●Describe the historical context surrounding documents 1 and 2Analyze Document 2 and explain how audience, or purpose, or bias, or point of view affectsthis document's use as a reliable source of evidenceDocument 1:...I cannot tell you tonight as your President-with certainty-that a Communist conquest of South Vietnamwould be followed by a Communist conquest of Southeast Asia. But I do know there are North Vietnamesetroops in Laos. I do know that there are North Vietnamese trained guerrillas tonight in northeast Thailand. I doknow that there are Communist-supported guerrilla forces operating in Burma. And a Communist coup wasbarely averted in Indonesia, the fifth largest nation in the world.So your American President cannot tell you-with certainty-that a Southeast Asia dominated by Communistpower would bring a third world war much closer to terrible reality. One could hope that this would not be so.But all that we have learned in this tragic century strongly suggests to me that it would be so. As President ofthe United States, I am not prepared to gamble on the chance that it is not so.I am not prepared to risk the security-indeed, the survival of this American Nation on mere hope and wishfulthinking. I am convinced that by seeing this struggle through now, we are greatly reducing the chances of amuch larger war-perhaps a nuclear war. I would rather stand in Vietnam, in our time, and by meeting thisdanger now, and facing up to it, thereby reduce the danger for our children and for our grandchildren....Source: President Lyndon B. Johnson speech in Congress on Vietnam September 29, 1967Document 2:As a veteran and one who feels this anger, I would like to talk about it. We are angry because we feel we havebeen used in the worst fashion by the administration of this country....we cannot consider ourselves America's best men when we are ashamed of and hated what we were calledon to do in Southeast Asia. In our opinion, and from our experience, there is nothing in South Vietnam, nothingwhich could happen that realistically threatens the United States of America. And to attempt to justify the lossof one American life in Vietnam...by linking such loss to the preservation of freedom is to us the height ofcriminal hypocrisy, and it is that kind of hypocrisy which we feel has torn this country apart.... I want to relate to you the feeling that many of the men who have returned to this country express becausewe are probably angriest about all that we were told about Vietnam and about the mystical war againstcommunism. We found that not only was it a civil war, an effort by a people who had for years been seekingtheir liberation from any colonial influence whatsoever.......We found most people didn't even know the difference between communism and democracy. They onlywanted to work in rice paddies without helicopters strafing them and bombs with napalm burning their villagesand tearing their country apart. They wanted everything to do with the war, particularly with this foreignpresence of the United States of America, to leave them alone in peace, and they practiced the art of survival bysiding with whichever military force was present at a particular time, be it Vietcong, North Vietnamese, orAmerican."Source: Excerpt from testimony provided by Lt. John Kerry on behalf of Vietnam Veterans ofAmerica to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22, 1971. Kerry later became aU.S. Senator himself, representing Massachusetts and was appointed Secretary of State in 2013Describe the historical context surrounding these documentsIdentify and explain the relationship between the events and/or ideas found in thesedocuments (Cause and Effect, or Similarity/Difference, or Turning Point)MARCHOBSOR ALLow!MARCJOES VOTINGRIGHTSNOWENDSEGREGATEDPUBLIJOSSPerfeEQUAL

Question

●Describe the historical context surrounding documents 1 and 2Analyze Document 2 and explain how audience, or purpose, or bias, or point of view affectsthis document's use as a reliable source of evidenceDocument 1:...I cannot tell you tonight as your President-with certainty-that a Communist conquest of South Vietnamwould be followed by a Communist conquest of Southeast Asia. But I do know there are North Vietnamesetroops in Laos. I do know that there are North Vietnamese trained guerrillas tonight in northeast Thailand. I doknow that there are Communist-supported guerrilla forces operating in Burma. And a Communist coup wasbarely averted in Indonesia, the fifth largest nation in the world.So your American President cannot tell you-with certainty-that a Southeast Asia dominated by Communistpower would bring a third world war much closer to terrible reality. One could hope that this would not be so.But all that we have learned in this tragic century strongly suggests to me that it would be so. As President ofthe United States, I am not prepared to gamble on the chance that it is not so.I am not prepared to risk the security-indeed, the survival of this American Nation on mere hope and wishfulthinking. I am convinced that by seeing this struggle through now, we are greatly reducing the chances of amuch larger war-perhaps a nuclear war. I would rather stand in Vietnam, in our time, and by meeting thisdanger now, and facing up to it, thereby reduce the danger for our children and for our grandchildren....Source: President Lyndon B. Johnson speech in Congress on Vietnam September 29, 1967Document 2:As a veteran and one who feels this anger, I would like to talk about it. We are angry because we feel we havebeen used in the worst fashion by the administration of this country....we cannot consider ourselves America's best men when we are ashamed of and hated what we were calledon to do in Southeast Asia. In our opinion, and from our experience, there is nothing in South Vietnam, nothingwhich could happen that realistically threatens the United States of America. And to attempt to justify the lossof one American life in Vietnam...by linking such loss to the preservation of freedom is to us the height ofcriminal hypocrisy, and it is that kind of hypocrisy which we feel has torn this country apart.... I want to relate to you the feeling that many of the men who have returned to this country express becausewe are probably angriest about all that we were told about Vietnam and about the mystical war againstcommunism. We found that not only was it a civil war, an effort by a people who had for years been seekingtheir liberation from any colonial influence whatsoever.......We found most people didn't even know the difference between communism and democracy. They onlywanted to work in rice paddies without helicopters strafing them and bombs with napalm burning their villagesand tearing their country apart. They wanted everything to do with the war, particularly with this foreignpresence of the United States of America, to leave them alone in peace, and they practiced the art of survival bysiding with whichever military force was present at a particular time, be it Vietcong, North Vietnamese, orAmerican.&#34;Source: Excerpt from testimony provided by Lt. John Kerry on behalf of Vietnam Veterans ofAmerica to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22, 1971. Kerry later became aU.S. Senator himself, representing Massachusetts and was appointed Secretary of State in 2013Describe the historical context surrounding these documentsIdentify and explain the relationship between the events and/or ideas found in thesedocuments (Cause and Effect, or Similarity/Difference, or Turning Point)MARCHOBSOR ALLow!MARCJOES VOTINGRIGHTSNOWENDSEGREGATEDPUBLIJOSSPerfeEQUAL

Accepted Answer

Since you have assigned multiple queries, I will deliver the answer only to the first question as…

Describe the historical context surrounding documents 1 and 2 Analyze Document 2 and explain how audience, or purpose, or bias, or point of view affects this document's use as a reliable source of evidence Document 1: