Do bonds reduce the overall risk of an investment portfolio? Let x be a random variable representing annual percent return for Vanguard Total Stock Index (all stocks). Let y be a random variable representing annual return for Vanguard Balanced Index (60% stock and 40% bond). For the past several years, we have the following data. LUSE SALT (a) Compute Σx, Σχ2, ΣΥ, ΣΥ?. Ex xx² x: 15 0 24 28 15 17 36 -9 -16 -16 y: 21 -8 27 10 10 27 22 -2 -3 -1 Ey 103 X s² (b) Use the results of part (a) to compute the sample mean, variance, and standard deviation for x and for y. (Round your answers to four decimal places.) y S X Lower Limit Upper Limit CV x X x (c) Compute a 75% Chebyshev interval around the mean for x values and also for y values. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) X X x x y Use the intervals to compare the two funds. O 75% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund. O 75% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a narrower range than those of the balanced fund. O 25% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund. O 25% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a wider range than those of the balanced fund. X X (d) Compute the coefficient of variation for each fund. (Round your answers to the nearest whole number.) y % % Use the coefficients of variation to compare the two funds. O For each unit of return, the stock fund has lower risk. O For each unit of return, the balanced fund has lower risk. O For each unit of return, the funds have equal risk. If s represents risks and x represents expected return, then s/x can be thought of as a measure of risk per unit of expected return. In this case, why is a smaller CV better? Explain. A smaller CV is better because it indicates a higher risk per unit of expected return. A smaller CV is better because it indicates a lower risk per unit of expected return.
Do bonds reduce the overall risk of an investment portfolio? Let x be a random variable representing annual percent return for Vanguard Total Stock Index (all stocks). Let y be a random variable representing annual return for Vanguard Balanced Index (60% stock and 40% bond). For the past several years, we have the following data. LUSE SALT (a) Compute Σx, Σχ2, ΣΥ, ΣΥ?. Ex xx² x: 15 0 24 28 15 17 36 -9 -16 -16 y: 21 -8 27 10 10 27 22 -2 -3 -1 Ey 103 X s² (b) Use the results of part (a) to compute the sample mean, variance, and standard deviation for x and for y. (Round your answers to four decimal places.) y S X Lower Limit Upper Limit CV x X x (c) Compute a 75% Chebyshev interval around the mean for x values and also for y values. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) X X x x y Use the intervals to compare the two funds. O 75% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund. O 75% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a narrower range than those of the balanced fund. O 25% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund. O 25% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a wider range than those of the balanced fund. X X (d) Compute the coefficient of variation for each fund. (Round your answers to the nearest whole number.) y % % Use the coefficients of variation to compare the two funds. O For each unit of return, the stock fund has lower risk. O For each unit of return, the balanced fund has lower risk. O For each unit of return, the funds have equal risk. If s represents risks and x represents expected return, then s/x can be thought of as a measure of risk per unit of expected return. In this case, why is a smaller CV better? Explain. A smaller CV is better because it indicates a higher risk per unit of expected return. A smaller CV is better because it indicates a lower risk per unit of expected return.
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
1st Edition
ISBN:9780547587776
Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Chapter11: Data Analysis And Probability
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8CR
Related questions
Question
Do bonds reduce the overall risk of an investment portfolio? Let x be a random variable representing annual percent return for Vanguard Total Stock Index (all stocks). Let y be a random variable representing annual return for Vanguard Balanced Index (60% stock and 40% bond). For the past several years, we have the following data.
x: |
15
|
0
|
24
|
28
|
15
|
17
|
36
|
−9
|
−16
|
−16
|
y: |
21
|
−8
|
27
|
10
|
10
|
27
|
22
|
−2
|
−3
|
−1
|
![Do bonds reduce the overall risk of an investment portfolio? Let x be a random variable representing annual percent return for
Vanguard Total Stock Index (all stocks). Let y be a random variable representing annual return for Vanguard Balanced Index (60%
stock and 40% bond). For the past several years, we have the following data.
(a) Compute Σx, Σχ2, Σy, Σyλ.
186 Σχιζ
Ex
ΣΥ 103
x
S²
x: 15 0 24 28 15 17 36 -9 -16 -16
y: 21 -8 27 10 10 27 22 -2 -3 -1
USE SALT
(b) Use the results of part (a) to compute the sample mean, variance, and standard deviation for x and for y. (Round your
answers to four decimal places.)
X
y
S
Lower Limit
Upper Limit
X
X
X
CV
(c) Compute a 75% Chebyshev interval around the mean for x values and also for y values. (Round your answers to two
decimal places.)
X
X
X
X
x
x
Use the intervals to compare the two funds.
O 75% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund..
O 75% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a narrower range than those of the balanced fund.
O 25% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund.
O 25% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a wider range than those of the balanced fund.
(d) Compute the coefficient of variation for each fund. (Round your answers to the nearest whole number.).
Y
%
%
Use the coefficients of variation to compare the two funds.
O For each unit of return, the stock fund has lower risk.
O For each unit of return, the balanced fund has lower risk.
For each unit of return, the funds have equal risk.
If s represents risks and x represents expected return, then s/x can be thought of as a measure of risk per unit of
expected return. In this case, why is a smaller CV better? Explain.
A smaller CV is better because it indicates a higher risk per unit of expected return..
O A smaller CV is better because it indicates a lower risk per unit of expected return.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fcc956641-00e2-42af-a967-6b0ff5206b81%2Fef3aa219-9ad1-4045-acf3-0b9af28dc5cf%2Fyt02j21_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Do bonds reduce the overall risk of an investment portfolio? Let x be a random variable representing annual percent return for
Vanguard Total Stock Index (all stocks). Let y be a random variable representing annual return for Vanguard Balanced Index (60%
stock and 40% bond). For the past several years, we have the following data.
(a) Compute Σx, Σχ2, Σy, Σyλ.
186 Σχιζ
Ex
ΣΥ 103
x
S²
x: 15 0 24 28 15 17 36 -9 -16 -16
y: 21 -8 27 10 10 27 22 -2 -3 -1
USE SALT
(b) Use the results of part (a) to compute the sample mean, variance, and standard deviation for x and for y. (Round your
answers to four decimal places.)
X
y
S
Lower Limit
Upper Limit
X
X
X
CV
(c) Compute a 75% Chebyshev interval around the mean for x values and also for y values. (Round your answers to two
decimal places.)
X
X
X
X
x
x
Use the intervals to compare the two funds.
O 75% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund..
O 75% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a narrower range than those of the balanced fund.
O 25% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund.
O 25% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a wider range than those of the balanced fund.
(d) Compute the coefficient of variation for each fund. (Round your answers to the nearest whole number.).
Y
%
%
Use the coefficients of variation to compare the two funds.
O For each unit of return, the stock fund has lower risk.
O For each unit of return, the balanced fund has lower risk.
For each unit of return, the funds have equal risk.
If s represents risks and x represents expected return, then s/x can be thought of as a measure of risk per unit of
expected return. In this case, why is a smaller CV better? Explain.
A smaller CV is better because it indicates a higher risk per unit of expected return..
O A smaller CV is better because it indicates a lower risk per unit of expected return.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 5 steps with 5 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780547587776/9780547587776_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
![Calculus For The Life Sciences](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780321964038/9780321964038_smallCoverImage.gif)
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
![Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
![Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780547587776/9780547587776_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
![Calculus For The Life Sciences](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780321964038/9780321964038_smallCoverImage.gif)
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
![Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage