + 5