If a firm has only independent projects, a constant WACC, and projects with normal cash flows, the NPV and IRR methods always lead to identical capital budgeting decisions. What does this imply about the choice between IRR and NPV? If each of the assumptions were changed (one by one), how would your answer change?

If a firm has only independent projects, a constant WACC, and projects with normal cash flows, the NPV and IRR methods always lead to identical capital budgeting decisions. What does this imply about the choice between IRR and NPV? If each of the assumptions were changed (one by one), how would your answer change?

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter11: Capital Budgeting And Risk

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTD

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Discuss the following statement: If a firm has only independent projects, a constant WACC,and projects with normal cash flows, the NPV and IRR methods will always lead to identicalcapital budgeting decisions. What does this imply about the choice between IRR and NPV?If each of the assumptions were changed (one by one), how would your answer change?
Suppose a firm uses the WACC as the single hurdle rate in determining the value of capital budgeting projects rather than using risk adjusted hurdle rates. Choose the statement that actually completes the sentence describing the possible outcomes for the firm: the firm will tend to Accept profitable, low risk projects and reject unprofitable, high risk projects Accept profitable, low risk projects and accept unprofitable, high risk projects Reject profitable, low risk projects and reject unprofitable high risk projects Become less risky overtime Reject profitable, low risk projects and accept unprofitable, high risk projects
The WACC is used as the discount rate to evaluate various capital budgeting projects. However, it is important to realize that the WACC is only an appropriate discount rate for a project of average risk—in other words, a project that has the same beta as the company. If a project has less risk than the overall company risk, it should be evaluated with a lower discount rate; if a project is riskier than the overall company risk, it should be evaluated using a discount rate higher than the company WACC. Analyze the cost of capital situations of the following company cases, and answer the specific questions that finance professionals need to address. Consider the case of Turnbull Co. Turnbull Co. has a target capital structure of 45% debt, 4% preferred stock, and 51% common equity. It has a before-tax cost of debt of 11.1%, and its cost of preferred stock is 12.2%. If Turnbull can raise all of its equity capital from retained earnings, its cost of common equity will be 14.7%.…
Suppose a firm uses a constant WACC in determining the value of capital budgeting projects rather than using a project beta. The firm will tend to A. accept profitable, low risk projects and reject unprofitable, high risk projects B. accept profitable, low risk projects and accept unprofitable, high risk projects C. reject profitable, low risk projects and accept unprofitable, high risk projects D. reject profitable , low risk projects and reject unprofitable, high risk projects
1. In the context of capital budgeting, what is an opportunity cost?2. Given the choice, would a firm prefer to use MACRS depreciation or straight-line depreciation? Why?3. In our capital budgeting examples, we assumed that a firm would recover all of the working capital it invested in a project. Is this a reasonable assumption? When might it not be valid?4. Suppose a financial manager is quoted as saying, “Our firm uses the stand-alone principle. Because we treat projects like minifirms in our evaluation process, we include financing costs because they are relevant at the firm level.” Critically evaluate this statement.
Companies often use several methods to evaluate the project’s cash flows and each of them has its benefits and disadvantages. Based on your understanding of the capital budgeting evaluation methods, which of the following conclusions about capital budgeting are valid? Check all that apply. The discounted payback period improves on the regular payback period by accounting for the time value of money. For most firms, the reinvestment rate assumption in the NPV is more realistic than the assumption in the IRR. Because the MIRR and NPV use the same reinvestment rate assumption, they always lead to the same accept/reject decision for mutually exclusive projects. True or False: Sophisticated firms use only the NPV method in capital budgeting decisions.
1. Why is the NPV considered to be theoretically superior to all other capital budgeting techniques?Reconcile this result with the prevalence of the use of IRR in practice. How would you respond toyour CFO if she instructed you to use the IRR technique to make capital budgeting decisions onprojects with cash flow streams that alternate between inflows and outflows?
Smaller firms often use Payback, as opposed to NPV or some other more sophisticated capital budgeting technique. Why do you suppose that occurs?
Explain what a discounted cash flow method of making capital budgeting decisions is. Why are discounted cash flow methods superior to other methods? What are the risks related to using discounted cash flow methods? What a project profitability index? What does it measure? Why is it used? What is the primary criticism of the payback and simple rate of return methods of making capital budget decisions? What are the benefits in using these methods? Should companies continue to use these methods? Why or why not? What role, if any, should qualitative factors play in capital budgeting decisions? Explain your reasoning for your answer Discuss some of the major benefits to be gained from budgeting.
You are reviewing a profitable investment project that has a conventional cash flow pattern but the board of directors requires a smaller investment. If the cash flows for the project, initial outlay, and future after-tax cash flows all half, then the IRR would: Stay the same and the NPV would decrease. Decrease and the NPV would decrease. Stay the same and the NPV would stay the same. Increase and the NPV would increase.