Grapes and bananas are perfect complements for Jane and Betty. Jane eats one grape per three bananas.; Betty eats three grapes per one banana. Once they go to sports for hours, Jane had 20 grapes and 10 bananas and Betty had 10 grapes and 20 bananas. (assume that grapes and bananas can be divided into half) 1.Show all Pareto optimal allocations of grapes and bananas between Jane and Betty in the Edgeworth Box. Draw a bunch of indifference curves and look for tangencies.

Grapes and bananas are perfect complements for Jane and Betty. Jane eats one grape per three bananas.; Betty eats three grapes per one banana. Once they go to sports for hours, Jane had 20 grapes and 10 bananas and Betty had 10 grapes and 20 bananas. (assume that grapes and bananas can be divided into half) 1.Show all Pareto optimal allocations of grapes and bananas between Jane and Betty in the Edgeworth Box. Draw a bunch of indifference curves and look for tangencies.

Micro Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613064

Author:Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.

Chapter6: Consumer Choice Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 24SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Grapes and bananas are complements for Jane and Betty. They always eat bananas and grapes in exact proportions. Jane eats one grape per three bananas.; Betty eats three grapes per one banana. Once they go to sports for hours, Jane had 30 grapes and 3 bananas and Betty had 3 grapes and 30 bananas. (assume that grapes and bananas can be divided into half) 1.Show all Pareto optimal allocations of grapes and bananas between Jane and Betty in the Edgeworth Box. Draw a bunch of indifference curves and look for tangencies.
Grapes and bananas are perfect complements for Jane and Betty. They always eat bananas and grapes in exact proportions. Jane eats one grape per three bananas.; Betty eats three grapes per one banana. Once they go to sports for hours, Jane had 30 grapes and 3 bananas and Betty had 3 grapes and 30 bananas. (assume that grapes and bananas can be divided into half) 1.Show all Pareto optimal allocations of grapes and bananas between Jane and Betty in the Edgeworth Box. Draw a bunch of indifference curves and look for tangencies.
Grapes and bananas are perfect complements for Jane and Betty. Jane eats one grape per three bananas.; Betty eats three grapes per one banana. Once they go to sports for hours, Jane had 20 grapes and 10 bananas and Betty had 10 grapes and 20 bananas. (assume that grapes and bananas can be divided into half) 1. Dar the Edgeworth box and show all Pareto optimal allocations of grapes and bananas between Jane and Betty.
Which is the correct answer ? Suppose there are 10 apples and 10 oranges in the economy. Joe is currently consuming 4 apples and 5 oranges, and Jane is consuming 6 apples and 5 oranges. At this allocation, Joe's marginal utility of apples is 3, and his marginal utility of oranges is 5. Jane's marginal utility of apples is 6, and her marginal utility of oranges is 10. The current price of apples is R4 per unit and the current price of oranges is R5 per unit. To reach a competitive equilibrium, the required price adjustment is: A. A decrease in the orange price relative to the apple price. B. A decrease in the apple price relative to the orange price. C. No change in the relative prices. D. An increase in both prices.
Below is an edgeworth box of two individuals, Ross and Rosa, in the consumption of two goods, X and Y 1. Consider allocations b-f (meaning points a, b, and f). Which allocations(s)A. are better for Ross than “a” (ignoring Rosa)?B. are better for Rosa than “a” (ignoring Ross)?C. are worse for both Ross and Rosa than “a”?D. are better for both Ross and Rosa than “a”?E. are Pareto superior to “a”?2. Suppose that the initial allocation is point a between Ross and Rosa.A. Discuss how Ross’s condition be made better off without harming Rosa(i.e., Rosa maintains her level of utility).B. Illustrate this in a separate diagram and label point/s as necessary (also,if other point/s will have to be made or incorporated).3. Consider once again that the initial allocation is point a. A. Discuss (very briefly) how point d is reached as a Pareto efficientallocation between Ross and Rosa.B. illustrate this condition in a separate diagram.4. Consider points b, c, d, and e. Now plot the utility…
Explain why an economy in which airlines charge different passengers different prices for the same flight will not have exchange efficiency. b. Going back to our two good (Apples, Oranges), two person (Ed, Mary) economy, suppose that at a given allocation, Ed’s MRSAO is 3 and Mary’s MRSAO is 1. Use proof by contradiction to show that this allocation is not exchange efficient. Identify a trade that will increase the utility of Ed and Mary. Explain. Show this graphically (with indifference curves). Going back to our two good (Apples, Oranges), two person (Ed, Mary) economy, suppose that at a given allocation, Ed’s MRSAO is 3 and Mary’s MRSAO is 1. Use proof by contradiction to show that this allocation is not exchange efficient. Identify a trade that will increase the utility of Ed and Mary. Explain. Show this graphically (with indifference curves).
Amy and Lela have following preferences for apples, pears and bananas where > means "preferred to." Amy: apple > pear > banana Lela: banana > apple > pear Assume there is one apple, one banana and one pear to divide between Amy and Lela and that they have no other goods. For each of the following allocations, say whether it is (Pareto) efficient or inefficient. 1. Amy gets the apple and the pear and Lela gets the banana [ Select ] ["Efficient", "Inefficient"] 2. Amy gets the banana and Lela gets the apple and the pear [ Select ] ["Efficient", "Inefficient"] 3. Amy gets the pear, apple and banana and Lela gets nothing [ Select ] ["Efficient", "Inefficient"]
If an allocation is Pareto optimal and if indifference curves between the two goods have no kinks, then (Select all that applies) Group of answer choices a. two consumers who consume both goods must have the same MRS between them, but consumers may consume the goods in different ratios. b. two consumers with the same income who consume both goods must have the same MRS, but if their incomes differ, their MRSs may differ. c. any two consumers who consume both goods must consume them in the same ratio. d. for any two consumers who consume both goods, neither will prefer the other consumer’s bundle to his own. e. all consumers receive the bundle that they prefer to any other bundle the economy could produce for them.
Two consumers, Budi and Marry, together have 10 apples and 4 oranges. a. Draw the Edgeworth box that shows the set of feasible allocation for the two individuals and two goods b. Suppose Budi has 5 apples and 1 orange, while Marry has 5 apples and 3 oranges. Identify this allocation in the Edgeworth box c. Suppose Budi and Marry have identical utility functions and assume that this utility function exhibits positive marginal utilities for both apples and oranges and a diminishing marginal rate of substitution of apples and oranges. Could the allocation in part (b) be economically efficient?
A consumer has $100 to spend on craft beer and Schweinefleischaft (pork shanks). Suppose craft beercosts $10 per 4-pack if the customer purchases up to five 4-packs. After that, it is $5 per 4-pack. SupposeSchweinefleischaft is $5 per order of pork shanks.(a) Draw the budget constraint for this consumer, with craft beer on the horizontal axis and Schweine-fleischaft on the vertical axis.(b) Will the consumer ever purchase exactly five 4-packs of craft beer? Explain why, using both thegraph in part (a) and words.
Brienne starts with 10 food and 10 clothing. Jaime starts with 10 food and 20 clothing.1. Represent the initial allocation in an Edgeworth box.2. Brienne regards the two goods as 1-for-1 substitutes, while Jaime regards the two goodsas 1-for-1 complements. In your Edgeworth Box, shade the allocations that are Paretosuperior to the initial allocation.
Explain the statement true or false. Give an example of a person's economic situation to explain the solution. "It is possible to have a Pareto efficient allocation where someone is worse off than she is at an allocation that is not Pareto efficient"