How much is the Gross Profit/Loss Realized in 2018? Celestial Holdings Co. began constructing a condominium on January 1, 2017 for a contract price of P1,250,000. The entity has assured collection of its contract and the costs can be reliably estimated. For the year ended December 31, 2018, Celestial billed its client an additional 60% of the contract price. Data relating to the construction are as follows: 2017 2018 2019 Construction in Progress Estimated Cost to Complete 300,000 Cost Incurred 250,000 600,000 112,500 Excess of CIP over PB 25,000 (125,00)

How much is the Gross Profit/Loss Realized in 2018? Celestial Holdings Co. began constructing a condominium on January 1, 2017 for a contract price of P1,250,000. The entity has assured collection of its contract and the costs can be reliably estimated. For the year ended December 31, 2018, Celestial billed its client an additional 60% of the contract price. Data relating to the construction are as follows: 2017 2018 2019 Construction in Progress Estimated Cost to Complete 300,000 Cost Incurred 250,000 600,000 112,500 Excess of CIP over PB 25,000 (125,00)

Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And Analysis

3rd Edition

ISBN:9781337788281

Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach

Publisher:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach

Chapter17: Advanced Issues In Revenue Recognition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 19RE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

On March 1, 2019, Elkhart enters into a new contract to build a specialized warehouse for 7 million. The promise to transfer the warehouse is determined to be a performance obligation. The contract states that if the warehouse is usable by November 30, 2019, Elkhart will receive a bonus of 600,000. For every week after November 30 that the warehouse is not usable, the bonus will decrease by 150,000. Elkhart provides the following completion schedule: Required: 1. Assume that Elkhart uses the expected value approach. What amount should Elkhart use for the transaction price? 2. Assume that Elkhart uses the most likely amount approach. What amount should Elkhart use for the transaction price? 3. Next Level What is the purpose of assessing whether a constraint on the variable consideration exists?
Koolman Construction Company began work on a contract in 2019. The contract price is 3,000,000, and the company determined that its performance obligation was satisfied over time. Other information relating to the contract is as follows: Required: 1. Compute the gross profit or loss recognized in 2019 and 2020. 2. Prepare the appropriate sections of the income statement and ending balance sheet for each year.
On January 1, 2019, Mopps Corp. agrees to provide Conklin Company 3 years of cleaning and janitorial services. The contract sets the price at 12,000 per year, which is the normal standalone price that Mopps charges. On December 31, 2020, Mopps and Conklin agree to modify the contract. Mopps reduces the fee for the third year to 10,000, and Conklin agrees to a 4-year extension that will extend services through December 31, 2024, at a price of 15,000 per year. At the time that the contract is modified, Mopps is charging other customers 13,500 for the cleaning and janitorial service. Required: Should Mopps and Conklin treat the modification as a separate contract? If so how should Mopps account for the contract modification on December 31, 2020? Support your opinion by discussing the application to this case of the factors that need to be considered for determining the accounting for contract modifications.
On October 1, 2019, Grahams WeedFeed Inc. signs a contract to maintain the grounds for BigData Corp. The contract ends on March 31, 2020, and has a monthly payment of 3,200. The contract does not include any stipulations for additional periods. On June 1, Grahams WeedFeed and BigData sign a new 12-month contract that is retroactive to April 1, 2020. The monthly fee for the new contract is 4,000 per month and is also retroactive to April 1, 2020. During April and May of 2020, while the new contract was being negotiated, Grahams Weed Feed continued to maintain the grounds, and BigData continued to pay 3,200 per month. BigData was satisfied with Grahams WeedFeeds performance, and the only issue during negotiations was the monthly fee. Required: Determine if a valid contract exists between Grahams WeedFeed and BigData during April and May 2020.