In 2009, Bratz, Inc.’s net profit before tax was P35 million while its operating expenses was P31 million. In 2010, its net profit before tax was P40 million and its operating expenses was P38 million. It did not declare dividends for 2009 and 2010. And it has no proposed capital expenditures for 2011 and the immediate future. May Bratz be subject to the improperly accumulated tax on its retained profits for 2009 and 2010? a. Yes, since the accumulated amounts are reasonable for operations in relation to what it usually needed annually. B. b. No, because the taxpayer is not shown to be a publicly-listed corporation, a bank, or an insurance company. c. No, because there is no showing that the taxpayer's 2009 and 2010 net profit before tax exceeded its paid-up capital. d. Yes, since the accumulation is not reasonably necessary for the immediate needs of the business.
In 2009, Bratz, Inc.’s net profit before tax was P35 million while its operating expenses was P31 million. In 2010, its net profit before tax was P40 million and its operating expenses was P38 million. It did not declare dividends for 2009 and 2010. And it has no proposed capital expenditures for 2011 and the immediate future. May Bratz be subject to the improperly accumulated tax on its retained profits for 2009 and 2010? a. Yes, since the accumulated amounts are reasonable for operations in relation to what it usually needed annually. B. b. No, because the taxpayer is not shown to be a publicly-listed corporation, a bank, or an insurance company. c. No, because there is no showing that the taxpayer's 2009 and 2010 net profit before tax exceeded its paid-up capital. d. Yes, since the accumulation is not reasonably necessary for the immediate needs of the business.
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course List)
13th Edition
ISBN:9781337395083
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Publisher:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Chapter6: Accounting For Financial Management
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8P
Related questions
Question
In 2009, Bratz, Inc.’s net profit before tax was P35 million while its operating expenses was P31 million. In 2010, its net profit before tax was P40 million and its operating expenses was P38 million. It did not declare dividends for 2009 and 2010. And it has no proposed capital expenditures for 2011 and the immediate future. May Bratz be subject to the improperly accumulated tax on its retained profits for 2009 and 2010?
a. Yes, since the accumulated amounts are reasonable for operations in relation to what it usually needed annually. B.
b. No, because the taxpayer is not shown to be a publicly-listed corporation, a bank, or an insurance company.
c. No, because there is no showing that the taxpayer's 2009 and 2010 net profit before tax exceeded its paid-up capital.
d. Yes, since the accumulation is not reasonably necessary for the immediate needs of the business.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395083
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395083
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis…
Finance
ISBN:
9781285190907
Author:
James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning