Marley goes outside the duties of her agency in negotiating a business contract between her principal and a customer. Which of the following is true? A. Even if the principal ratifies the contract Marley made, it does not have to pay her for the work. B. If the principal disavows the contract Marley made, it still must pay for the work. C. If the principal ratifies the contract Marley made, it must pay her for the work. D. The principal is required to ratify the contract Marley made, and also to pay her for her work.

Marley goes outside the duties of her agency in negotiating a business contract between her principal and a customer. Which of the following is true? A. Even if the principal ratifies the contract Marley made, it does not have to pay her for the work. B. If the principal disavows the contract Marley made, it still must pay for the work. C. If the principal ratifies the contract Marley made, it must pay her for the work. D. The principal is required to ratify the contract Marley made, and also to pay her for her work.

Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305224414

Author:JENNINGS

Publisher:JENNINGS

Chapter4: Managing Disputes: Alternative Dispute Resolution And Litigation Strategies

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Amy is a salesperson for ABC Company. Although ABC never expressly authorized her to collect payments (cash and checks) from the customers, she routinely does so for some of her long standing customers and submits them to ABC, who accepted payment without issue. One day, Amy collects cash from one of her customers and runs off. The customer sues ABC Company. If ABC is liable, it is because Amy has a. apparent authority b. implied authority c. no authority d. express authority
Alice owns a contracting company that receives most of its business through government contracts. A new procurement officer with a government agency implies to Alice that if she does not send him a bribe for her latest awarded contract, she will not get any further contracts. If Alice loses future contracts, her business will fail. She reluctantly gives the officer a bribe. Has Alice committed a violation? A. Yes, because Alice was not under economic duress. B. Yes, because being extorted is not a defense to giving a bribe. C. No, because Alice was under economic duress. D. No, because Alice was not the one who proposed the bribe.
Government contracts account for the majority of Alice's business, which she owns as a contracting firm. A new procurement official with a government organisation makes an implied threat to Alice that she won't receive any further contracts if she doesn't offer him a bribe for her most recent deal. Alice's company will shut down if she loses further customers. She bribes the police reluctanly. Has Alice broken any rules? A. Alice was not under financial pressure, thus the answer is yes. B. Insofar as being the victim of extortion does not excuse paying a bribe. C. No, since Alice was struggling financially. D. No, because the bribe wasn't suggested by Alice.
Judy Bell, CPA is an independent auditor for a company called Best Products Incorporated. The management of Best Products has asked Judy if she could provide assistance with payroll processing. Judy has accepted this payroll process job and also wants to remain the auditor. Can Judy bell, CPA remain the auditor of Best Products incorporated and perform this nonattest service? If so is there anything that Judy Bell, CPA must consider when accepting and performing his service? Does it matter if Judy Bell, CPA wants to perform this nonattest service of payroll processing while serving as the auditor for a public company or private company?
Most employees that choose to commit fraud against their employers feel justified in doing so. For example, if an employee gets demoted and has to take a pay cut or doesn't get a raise or bonus for a given year, that employee may feel justified in taking what is referred to "wages in kind." Wages in kind is where the employee creates his or her own wages. What might a company do to prevent an employee from taking "wages in kind?"
Firenze is the holder of an instrument payable to him (Firenze) or his order, with Florence as maker. Firenze then indorsed it as follows: "Subject to no recourse, pay to Florencia. Signed, Firenze." When Florencia went to collect from Florence, it turned out that Florence's signature was forged. Florencia now sues Firenze for collection. Will it prosper? a. No, because Firenze made a qualified indorsement. b. No, because a qualified indorsement does not include the warranty of genuineness. c. Yes, because Firenze, as a conditional indorser, warrants that the note is genuine. d. Yes, because Firenze, as a qualified indorser, warrants that the note is genuine.
Jiggy, owner of Jaguar Security Agency offers security services unto Honest Industries Co. of which his father Joe Calida sits as member of the Board of Directors. What are the requirements for the contract to be declared valid by the Board?
In some occupations and in some industries, the running of a business may involve sensitive information. It could be something as simple as a recipe or as complex as a medical file but, regardless, the employee must sign an employment contract with very specific requirements that the employee not take certain actions. In short, these are called restrictive covenants, which are terms in an employment contract that outline conditions, promises, and restrictions of the employee with regard to the business. What are 2 examples of restrictive covenants? List and explain why you chose them.
Roland, a basketball star, was under contract for one year to play-for-play exclusively for Lady Love, Inc. However, even before the basketball season could open, he was offered a more attractive pay plus fringes benefits by Sweet Taste, Inc. Roland accepted the offer and transferred to Sweet Taste. Lady Love sues Roland and Sweet Taste for breach of contract. Defendants claim that the restriction to pay for Lady Love alone is void, hence, unenforceable ,as it constitutes an undue interference with the right of Roland to enter into contracts and the impairment of his freedom to pay and enjoy basketball. Can Roland be bound by the contract he entered into with Lady Love or can he disregard the same? Is he liable at all? Reasons.
Why do people commit fruad in there jobs? what should a manager do if some of its workers committed fraud and been fired and charged criminally.
Suppose that bank A buys a car for client B, and resells the car to the client. The bank and the client are both aware of the sales price to the client and mutually agree, but the cost of the car to the client is not disclosed to the client and is known only to the bank and the car dealer. Does this transaction meet the requirements of a valid Murabaha contract? Explain your answer.
In one of the following situations, the member acted properly. Which one? Group of answer choices a. Joe was providing consulting services to client Lowery Company and in that capacity learned trade secrets that he used to convince Richter Corporation to hire him as a consultant who could help Richter compete against Lowery. b. Fiona prepared a joint tax return for Tom and Pam, a married couple. When Tom and Pam got into a vicious divorce proceeding, Fiona helped Pam, whom she perceived to be the wronged party, and refused to share any information with Tom, whom she thought was a bad husband. c. Han prepared corporate income tax returns for Nadle Corporation until he became uncomfortable with how aggressive in seeking deductions Nadle was asking him to be. He“fired” Nadle as a client. When Nadle sought to replace Han with Jennifer, she called Han and asked: “What can you tell me about Nadle?” Han replied: “Well, I think you should ask Nadle to grant me permission to speak…