DISCUS SION QUESTIONS According to Kant's categorical imperative. is your action not to present Leslie's alternative ethical? According to utilitarianism, is your action not to present Leslie's alternative ethical? Assume: a. You were right. Had the company embarked on Leslie's a. According to Kar sion not to postpc b. According to util pone ethical? 6. Suppose Leslie learn tive, and you two be ny's disadvantage., th

Database System Concepts
7th Edition
ISBN:9780078022159
Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Chapter1: Introduction
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PE
icon
Related questions
Question
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
a. According to Kant's categorical imperative, is a deci-
sion not to postpone ethical?
b. According to utilitarianism, is a decision not to post-
pone ethical?
6. Suppose Leslie learns you presented only your alterna-
tive, and you two become archenemies. To the compa-
ny's disadvantage, the two of you are never able to work
together again. According to utilitarianism, does this
outcome change the ethics of your behavior?
7. Suppose that instead of not presenting Leslie's alternative
at all. you present it, but in a very negative light. You are
honest when you focus the bulk of your description of it
on disadvantages because that's what you believe. How-
ever, you also know that Leslie does not agree with the
way you see the situation. Given your biased presenta-
tion, the committee selects your alternative.
a. According to Kant's categorical imperative, is your
1. According to Kant's categorical imperative, is your
action not to present Leslie's alternative ethical?
2. According to utilitarianism, is your action not to present
Leslie's alternative ethical?
3. Assume:
a. You were right. Had the company embarked on Leslie's
alternative, it would have driven the company into
bankruptcy. Does this fact make your actions more
ethical? Explain your answer.
b. You were wrong. Leslie's alternative would have been
far superior to yours for the company's future. Does
this fact make your actions less ethical? Explain your
answer.
4. In your opinion, do the intended consequences or the
actual consequences have more bearing when assessing
ethics from a utilitarian perspective?
5. You could postpone the meeting until Leslie is able to
attend and thus allow Leslie to present the alternative to
yours. Doing so, however, increases the likelihood that
the committee selects Leslie's alternative, and you firmly
believe that decision will be fatal to the company.
behavior ethical?
b. According to utilitarianism, is your behavior ethical?
8. What would you do in this circumstance? Justify the
ethics of your decision.
Transcribed Image Text:DISCUSSION QUESTIONS a. According to Kant's categorical imperative, is a deci- sion not to postpone ethical? b. According to utilitarianism, is a decision not to post- pone ethical? 6. Suppose Leslie learns you presented only your alterna- tive, and you two become archenemies. To the compa- ny's disadvantage, the two of you are never able to work together again. According to utilitarianism, does this outcome change the ethics of your behavior? 7. Suppose that instead of not presenting Leslie's alternative at all. you present it, but in a very negative light. You are honest when you focus the bulk of your description of it on disadvantages because that's what you believe. How- ever, you also know that Leslie does not agree with the way you see the situation. Given your biased presenta- tion, the committee selects your alternative. a. According to Kant's categorical imperative, is your 1. According to Kant's categorical imperative, is your action not to present Leslie's alternative ethical? 2. According to utilitarianism, is your action not to present Leslie's alternative ethical? 3. Assume: a. You were right. Had the company embarked on Leslie's alternative, it would have driven the company into bankruptcy. Does this fact make your actions more ethical? Explain your answer. b. You were wrong. Leslie's alternative would have been far superior to yours for the company's future. Does this fact make your actions less ethical? Explain your answer. 4. In your opinion, do the intended consequences or the actual consequences have more bearing when assessing ethics from a utilitarian perspective? 5. You could postpone the meeting until Leslie is able to attend and thus allow Leslie to present the alternative to yours. Doing so, however, increases the likelihood that the committee selects Leslie's alternative, and you firmly believe that decision will be fatal to the company. behavior ethical? b. According to utilitarianism, is your behavior ethical? 8. What would you do in this circumstance? Justify the ethics of your decision.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Intelligent Machines
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Database System Concepts
Database System Concepts
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780078022159
Author:
Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780134444321
Author:
Tony Gaddis
Publisher:
PEARSON
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780132737968
Author:
Thomas L. Floyd
Publisher:
PEARSON
C How to Program (8th Edition)
C How to Program (8th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780133976892
Author:
Paul J. Deitel, Harvey Deitel
Publisher:
PEARSON
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag…
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag…
Computer Science
ISBN:
9781337627900
Author:
Carlos Coronel, Steven Morris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Programmable Logic Controllers
Programmable Logic Controllers
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780073373843
Author:
Frank D. Petruzella
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education