Green, a police officer, suspected that Brown was engaged in illegal racketeering activities. To obtain evidence of Brown’s illegal conduct, Green place a bug in Brown’s home without a warrant. Green may have violated which of Brown’s constitutional rights? A. Fourteenth Amendments rights. B. Fifth Amendments rights. C. Sixth Amendments rights. D. Fourth Amendments rights.

Green, a police officer, suspected that Brown was engaged in illegal racketeering activities. To obtain evidence of Brown’s illegal conduct, Green place a bug in Brown’s home without a warrant. Green may have violated which of Brown’s constitutional rights? A. Fourteenth Amendments rights. B. Fifth Amendments rights. C. Sixth Amendments rights. D. Fourth Amendments rights.

Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305224414

Author:JENNINGS

Publisher:JENNINGS

Chapter20: Management Of Employee Welfare

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

During an internal investigation, Black, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed Green, a fraud suspect. Although Green wanted to leave in the middle of the interview, Black blocked the exit and prevented him from leaving. Green subsequently confessed to committing fraud. If, under these facts, Green files a lawsuit for false imprisonment against Black, Black will likely: A. Win the case because the qualified business privilege protects investigators conducting internal investigations. B. Win the case because Green confessed to the fraud. C. Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Green without consent or legal justification. D. Lose the cans because Green did not leave the interview.
If you are notified that one of your clients is being investigated by the Serious Crimes Agency, a. It doesn't matter to the Crime Agency whether you tell him or not b. It makes no difference whether you tell him or not c. You have a duty to tell the client d. You have a duty not to tell the client
Cartage Inc. agrees to pick up two truckloads of housewares for Discount Corporation and store the contents to be delivered later. After Cartage unloads the goods at its storage facility, some of them disappear from the loading dock. A court will presume that a. the goods were stolen through no fault of Cartage. b. the warehouse is in a high-crime area. c. Cartage was negligent. d. Discount was negligent
During the interview of a suspect in an embezzlement case, several common themes are developed that make the offense seem morally acceptable to the suspect. Which of the following is NOT commonly used with embezzlers and other fraud offenders? A. “Borrowing” versus “stealing” B. “Did it for the family” C. “Not being paid enough” D. “Protesting an unjust law”
The exclusionary rule: A. Prohibits a party from testifying about the contents of a document without producing the document itself. B. Refers to the warnings advising suspects that they have the right not to answer questions and the right to legal counsel during an investigation. C. Provides that, if the government violates an individual’s constitutional rights during an investigation, if cannot prosecute the person whose rights were violated. D. Provides that, if evidence is unconstitutionally seized, that evidence cannot be used in a criminal prosecution against the person whose rights were violated.
Which of the following statements about the Commissioner’s powers is most correct? a. The Commissioner cannot request a taxpayer to provide information in writing. b. The Commissioner can remove documents from a taxpayer’s premises. c. The Commissioner is entitled to access a taxpayer’s premises at any reasonable time without notice. d. The Commissioner needs to obtain a search warrant in order to enter a taxpayer’s premises.
Although Andersen’s conviction was overturned, do you believe that its employees acted in an ethical manner?
Which of the following is NOT a possible legal risk that can arise because of a fraud investigation conducted in an improper manner? A. Forcible entry and detainer. B. Invasion of privacy. C. Defamation. D. Malicious prosecution.
Should the SEC and the Department of Justice have tried Andersen as a firm, or should they have targeted specific individuals who had engaged in acts the two bodies believed to be unlawful?
which of the following is not a specific risk to individual for violations of AML Laws? Civil Penalties,, loss of passport, termination of employment or criminal penalties
Boracay wrote a complete promissory note payable to bearer. The note was stolen and his signature forged. It ends up in the hands of a holder in due course. Which of the following is true? a. Boracay is not liable because the forged signature is inoperative. b. Boracay can set up the defense of want of delivery of a complete instrument. c. Boracay is liable because he is an indorser. d. Boracay is liable to a holder in due course.