ΜΑΤΗ 151 12. Solve for x: Exam #1 -51og (-10x +6) +9 =-11 13 Find the solution of the equation 82x-3 216. Write your answer in simplest form. 14. Factor completely: 8x2-16x+ 6 Solve for x in the equation -3x2 12x-2 = 0. Write your answer in simple 15 V2x + 4 3 Find the inverse of the function fx)= 16

ΜΑΤΗ 151 12. Solve for x: Exam #1 -51og (-10x +6) +9 =-11 13 Find the solution of the equation 82x-3 216. Write your answer in simplest form. 14. Factor completely: 8x2-16x+ 6 Solve for x in the equation -3x2 12x-2 = 0. Write your answer in simple 15 V2x + 4 3 Find the inverse of the function fx)= 16

College Algebra

1st Edition

ISBN:9781938168383

Author:Jay Abramson

Publisher:Jay Abramson

Chapter6: Exponential And Logarithmic Functions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 44RE: Find the exact solution for 52x3=7x+1. Ifthere isno solution, write no solution.

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Find the exact solution for 52x3=7x+1. Ifthere isno solution, write no solution.
Explain the process for determining whether two radicals are like or unlike. Make sure your answer makes sense for radicals containing both numbers and variables.
Determine whether the statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. Although I can solve 3x + 1/5= 1/4 by first subtracting 1/5 from both sides, I find it easier to begin by multiplying both sides by 20, the least common denominator.
In 2015, the value of the freight, in dollars, that came into Florida was 3.46 x 10(11). The value of the freight, in dollars, that flowed within Orlando was 1.73 x 10(10). How many times larger is the value of the freight, in dollars that came into Florida than the freight that flowed within Orlando? The parenthesis after the number means to that tenth power. Problem to solve: The value of the freight, in dollars, that came into Florida is ____________. Answer choices are 0.5, 2, 20, 50, 200 ___________________ times larger than the freight that flowed within Orlando.
Which would not be a step in solving 18=2(4+x)
Determine whether the below given statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning : Although I can solve 3x + 1/5 = 1/4 by first subtracting 1/5 from both sides, I find it easier to begin by multiplying both sides by 20, the least common denominator.
How to Solve the equation of 2x-(7/6)+(x/6)=((4x+9)/6) when x=
solve using the zero factor property 45-t2=0