e) the set of nonnegative rational numbers My solution to le)....(Check whether I'm correct)

Elements Of Modern Algebra
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285463230
Author:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Chapter2: The Integers
Section2.6: Congruence Classes
Problem 25E
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
See the images. I wasn’t able to copy and paste my previous question? The question was rejected.
3:48
←
Is my proof in chapter 1.1 #le of "Elementary
Number Theory & It's Application" correct?
Question 1: Determine whether each of the
following sets is well-ordered. Either give a
proof using the well-ordering property of the
set of positive integers, or give an example of
the subset of the set that has no smallest
element.
a) the set of integers greater than 3
b) the set of even positive integers
c) the set of positive rational numbers
d) the set of positive rational numbers that can
be written in the form a/2, where a is a positive
integer.
e) the set of nonnegative rational numbers
My solution to 1e)....(Check whether I'm
correct)
If the set of non-negative real numbers can be
written as p/q, where p and q are integers, from
the def. of le, we get
p/q>=0. Therefore, multiplying both sides of p/
q>=0, gives p>=0. Therefore, since p can equal
zero, p/q can equal zero. Hence zero is the
smallest element of p/q. Because, there is
√x
8
Transcribed Image Text:3:48 ← Is my proof in chapter 1.1 #le of "Elementary Number Theory & It's Application" correct? Question 1: Determine whether each of the following sets is well-ordered. Either give a proof using the well-ordering property of the set of positive integers, or give an example of the subset of the set that has no smallest element. a) the set of integers greater than 3 b) the set of even positive integers c) the set of positive rational numbers d) the set of positive rational numbers that can be written in the form a/2, where a is a positive integer. e) the set of nonnegative rational numbers My solution to 1e)....(Check whether I'm correct) If the set of non-negative real numbers can be written as p/q, where p and q are integers, from the def. of le, we get p/q>=0. Therefore, multiplying both sides of p/ q>=0, gives p>=0. Therefore, since p can equal zero, p/q can equal zero. Hence zero is the smallest element of p/q. Because, there is √x 8
smallest element in the set, using the well-
ordering property-where every non-empty set
of positive integers has a least smallest element
-we can say the set in le) is well-ordered?
Question Regarding Solution:
If my proof is flawed, how do we improve the
solution?
Transcribed Image Text:smallest element in the set, using the well- ordering property-where every non-empty set of positive integers has a least smallest element -we can say the set in le) is well-ordered? Question Regarding Solution: If my proof is flawed, how do we improve the solution?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer