× red 22:44 Get live help whenever you need from online tutors! Work in process, October 1ª Started during October 2017 Assemory. Get up a account for work in Process Assembly and post your entries to it. 17-38 FIFO method (continuation of 17-36). 1. Do Problem 17-36 using the FIFO method of process costing. Explain any difference between the cost per equivalent unit in the assembly department under the weighted-average method and the FIFO method. 2. Should Larsen's managers choose the weighted-average method or the FIFO method? Explain briefly. 17-39 Transferred-in costs, weighted-average method (related to 17-36-17-38). Larsen Company, as you know, is a manufacturer of car seats. Each car seat passes through the assembly department and testing department. This problem focuses on the testing department. Direct materials are added when the testing department process is 90% complete. Conversion costs are added evenly during the testing department's process. As work in assembly is completed, each unit is immediately transferred to testing. As each unit is completed in testing, it is immediately transferred to Finished Goods. Larsen Company uses the weighted-average method of process costing. Data for the testing depart- ment for October 2017 are as follows: Completed during October 2017 Work in process, October 31 Total costs added during October 2017 Physical Units (Car Seats) 7,500 ? AA 26,300 3,700 Try bartleby tutor today Transferred- In Costs $2,932,500 $7,717,500 $9,704,700 "Degree of completion: transferred-in costs,?%; direct materials, ?%; conversion costs, 70%. Degree of completion: transferred-in costs,?%; direct materials, ?%; conversion costs, 60%. 1. What is the percentage of completion for (a) transferred-in costs and direct materials in beginning work-in-process inventory and (b) transferred-in costs and direct materials in ending work-in-process inventory? 2. For each cost category, compute equivalent units in the testing department. Show physical units in the first column of your schedule. 3. For each cost category, summarize total testing department costs for October 2017, calculate the cost per equivalent unit, and assign costs to units completed (and transferred out) and to units in ending work in process. 4. Prepare journal entries for October transfers from the assembly department to the testing department and from the testing department to Finished Goods. HUAWEI 17-40 Transferred-in costs, FIFO method (continuation of 17-39). Refer to the information in Problem 17-39. Suppose that Larsen Company uses the FIFO method instead of the weighted-average method in all of its depart- mante The only channes to Prohlam 17.29 under the FIFO mathod are that total tranefarrad.in enete of haninninn mante The only channes to Prohlam 17.29 indar the FIFO mothnd are that total tranefarrad.in enete of haninninn stead of the weighted average method in all of its depart- Direct Materials $ bartleby.com LTE Conversion Costs 0 $ 835,460 ASSIGNMENT MATERIAL $3,955,900 Required 17 Ć JL 735

Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)
8th Edition
ISBN:9781305961883
Author:Carl Warren
Publisher:Carl Warren
Chapter10: Accounting Systems For Manufacturing Operations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 10.4MBA
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Topic Video
Question
×
red
22:44
Get live help whenever you
need from online tutors!
Work in process, October 1ª
Started during October 2017
Assemory. Get up a account for work in Process Assembly and post your entries to it.
17-38 FIFO method (continuation of 17-36).
1. Do Problem 17-36 using the FIFO method of process costing. Explain any difference between the cost per
equivalent unit in the assembly department under the weighted-average method and the FIFO method.
2. Should Larsen's managers choose the weighted-average method or the FIFO method? Explain briefly.
17-39 Transferred-in costs, weighted-average method (related to 17-36-17-38). Larsen Company, as you
know, is a manufacturer of car seats. Each car seat passes through the assembly department and testing
department. This problem focuses on the testing department. Direct materials are added when the testing
department process is 90% complete. Conversion costs are added evenly during the testing department's
process. As work in assembly is completed, each unit is immediately transferred to testing. As each unit is
completed in testing, it is immediately transferred to Finished Goods.
Larsen Company uses the weighted-average method of process costing. Data for the testing depart-
ment for October 2017 are as follows:
Completed during October 2017
Work in process, October 31
Total costs added during October 2017
Physical Units
(Car Seats)
7,500
?
AA
26,300
3,700
Try bartleby
tutor today
Transferred-
In Costs
$2,932,500
$7,717,500 $9,704,700
"Degree of completion: transferred-in costs,?%; direct materials, ?%; conversion costs, 70%.
Degree of completion: transferred-in costs,?%; direct materials, ?%; conversion costs, 60%.
1. What is the percentage of completion for (a) transferred-in costs and direct materials in beginning
work-in-process inventory and (b) transferred-in costs and direct materials in ending work-in-process
inventory?
2. For each cost category, compute equivalent units in the testing department. Show physical units in the
first column of your schedule.
3. For each cost category, summarize total testing department costs for October 2017, calculate the cost
per equivalent unit, and assign costs to units completed (and transferred out) and to units in ending
work in process.
4. Prepare journal entries for October transfers from the assembly department to the testing department
and from the testing department to Finished Goods.
HUAWEI
17-40 Transferred-in costs, FIFO method (continuation of 17-39). Refer to the information in Problem 17-39.
Suppose that Larsen Company uses the FIFO method instead of the weighted-average method in all of its depart-
mante The only channes to Prohlam 17.29 under the FIFO mathod are that total tranefarrad.in enete of haninninn
mante The only channes to Prohlam 17.29 indar the FIFO mothnd are that total tranefarrad.in enete of haninninn
stead of the weighted average method in all of its depart-
Direct
Materials
$
bartleby.com
LTE
Conversion
Costs
0 $ 835,460
ASSIGNMENT MATERIAL
$3,955,900
Required
17
Ć
JL
735
Transcribed Image Text:× red 22:44 Get live help whenever you need from online tutors! Work in process, October 1ª Started during October 2017 Assemory. Get up a account for work in Process Assembly and post your entries to it. 17-38 FIFO method (continuation of 17-36). 1. Do Problem 17-36 using the FIFO method of process costing. Explain any difference between the cost per equivalent unit in the assembly department under the weighted-average method and the FIFO method. 2. Should Larsen's managers choose the weighted-average method or the FIFO method? Explain briefly. 17-39 Transferred-in costs, weighted-average method (related to 17-36-17-38). Larsen Company, as you know, is a manufacturer of car seats. Each car seat passes through the assembly department and testing department. This problem focuses on the testing department. Direct materials are added when the testing department process is 90% complete. Conversion costs are added evenly during the testing department's process. As work in assembly is completed, each unit is immediately transferred to testing. As each unit is completed in testing, it is immediately transferred to Finished Goods. Larsen Company uses the weighted-average method of process costing. Data for the testing depart- ment for October 2017 are as follows: Completed during October 2017 Work in process, October 31 Total costs added during October 2017 Physical Units (Car Seats) 7,500 ? AA 26,300 3,700 Try bartleby tutor today Transferred- In Costs $2,932,500 $7,717,500 $9,704,700 "Degree of completion: transferred-in costs,?%; direct materials, ?%; conversion costs, 70%. Degree of completion: transferred-in costs,?%; direct materials, ?%; conversion costs, 60%. 1. What is the percentage of completion for (a) transferred-in costs and direct materials in beginning work-in-process inventory and (b) transferred-in costs and direct materials in ending work-in-process inventory? 2. For each cost category, compute equivalent units in the testing department. Show physical units in the first column of your schedule. 3. For each cost category, summarize total testing department costs for October 2017, calculate the cost per equivalent unit, and assign costs to units completed (and transferred out) and to units in ending work in process. 4. Prepare journal entries for October transfers from the assembly department to the testing department and from the testing department to Finished Goods. HUAWEI 17-40 Transferred-in costs, FIFO method (continuation of 17-39). Refer to the information in Problem 17-39. Suppose that Larsen Company uses the FIFO method instead of the weighted-average method in all of its depart- mante The only channes to Prohlam 17.29 under the FIFO mathod are that total tranefarrad.in enete of haninninn mante The only channes to Prohlam 17.29 indar the FIFO mothnd are that total tranefarrad.in enete of haninninn stead of the weighted average method in all of its depart- Direct Materials $ bartleby.com LTE Conversion Costs 0 $ 835,460 ASSIGNMENT MATERIAL $3,955,900 Required 17 Ć JL 735
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Costing Systems
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)
Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305961883
Author:
Carl Warren
Publisher:
Cengage Learning