Subject; ste Fifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and then their weights andchest sizes were measured and listed in a data set. Results areshown in the accompanying display. Is there sufficient evidence tosupport the claim that there is a linear correlation between theweights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring ananesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight?If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used topredict the weight? Use a significance level of a = 0.05.Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.Ho: PH₁: P(Type integers or decimals. Do not round.)Identify the correlation coefficient, r.r=(Round to three decimal places as needed.)Identify the critical value(s).(Round to three decimal places as needed.)OA. There is one critical value at r=B. There are two critical values at r= tCorrelation ResultsCorrelation coeff, r: 0.959176Critical r:P-value (two tailed): 0.000+0.2680855. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bearsand their chest sizes? Choose the correct answer below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box within yourchoice.(Round to three decimal places as needed.)OA. Yes, because the absolute value of the test statisticB. No, because the absolute value of the test statisticOC. Yes, because the test statisticfalls between the critical values.D. No, because the test statisticfalls between the critical values.O E. The answer cannot be determined from the given information.exceeds the critical value.exceeds the critical value.When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appearthat a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight?OA. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would requirelifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could be used to predict weight because there is alinear correlation between the two.OB. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would requirelifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could not be used to predict weight because there isnot a linear correlation between the two.OC. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would requirelifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could not be used to predict weight because there istoo much variance in the weight of the bears.OD. No, it is easier to measure weight than chest size because the chest is not a flat surface.

Question

Accepted Answer

The corr. result is as follows:

Corr. coeff., r
0.959176

Critical value of r
±0.2680855…