Job 75 incurred the following costs for the manufacture of 200 units of motors:Original cost accumulationDirect materialsDirect laborFactory overhead (150% of direct labor)Direct costs of reworked 10 unitsP 13,20016,00024,000Direct materials2,0003,200Direct laborThe total rework costs were attributable to exacting specifications of Job 75 and thefull rework costs were charged to the specific job.5. The cost of Job 75 wasа. Р316b. Р 266с. Р 280d. P 292

This question require us to cost cost of Job 75. When rework cost is directly attributable to…

Job 75 incurred the following costs for the manufacture of 200 units of motors: Original cost accumulation Direct materials Direct labor P 13,200 16,000 24,000 Factory overhead (150% of direct labor) Direct costs of reworked 10 units Direct materials Direct labor The total rework costs were attributable to exacting specifications of Job 75 and the full rework costs were charged to the specific job. 5. The cost of Job 75 was 2,000 3,200 а. Р316 b. P 266 с. Р 280 d. P 292

Job 75 incurred the following costs for the manufacture of 200 units of motors: Original cost accumulation Direct materials Direct labor P 13,200 16,000 24,000 Factory overhead (150% of direct labor) Direct costs of reworked 10 units Direct materials Direct labor The total rework costs were attributable to exacting specifications of Job 75 and the full rework costs were charged to the specific job. 5. The cost of Job 75 was 2,000 3,200 а. Р316 b. P 266 с. Р 280 d. P 292

Principles of Cost Accounting

17th Edition

ISBN:9781305087408

Author:Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. Mitchell

Publisher:Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. Mitchell

Chapter5: Process Cost Accounting—general Procedures

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 11E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A machine shop manufactures a stainless steel part that is used in an assembled product. Materials charged to a particular jobamounted to 600. At the point of final inspection, it was discoveredthat the material used was inferior to the specifications required bythe engineering department; therefore, all units had to be scrapped. Record the entries required for scrap under each of the following conditions: a. The revenue received for scrap is to be treated as a reductionin manufacturing cost but cannot be identified with a specificjob. The value of stainless steel scrap is stable and estimatedto be 125 for this job. The scrap is sold two months later forcash at the estimated value of 125. b. Revenue received for scrap is to be treated as a reduction inmanufacturing cost but cannot be identified with a specificjob. A firm price is not determinable for the scrap until it issold. It is sold eventually for 75 cash. c. The production job is a special job, and the 85 received onaccount for the scrap is to be treated as a reduction inmanufacturing cost. (A firm price is not determinable for thescrap until it is sold.) d. Only 40 cash was received for the scrap when it was sold inthe following fiscal period. (A firm price is not determinablefor the scrap until it is sold, and the amount to be received forthe scrap is to be treated as other income.)
Original cost accumulation: Direct materials P13,200 Direct labor 16,000 Factory overhead (150% of direct labor) 24,000 Direct costs of reworked 10 units Direct materials 2,000 Direct labor 3,200 The total rework costs were attributable to exacting specifications of Job 75 and the full rework costs were charged to the specific job. The cost per unit of Job 75 was
Simar Company’s Job 888 manufactured 13,750 units that were completed in February at unit costs presented as follows: Direct materials P300 Direct labor 270 Factory overhead (includes an allowance of P15 Spoiled work) 270Final inspection of Job 888 disclosed 1,250 spoiled units, which were sold for P225,000.What would be the unit cost of good units if the spoilage loss is attributable to exacting specifications of Job 004?
Elmer Company’s Job #040335 for the manufacture of 6,600 coats was completed during Marchat the following unit costs:Direct materials P1,500Direct labor 1,000Manufacturing overhead (includes allowances of P50 for spoiled work) 5003,000Final inspection of job #040335 disclosed 600 spoiled coats, which were sold to a jobber forP600,000.29. What would be the unit cost of the good coats produced on job #040335 assuming thatspoilage loss is charged to all production? Attributable to exacting specifications of job#040335?a. 2,950 b. 3,000 c. 3,145 d. 3,200
Elmer Company’s Job #040335 for the manufacture of 6,600 coats was completed during Marchat the following unit costs:Direct materials P1,500Direct labor 1,000Manufacturing overhead (includes allowances of P50 for spoiled work) 5003,000Final inspection of job #040335 disclosed 600 spoiled coats, which were sold to a jobber forP600,000.29. What would be the unit cost of the good coats produced on job #040335 assuming thatspoilage loss is charged to all production? Attributable to exacting specifications of job#040335?a. 2,950 b. 3,000 c. 3,145 d. 3,20030. Using the information in item 29, what is the journal entry to record the disposal of thespoiled coats?a. Cash 600,000Manufacturing overhead 1,200,000Work in process -Job #040335 1,800,000b. Cash 600,000Work in process -Job #040335 600,000c. Cash 600,000Abnormal loss 1,200,000Work in process -Job #040335 1,800,000d. Cash 600,000Manufacturing overhead 1,170,000Work in process -Job #040335 1,170,000
Integrity Company’s Job 1088 manufactured 13,750 units that were completed in February at unit costs presented as follows:Direct materials- P300Direct labor- 270Factory overhead (includes an allowance of P15 spoiled work)- P270Final inspection of Job 1088 disclosed 1,250 spoiled units, which were sold for P225,000.What would be the unit selling price if the spoilage is attributable to exacting specifications of Job 1088 and the entity maintain a gross profit of 50%?
Samar Company’s Job 888 manufactured 13,750 units that were completed in February at unit costs presented as follows: Direct materials P300 Direct labor 270 Factory overhead (includes an allowance of P15 Spoiled work) 270Final inspection of Job 888 disclosed 1,250 spoiled units, which were sold for P225,000.What would be the unit cost of good units if the spoilage loss is attributable to exacting specifications of Job 004? a. 840 b. 889.50 c. 825 d. 862.50
Zea Company’s Job 888 manufactured 13,750 units that were completed in February at unit costs presented as follows: Direct materials $300 Direct labor 270 Factory overhead (includes an allowance of P15 Spoiled work) 270Final inspection of Job 888 disclosed 1,250 spoiled units, which were sold for $225,000.What would be the unit cost of good units if the spoilage loss is attributable to exacting specifications of Job 004?
2. GondolaB Company's Job No. 205 (for the manufacture of 6,600 coats) was completed August, 20M at the following unit costs: Direct materials - P1,500, Direct labor - 1,000, Factory overhead (including allowance of P50 for spoiled work) - 500. Total = P3,000. Final inspection of Job No. 205 disclosed 600 spoiled costs. These were subsequently sold to a jobber for P600,000. Assuming that spoilage loss is chargeable to the particular job, the unit cost of the good coats produced per Job No. 205 must be: P3,145 P2,950 P3,000 P3,150
Nadia Company's Job No. 310 (for the manufacture of 6,600 coats) was completed on September 20 at the following unit costs: Direct materials - $1,500, Direct labor - 1,000, Factory overhead (including allowance of$P50 for spoiled work) - 500. Total = $3,000. Final inspection of Job No. 310 disclosed 600 spoiled costs. These were subsequently sold to a jobber for P600,000. Assuming that spoilage loss is chargeable to the particular job, the unit cost of the good coats produced per Job No. 310 must be:
Martin Company received an order for 25 automatic mixing machines. Because of the order's exacting specifications, it is anticipated that defective and spoiled work will exceed the normal rate. The materials cost per unit is P80; labor cost, P194; and manufacturing overhead for this order is to be applied at 100% of the labor cost. During production, 5 units were found to be defective and required the following total additional costs: materials, P97, labor, P125, and manufacturing overhead at the 100% rate. On final inspection, 2 units were classified as seconds and sold for P400 each, the proceeds being credited to the order. The purchaser has agreed to accept the 23 machines, although the acceptable units are fewer than the number ordered. What is the unit cost of the completed units? (Round-off to the nearest peso) IN A GOOD ACCOUNTING FORM WILL BE GREAT ALSO!
Martin Company received an order for 25 automatic mixing machines. Because of the order's exacting specifications, it is anticipated that defective and spoiled work will exceed the normal rate. The materials cost per unit is P80; labor cost, P194; and manufacturing overhead for this order is to be applied at 100% of the labor cost. During production, 5 units were found to be defective and required the following total additional costs: materials, P97, labor, P125, and manufacturing overhead at the 100% rate. On final inspection, 2 units were classified as seconds and sold for P400 each, the proceeds being credited to the order. The purchaser has agreed to accept the 23 machines, although the acceptable units are fewer than the number ordered. What is the unit cost of the completed units? (Round-off to the nearest peso) ANSWER IN GOOD ACCOUNTING FORM. THANK YOU :)