Mr. Asim is an Accounts Officer in Atlas Industries LLC which is a popular Bicycle manufacturing company in Muscat. As an accounts officer Mr. Asim should follow all the fundamental principles of ethics related to his profession. Which one of the following acts of Mr. Asim may leads to intimidation threat? O a. He has financial or other interests. O b. He is too sympathetic to the interests of others. O c He promotes the position of his employer. O d. He is unduly influenced by others.

Mr. Asim is an Accounts Officer in Atlas Industries LLC which is a popular Bicycle manufacturing company in Muscat. As an accounts officer Mr. Asim should follow all the fundamental principles of ethics related to his profession. Which one of the following acts of Mr. Asim may leads to intimidation threat? O a. He has financial or other interests. O b. He is too sympathetic to the interests of others. O c He promotes the position of his employer. O d. He is unduly influenced by others.

Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305224414

Author:JENNINGS

Publisher:JENNINGS

Chapter10: Cyberlaw, Social Media, And Privacy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Amy is a salesperson for ABC Company. Although ABC never expressly authorized her to collect payments (cash and checks) from the customers, she routinely does so for some of her long standing customers and submits them to ABC, who accepted payment without issue. One day, Amy collects cash from one of her customers and runs off. The customer sues ABC Company. If ABC is liable, it is because Amy has a. apparent authority b. implied authority c. no authority d. express authority
Justine is an accountant in the accounting department of Modern Industries, Inc. Justine has just discovered evidence that some of the corporation's marketing managers have been wrongfully inflating their expense reports in order to obtain higher reimbursements from the firm. According to the understanding and acceptance of the basic principles and concepts of ethical conduct, what should Justine do upon discovering this evidence? a. Notify the marketing managers involved. b. Notify the controller. c. Ignore the evidence because she is not part of the Marketing Department. d. Notify the president of the corporation.
John works as a manager in the Aster office of an international public accounting firm. His father has just taken a position as a purchasing agent for one of the public accounting firm’s Aster clients. Has Mr. John’s independence been impaired with respect to this audit client? Has the public accounting firm’s independence been impaired if John does not work on the audit?
Mr. George faced an ethical dilemma when his manager ordered him to send the customers data to outsiders without permission of customers. Mr. George followed the order of his manager. How he can he justify his action? a. His action is in accordance with the law of his country b. His action is based on the principle of non-maleficence c. His action is based on ethical norms of the society d. His action is based on a lack of freedom of choice and free will
Marley goes outside the duties of her agency in negotiating a business contract between her principal and a customer. Which of the following is true? A. Even if the principal ratifies the contract Marley made, it does not have to pay her for the work. B. If the principal disavows the contract Marley made, it still must pay for the work. C. If the principal ratifies the contract Marley made, it must pay her for the work. D. The principal is required to ratify the contract Marley made, and also to pay her for her work.
Mark Buffalo works for a mid-size accounting firm in Boston. One day he overhears a colleague talking to a friend on his cellphone. Mark gasps when he realizes the colleague is sharing one of their client's confidential information, likely as an insider trading tip. As a member of the AICPA, Mark is required to report this discreditable act to the Boston chapter of the AICPA. Select one: True False
In one of the following situations, the member acted properly. Which one? Group of answer choices a. Joe was providing consulting services to client Lowery Company and in that capacity learned trade secrets that he used to convince Richter Corporation to hire him as a consultant who could help Richter compete against Lowery. b. Fiona prepared a joint tax return for Tom and Pam, a married couple. When Tom and Pam got into a vicious divorce proceeding, Fiona helped Pam, whom she perceived to be the wronged party, and refused to share any information with Tom, whom she thought was a bad husband. c. Han prepared corporate income tax returns for Nadle Corporation until he became uncomfortable with how aggressive in seeking deductions Nadle was asking him to be. He“fired” Nadle as a client. When Nadle sought to replace Han with Jennifer, she called Han and asked: “What can you tell me about Nadle?” Han replied: “Well, I think you should ask Nadle to grant me permission to speak…
Mr. Coco Knot is a company accountant and is confused about the ethical conduct that should be followed by him as he is facing a particular dilemma. Please explain to him what he should do and give justifications. ‘My company turns a blind eye to fiddling expenses’ - Coco Knot THE DILEMMA I am a company accountant and I feel uncomfortable that my company seems to turn a blind eye to some employees fiddling expenses. I raised it initially with the employees and then with the financial director, who said that she would rather not confront the employees as they are high-performing sales executives.
During an internal investigation, Black, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed Green, a fraud suspect. Although Green wanted to leave in the middle of the interview, Black blocked the exit and prevented him from leaving. Green subsequently confessed to committing fraud. If, under these facts, Green files a lawsuit for false imprisonment against Black, Black will likely: A. Win the case because the qualified business privilege protects investigators conducting internal investigations. B. Win the case because Green confessed to the fraud. C. Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Green without consent or legal justification. D. Lose the cans because Green did not leave the interview.