owing in styles after controlled hand-pollinations in which the two species served as pollen donor (A is blue, B is red) or pollen recipient (A on the left, B on the right). The number of pollen tubes growing in styles of species A was significantly greater than the number growing in styles of species B. However, there was no significant difference in the number of pollen tubes observed in either species based on the identity of the pollen donor. Similarly, there was no significant difference between species in the effect of pollen donor identity on the number of pollen tubes observed (i.e., no significant pollen recipient x pollen donor interaction). Do these data support the hypothesis that the two species maintain their boundaries via a difference in pollen tube growth? Why or why not? 35 30 10 Species A (pollen door Species (pollen donor Species (pollen recipient) 8

Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)
4th Edition
ISBN:9781305389892
Author:Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillan
Publisher:Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillan
Chapter22: Speciation
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1ITD: David Hills of Baylor University noted that three closely related species of leopard frog (genus...
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question
The accompanying figure shows hypothetical data for an experimental test of reproductive isolation between species A and B. The data show the number of pollen tubes observed growing in
styles after controlled hand-pollinations in which the two species served as pollen donor (A is blue, B is red) or pollen recipient (A on the left, B on the right). The number of pollen tubes
growing in styles of species A was significantly greater than the number growing in styles of species B. However, there was no significant difference in the number of pollen tubes observed in
either species based on the identity of the pollen donor. Similarly, there was no significant difference between species in the effect of pollen donor identity on the number of pollen tubes
observed (i.e., no significant pollen recipient x pollen donor interaction). Do these data support the hypothesis that the two species maintain their boundaries via a difference in pollen tube
growth? Why or why not?
Pollen tubes
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
A
Species A (pollen donor)
Species B (pollen donor)
Species (pollen recipient)
B
Transcribed Image Text:The accompanying figure shows hypothetical data for an experimental test of reproductive isolation between species A and B. The data show the number of pollen tubes observed growing in styles after controlled hand-pollinations in which the two species served as pollen donor (A is blue, B is red) or pollen recipient (A on the left, B on the right). The number of pollen tubes growing in styles of species A was significantly greater than the number growing in styles of species B. However, there was no significant difference in the number of pollen tubes observed in either species based on the identity of the pollen donor. Similarly, there was no significant difference between species in the effect of pollen donor identity on the number of pollen tubes observed (i.e., no significant pollen recipient x pollen donor interaction). Do these data support the hypothesis that the two species maintain their boundaries via a difference in pollen tube growth? Why or why not? Pollen tubes 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 A Species A (pollen donor) Species B (pollen donor) Species (pollen recipient) B
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Evolutionary genetics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)
Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)
Biology
ISBN:
9781305389892
Author:
Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillan
Publisher:
Cengage Learning