In each of the theories of capital structure, the cost of equity increases as the amount ofdebt increases. So why don't financial managers use as little debt as possible to keep the costof equity down? After all, aren't financial managers supposed to maximize the value of afirm?

Capital Structure means a combination of different sources of finance used by a corporation to…

Answered: In each of the theories of capital…

Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis and Valuation

8th Edition

ISBN:9781285190907

Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw

Publisher:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw

Chapter11: Risk-adjusted Expected Rates Of Return And The Dividends Valuation Approach

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6QE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Modigliani and Miller assumed that firms do not grow. How does positive growth change their conclusions about the value of the levered firm and its cost of capital?
Define the term capital intensity. Explain how a decline in capital intensity would affect the AFN, other things held constant. Would economies of scale combined with rapid growth affect capital intensity, other things held constant? Also, explain how changes in each of the following would affect AFN, holding other things constant: the growth rate, the amount of accounts payable, the profit margin, and the payout ratio.
In each of the theories of capital structure, the cost of equity increases as the amount of debt increases. So why don't financial managers use as little debt as possible to keep the cost of equity down? After all, aren't financial managers supposed to maximize the value of a firm?
The cost of equity rises as the quantity of debt rises in each of the capital structure theories. So, why don't financial managers employ as little debt as feasible to keep equity costs low? After all, aren't finance managers expected to increase a company's value?
Can you please assist by clearly answering the question. Please dont copy and paste answers that have been already posted. In each of the theories of capital structure the cost of equity risesas the amount of debt increases. So why don’t financial managers useas little debt as possible to keep the cost of equity down? After all,isn’t the goal of the firm to maximize share value and minimizeshareholder costs?
Which of the following is most correct about the cost of capital? The cost of debt reflects the interest rates on debt capital before taking into account the tax effects. Cost of capital is affected by the required rates of return of each of the source of capital, regardless of the capital structure. The capital asset pricing model is the most widely used model to estimate the cost of common equity. To minimize the cost of capital, firms should borrow more than their capacity because increasing the lower cost of debt yields the lowest cost of capital, thus, enhances shareholder value.
In a few sentences, answer the following question as completely as you can. Why should financial decision makers obtain a good estimate of a firm’s cost of capital? What are the consequences of using a discount rate that is higher or lower than a firm’s true required return?
In the case of a perfect capital market, according to Modigliani and Miller Proposition I and II, what is the optimal capitalstructure? When you introduce taxes, how can leverage alter the incentives of managers?
Is this statement true or false? Give a reason for your answer. "The bird-in-hand theory suggests that a company can reduce its cost of equity capital by reducing its dividend payout ratio."
According to Modigliani and Miller, what happens to the cost of equity when the firm increases its leverage? What happens to the firm's WACC?
When establishing their optimal capital structure, firms should strive to minimize the amount of debt financing used minimize the weighted average cost of capital none of the choices maximize the marginal cost of capital
Consider the following statements: The main lesson to be learned from the Modigliani and Miller theory of capital structure assuming perfect markets and no taxation is that: I. a firm cannot affect its value by changing its capital structure II. the value of the firm is determined by its total cash flows III. the weighted average cost of capital increases as financial leverage decreases IV. the weighted average cost of capital decreases as financial leverage decreases V. the weighted average cost of capital remains the same whatever the level of financial leverage. Which of the statements is true? Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arrow keys to select an answer. a I and V only I, Il and V only II, II and IV only None of the above I and Il only

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis…

Finance

ISBN:

9781285190907

Author:

James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395083

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Finance

ISBN:

9781337514835

Author:

MOYER

Publisher:

CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT

Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis…

Finance

ISBN:

9781285190907

Author:

James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395083

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Finance

ISBN:

9781337514835

Author:

MOYER

Publisher:

CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

In each of the theories of capital structure, the cost of equity increases as the amount of debt increases. So why don't financial managers use as little debt as possible to keep the cost of equity down? After all, aren't financial managers supposed to maximize the value of a firm?