If people generally believe that "you get what you pay for," it is reasonable for them to: Multiple Choice O O make every effort to get complete information about a product before making a purchase to make sure that the purchase is opti assume that an expensive item is of higher quality, creating the possibility of an upward-sloping demand curve. assume that a cheaper brand is always a better deal than expensive brands. assume that an expensive item is of higher quality, which eliminates the possibility of an upward-sloping demand curve.

If people generally believe that "you get what you pay for," it is reasonable for them to: Multiple Choice O O make every effort to get complete information about a product before making a purchase to make sure that the purchase is opti assume that an expensive item is of higher quality, creating the possibility of an upward-sloping demand curve. assume that a cheaper brand is always a better deal than expensive brands. assume that an expensive item is of higher quality, which eliminates the possibility of an upward-sloping demand curve.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter18: Asymmetric Information

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 18.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

True/False/Uncertain: 1. In taking an exam, Atack, a rational student, allocates his time to the various questions so as to equalize hismarginal point utility per minute on all questions. 2. The marginal utility of food to Zecher depends only on the amount of food (and not on the amount ofhousing) and the marginal utility declines as more food is consumed; likewise for housing. Therefore,both food and housing are normal goods. (Hint: Express the optimality condition for Zecher’s [UMP], MUF/MUH = PF/PH. Notice that PF/PH is fixed. If all of an increase in income is spent on F, can the equality be maintained?)
a. A young connoisseur has $600 to spend to build a smallwine cellar. She enjoys two vintages in particular: a 2001French Bordeaux (wF) at $40 per bottle and a less expensive 2005 California varietal wine (wC) priced at $8. Ifher utility is U (wF, wC))=wF2/3 w C1/3 ,then how much of each wine should she purchase?b. When she arrived at the wine store, this young oenologistdiscovered that the price of the French Bordeaux hadfallen to $20 a bottle because of a decrease in the valueof the euro. If the price of the California wine remainsstable at $8 per bottle, how much of each wine shouldour friend purchase to maximize utility under thesealtered conditions?c. Explain why this wine fancier is better off in part (b)than in part (a). How would you put a monetary value onthis utility increase?
PLS ANS 7 URGENT H = ($100, 0.4; $200, 0.6) K = ($120,p, $300, 1- p) 6. EV(H) =EV(K) What value of p makes this statement true? 7. Carol owns prospect H and is interested in selling it. Her utility of wealth function is given by u(x) = x^0.5 . What is the lowest price for which Carol would be willing to sell prospect H?
Suppose that the University of Alabama and Clemson are making spending decisions for theupcoming year. Assume that Alabama is currently spending $15 million on their recruiting andfacilities, and Clemson is spending $10 million. Each team has an additional $5 million to spendor keep as profits. If they both choose to not spend the additional $5 million then Alabama hasa 60% chance of getting the highest quality quarterback recruit to commit to them (getting thecommitment of the player is the goal). However, if they both choose to spend the additional $5million then there is a 57% chance that Alabama gets the high quality quarterback to commit. IfAlabama spends the additional $5 million but Clemson doesn’t then there is a 67% chanceAlabama gets the recruit. However, if Alabama does NOT spend the additional $5million butClemson does then there is a 50% change either team gets the recruit’s commitment. Setup thepayoff matrix and label the players, their strategies, and their payoffs, and…
Suppose Martha earns an of income 400 Birr currently, and her utility function is given by: U(m) = 4m, where m represents income. She has two options: Option 1: to buy a share. If she is successful her income will be 700 Birr and if she is not successful her income will be 100 Birr. Option 2: to do nothing and keep on earning 400 Birr. Assuming that success and failure are equally likely, a) What would be her expected income if she buys the share? b) What would be her expected utility of buying the share? c) Would Martha buy the share? Why? and Is Martha risk averse, risk lover or risk neutral?
Choice under uncertainty. Consider a coin-toss game in which the player gets $30 if they win, and $5 if they lose. The probability of winning is 50%. (a) Alan is (just) willing to pay $15 to play this game. What is Alan’s attitude to risk? Show your work. (b) Assume a market with many identical Alans, who are all forced to pay $15 to play this coin-toss game. An insurer offers an insurance policy to protect the Alans from the risk. What would be the fair (zero profit) premium on this policy? can you help me for par (b) plase?
Choice under uncertainty. Consider a coin-toss game in which the player gets $30 if they win, and $5 if they lose. The probability of winning is 50%. (a) Alan is (just) willing to pay $15 to play this game. What is Alan’s attitude to risk? Show your work.(b) Assume a market with many identical Alans, who are all forced to pay $15 to play this coin-toss game. An insurer offers an insurance policy to protect the Alans from the risk. What would be the fair (zero profit) premium on this policy? i need help with question B please.
Utility functions incorporate a decision maker’s attitude towards risk. Let’s assume that the following utilities were assessed for Danica Wary. x u(x) -$2,000 0 -$500 62 $0 75 $400 80 $5,000 100 Would a risk neutral decision maker be willing to take the following deal: 30% chance of winning $5,000, 40% chance of winning $400 and a 30% chance of losing $2,000? Using the utilities given in the table above, determine whether Danica would be willing to take the deal described in part a? Is Danica risk averse or is she a risk taker? What is her risk premium for this deal?
a Suppose you are given a choice between thefollowing options:A1: Win $30 for sureA2: 80% chance of winning $45 and 20% chance ofA2: winning nothing B1: 25% chance of winning $30B2: 20% chance of winning $45Most people prefer A1 to A2 and B2 to B1. Explainwhy this behavior violates the assumption that decisionmakers maximize expected utility.b Now suppose you play the following game: You havea 75% chance of winning nothing and a 25% chance ofplaying the second stage of the game. If you reach thesecond stage, you have a choice of two options (C1 andC2), but your choice must be made now, before youreach the second stage.C1: Win $30 for sureC2: 80% chance of winning $45 13.5 Bayes’ Rule and Decision Trees 767Most people choose C1 over C2 and B2 to B1 (from part(a)). Explain why this again violates the assumption ofexpected utility maximization. Tversky and Kahneman(1981) speculate that most people are attracted to thesure $30 in the second stage, even though the secondstage may never be…
If a doctor knows that an insurance company will pay for most of a patient's bill, the doctor has more of an incentive to require additional medical procedures and tests, even if the patient may not require them. This is an example of O A. adverse selection. O B. the principal-agent problem. O C. asymmetric information. O D. moral hazard.
Suppose Jessica has two choices: receive $12000 and 30 utils or take a gamble that has a 55% chance of a $20000 and 45 utils, and a 45% chance of a $0 payoff and zero utility. Assuming Jessica is a utility maximizer, what will she likely choose? a) Jessica will not take the gamble b) Jessica will take the gamble c) It cannot be determined d) Jessica is indifferent
Kindly assist on the questions below 1) Dan is an expected utility maximizer with a utility function over wealth given by : u(w) = 2√w +10 Dan faces a gamble of where there are equal chances to win $9 or $16. The certainty equivalent of this gamble is a) 3.5 b) 17 c)2√13 +10 d) not enough information to compute e) 20 2) Consider a expected utility maximizing consumer with preferences represented by u(w)= w2 If they face a loss that occurs with a 15% probability (select all that applies) a) fair insurance will be priced at 15% per dollar b) fair insurance will leave them with wealth equal to their certainty equivalent c)they will choose to fully insure themselves with fair insurance d)they will always buy more insurance than a risk neutral person