Entrepreneurs shift capital and labor across industries in pursuit of profit. Let’s look at this a little more closely. Suppose there are two industries: a high‑profit industry, Industry H, and a low‑profit industry, Industry L. Answer the following questions about these two industries. a. If the two industries have similar costs, then what must be true about prices in the two industries? Prices in Industry H and Industry L must be equal. must be lower in Industry H than in Industry L. must be higher in Industry H than in Industry L. in Industry H and Industry L cannot be compared.

Entrepreneurs shift capital and labor across industries in pursuit of profit. Let’s look at this a little more closely. Suppose there are two industries: a high‑profit industry, Industry H, and a low‑profit industry, Industry L. Answer the following questions about these two industries. a. If the two industries have similar costs, then what must be true about prices in the two industries? Prices in Industry H and Industry L must be equal. must be lower in Industry H than in Industry L. must be higher in Industry H than in Industry L. in Industry H and Industry L cannot be compared.

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter22: Perfect Competition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The market structure of perfect competition has a lot of ideal qualities–hence the name perfect. For example, perfectly competitive firms are productively efficient, and perfectly competitive markets are allocatively efficient. It is, however, difficult to find many examples of perfectly competition in the real world. Perfect competition is really a benchmark against which we compare other market structures in the real world. How much actual competition occurs in perfectly competitive markets? Some make the claim that there is actually no competition between firms in a perfectly competitive market. Do you agree or disagree with this claim? What is your reasoning?
Explain reasons for why some people believe having just a few firms in an industry is desirable?
Consider two companies (A and B) which produce good A and good B respectively. To produce A, one needs capital and labor. To produce B, one also needs capital and labor; however, the supply elasticity of capital is lower for good B than it is for good A. In other words, as interest rates change, people are less likely to invest in good B than in good A. Holding all else constant, which good will have a higher elasticity of labor demand (in absolute value) and why?
Do firms really calculate marginal cost and marginal revenue to find the profit-maximizing output? If you examine the accounting records of most small businesses, you will be hard pressed to find explicit calculations of marginal cost and marginal revenue. So, why do economists develop rather elaborate, formal models of profit maximization when no one seems to do what we say they do?
Why do economists believe that economic profit is the more accurate measure of a business success? Why is economic profit the superior method of determining a business success?
(This is a single question with five parts to the answer. I would appreciate help with all five parts if possible. Image screenshot of the original question with the formulas more easily readable than can be identified here is attached) Tech firms produce goods and services from labor and energy. The total cost in dollars to produce y amount of goods and services for each firm j is cj(yj) = yi2. There are 100 identical tech firms which all behave competitively. What is the individual supply of technological goods and services? What is the market supply of technological goods and services? Suppose the demand curve for these goods is D(p)=200-50p. What is the equilibrium price and quantity sold? How much is the total surplus of this economy? Now suppose that the industry makes a one-time investment for $K amount of dollars to innovate in a new technology of production that allows every firm to reduce its cost of production to a 1/4 fraction of the previous cost. What is the new total…
According to Coase's theory of the firm, why do firms exist? How do firms contribute to the efficiency of the market economy in ways that networks of independent contractors do not? How are the boundaries of the firm best established?
Critically evaluate the following statement: “if factories must pay a fixed cost to open, then a short run government subsidy to factories will lead to a long run increase in industrialization.”
Suppose all firms in a perfectly competitive market structure are in long-runequilibrium. Then demand for the firms’ product increases. Initially, price andeconomic profits rise. Soon afterward, the government decides to tax most (but not all) of the economic profits, arguing that the firms in the industry did not earn the profits. Rather, the profits were simply the result of an increase in demand. What effect, if any, will the tax have on market adjustment?
Why is the perfect competition often used as a benchmark? Question 3 options: The perfect competition model is more frequently observed in the real world compared to other market models It provides a useful comparison to markets that operate in more complex, real-world conditions. It accounts for a variety of issues like pollution, inventions of new technology, poverty, and government programs that other models do not account for. In the real world, all markets are perfectly competitive, so this model allows us to compare them to one another.
If all assumptions of perfect competition hold, why would firms in such an industry have little incentive to carry out technological change or much research and development?
Using the tools of economic analysis that you learned, analyze the behavior of the enterprise operating in the perfectly competitive market, in both the short and long term, if it achieves an economic loss in the short term.