Leonard, a company that manufactures explosion-proof motors, is considering two alternatives for expanding its international export capacity. Option 1 requires equipment purchases of $940,000 now and $435,000 two years from now, with annual M&O costs of $70,000 in years 1 through 10. Option 2 involves subcontracting some of the production at costs of $230,000 per year beginning now through the end of year 10. Neither option will have a significant salvage value. Use a present worth analysis to determine which option is more attractive at the company's MARR of 14% per year. The present worth of option 1 is $-1621119.5 and that of option 2 is $-1384324 Option 2 is more attractive.

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
14th Edition
ISBN:9781337514835
Author:MOYER
Publisher:MOYER
Chapter11: Capital Budgeting And Risk
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 13P
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Topic Video
Question
Leonard, a company that manufactures explosion-proof motors, is considering two alternatives for expanding its international export
capacity. Option 1 requires equipment purchases of $940,000 now and $435,000 two years from now, with annual M&O costs
of $70,000 in years 1 through 10. Option 2 involves subcontracting some of the production at costs of $230,000 per year beginning
now through the end of year 10. Neither option will have a significant salvage value. Use a present worth analysis to determine which
option is more attractive at the company's MARR of 14% per year.
The present worth of option 1 is $ -1621119.5
and that of option 2 is $ -1384324
Option 2
is more attractive.
Transcribed Image Text:Leonard, a company that manufactures explosion-proof motors, is considering two alternatives for expanding its international export capacity. Option 1 requires equipment purchases of $940,000 now and $435,000 two years from now, with annual M&O costs of $70,000 in years 1 through 10. Option 2 involves subcontracting some of the production at costs of $230,000 per year beginning now through the end of year 10. Neither option will have a significant salvage value. Use a present worth analysis to determine which option is more attractive at the company's MARR of 14% per year. The present worth of option 1 is $ -1621119.5 and that of option 2 is $ -1384324 Option 2 is more attractive.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Capital Budgeting
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Finance
ISBN:
9781337514835
Author:
MOYER
Publisher:
CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Financial Management: Theory & Practice
Financial Management: Theory & Practice
Finance
ISBN:
9781337909730
Author:
Brigham
Publisher:
Cengage
Corporate Fin Focused Approach
Corporate Fin Focused Approach
Finance
ISBN:
9781285660516
Author:
EHRHARDT
Publisher:
Cengage
Excel Applications for Accounting Principles
Excel Applications for Accounting Principles
Accounting
ISBN:
9781111581565
Author:
Gaylord N. Smith
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Accounting
ISBN:
9781947172609
Author:
OpenStax
Publisher:
OpenStax College
Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course …
Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course …
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305627734
Author:
Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning