In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, an influx of workers from across the border would: a. move the point of production along the production possibility curve. O b. shift the production possibility curve outward and decrease the production of the capital-intensive product. O c. shift the production possibility curve outward and decrease the production of the labour-intensive product. O d. shift the production possibility curve outward, and increase the production of both goods. O e. shift the possibility curve outward and displace pre-existing labour.

In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, an influx of workers from across the border would: a. move the point of production along the production possibility curve. O b. shift the production possibility curve outward and decrease the production of the capital-intensive product. O c. shift the production possibility curve outward and decrease the production of the labour-intensive product. O d. shift the production possibility curve outward, and increase the production of both goods. O e. shift the possibility curve outward and displace pre-existing labour.

Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971509

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter3: Interdependence And The Gains Rrom Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3CQQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The table below presents production schedule of apples and bananas in the country of mistania - assume that these are the only two goods that Mistania produces. Each row represents a specific set of apples and bananas that Mistania could produce. Suppose Mistania was currently at Senario C, producing 10 bananas and 80 apples. According to the data in this table, if Mistania wanted to produc 1 more banana, how many fewer apples will it need to produce? Scenario Bananas Apples A 0 100 B 5 90 C 10 80 D 15 70 E 20 60
. Which country has an absolute advantage in the production of fruit? Which countryhas an absolute advantage in the production of timber?b. Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of fruit? of timber?c. Sketch the PPF’s for both countries.d. Assuming no trading between the two, if both countries wanted to have equalnumbers of feet of timber and baskets of fruit, how would they allocate workers tothe two sectors?e. Show that specialization and trade can move both countries beyond their PPF’s.
It takes Andy 45 minutes to complete a load of laundry and 15 minutes to wrap a present. It takes Bob 60 minutes to complete a load of laundry and 30 minutes to wrap a present. Which of the following statements is true? Select one : O A. Bob's opportunity cost of doing a load of laundry is wrapping 3 presents. O B. Bob has a comparative advantage in doing laundry. O C. Bob has a comparative advantage in wrapping a present. O D. Andy's opportunity cost of wrapping a present is doing 3 loads of laundry. O E. Bob has an absolute advantage in doing laundry.
The idea that an action should be undertaken if and only if the benefits exceed the costs is known as the concept of Oeconomic efficiency. O public welfare maximization. marginal comparative advantage. O monetary construction of values.
a) Draw a production possibilities frontier (PPF) for a society that produces two goods, guns and wheat. Suppose this society has two political parties, party R (who want a strong military) and party L (who want a smaller military). Show points on your diagram that party R and party L chooses. b) Show graphically whether your PPF will change if all the resources used for both the goods were equally suitable for production of guns and wheat? c) Assuming that b stands and if all the resources are used for the production of guns, 20 guns can be produced and if all the resources are used for production of wheat, 80 units of wheat can be produced, then what is the opportunity cost of producing one gun?
The PPF shown in figure SLO-1.3 depicts ___________. decreasing opportunity costs between capital and consumer goodsconstant opportunity costs between capital and consumer goodsincreasing opportunity costs between capital and consumer goodsnon constant opportunity costs between capital and consumer goods
Answer the question on the basis of the following production possibilities data for Gamma and Sigma. All data are in tons. Gamma production possibilities: A B C D E Tea 120 90 60 30 0 Pots 0 30 60 90 120 Sigma production possibilities: A B C D E Tea 40 30 20 10 0 Pots 0 30 60 90 120 What are the limits of the terms of trade between Gamma and Sigma? 1 tea=2 pots to 1 tea=6 pots 1 tea=3 pots to 1 tea=6 pots 1 tea=2 pots to 1 tea=3.5 pots 1 tea=1 pot to 1 tea=3 pots
A nation’s residents can allocate their scarce resources either to producing consumption goods or to producing human capital – that is providing themselves with training and education. The table below displays the production possibilities for this nation: Production Combination Units of Consumption Goods Units of Human Capital A 0 100 B 10 97 C 20 90 D 30 75 E 40 55 F 50 30 G 60 0 Suppose that the nation’s residents currently produce combination “A”. What is the opportunity cost of increasing production of consumption goods by 10 units? By 60 units? Does the law of increasing additional cost hold true for this nation? Why or why not?
The accompanying tables give production possibilities data for Gamma and Sigma. All data are in tons. Gamma's production possibilities A B C D E Tea 120 90 60 30 0 Pots 0 30 60 90 120 Sigma's production possibilities A B C D E Tea 40 30 20 10 0 Pots 0 30 60 90 120 What are the limits of the terms of trade between Gamma and Sigma? Multiple Choice 1 tea = 2 pots to 1 tea = 6 pots 1 tea = 3 pots to 1 tea = 6 pots 1 tea = 2 pots to 1 tea = 3.5 pots 1 tea = 1 pot to 1 tea = 3 pots
Assume an economy producing only two goods (shoes and computers) with a fixed amount of productive resources and technology and employing all its productive resources to the maximum. The maximum output combinations of both goods are given in the table below: Combination Shoes Computers Shoes Computers A 0 1000 B 100 900 C 200 750 D 300 550 E 400 300 F 500 0 iv. How many computers could society produce if it was willing to do without shoes? v. Why are points outside the frontier unattainable? vi. Identify three ways by which the economy can attain the level of production outside the PPF. vii. What happens to the PPF when technological change overwhelmingly favours the production…
The accompanying tables give production possibilities data for Gamma and Sigma. All data are in tons. Gamma's production possibilities A B C D E Tea 120 90 60 30 0 Pots 0 30 60 90 120 Sigma's production possibilities A B C D E Tea 40 30 20 10 0 Pots 0 30 60 90 120 Assume that before specialization and trade, Gamma and Sigma both chose production possibility "C." Now if each specializes according to comparative advantage, the gains from specialization and trade will be Multiple Choice 40 tons of pots. 20 tons of tea and 20 tons of pots. 20 tons of tea. 40 tons of tea.
. Diego and Darnell are roommates. They spend mostof their time studying (of course), but they leavesome time for their favorite activities: making pizzaand brewing root beer. Diego takes 4 hours to brewa gallon of root beer and 2 hours to make a pizza.Darnell takes 6 hours to brew a gallon of root beerand 4 hours to make a pizza.a. What is each roommate’s opportunity cost ofmaking a pizza? Who has the absolute advantagein making pizza? Who has the comparativeadvantage in making pizza?b. If Diego and Darnell trade foods with each other,who will trade away pizza in exchange for rootbeer?c. The price of pizza can be expressed in terms ofgallons of root beer. What is the highest price atwhich pizza can be traded that would make bothroommates better off? What is the lowest price?Explain.