P is in dire need of cash. He then approaches M and requests that M issue a negotiable bill of exhange in P's favor at P50,000 so that P can sell the instrument to A. So M issued a negotiable BOE to P, then P endorsed it to A. Upon due date of the said BOE, who are the primarily liable party/parties to the instrument who should pay A? a. M and P b. M or P c. M d. P

P is in dire need of cash. He then approaches M and requests that M issue a negotiable bill of exhange in P's favor at P50,000 so that P can sell the instrument to A. So M issued a negotiable BOE to P, then P endorsed it to A. Upon due date of the said BOE, who are the primarily liable party/parties to the instrument who should pay A? a. M and P b. M or P c. M d. P

SWFT Corp Partner Estates Trusts

42nd Edition

ISBN:9780357161548

Author:Raabe

Publisher:Raabe

Chapter17: Tax Practice And Ethics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 11DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

M issues a negotiable BOE payable to P or order for P10,000. P endorsed the instrument to A, then A to B, then B to C, then C to D. D presents the instrument to the drawee, but the drawee dishonored the instrument. Assuming that D approached C and invoked his warranty as an indorser, from whom can C seek recovery of amount paid to D? a. B, then A, then P, then M. b. M, P, A, B without any particular order c. M d. B
Westminster executed a promissory note with a face value of Php800,000.00, payable to the order of Bath. Bath indorsed the note to Whiltshire, to whom Bath owed Php500,000.00. If Westminster has no defense at all against Bath, for how much may Whiltshire collect from Westminster? a. None, as Whiltshire's remedy is to run after his debtor, Bath. b. Php300,000.00, as he is a holder for value to the extent of the difference between Bath's debt and the value of the note. c. Php500,000.00, as he is a holder for value to the extent of his lien. d. Php800,000.00, but with the obligation to hold Php500,000.00 for Bath's benefit.
S (debtor) is indebted to T (creditor) in the amount of PhP50,000.00. S proposed to T that Y will be the one to pay the debt, making him (Y) as the new debtor. T agreed to the proposal. It turned out, however, that Y is insolvent so T was not able to collect the amount due from Y. Question: Can T enforce the obligation to S, given the insolvency of Y? Explain
-G, guardian of M, sold the latter’s parcel of land worth P100,000 for only P90,000. Is the contract rescissible? Explain. -X orally sold his lot to Y for P500,000 and the latter gave an earnest money in the amount of P50,000 which the former acknowledged in a receipt. Later on, X refused to comply with the contract. Can Y enforce the contract against X? Explain.
A (debtor) is indebted to B (creditor) PhP300,000.00. X, a third party, offered to give B the PhP300,000.00, to which B agreed. B, however failed to disclose that there was a prior partial payment made by A in the amount of PhP100,000.00. X paid B the entire amount of PhP300,000.00 Questions: 1.] What is the effect of the payment made by X in so far as the obligation of A to B is concerned? 2.] Can X proceed against A and demand payment from the latter? If yes, how much can X collect from A? Explain your answer.
A (debtor) is indebted to B (creditor) PhP300,000.00. X, a third party, offered to give B the PhP300,000.00, to which B agreed. B, however failed to disclose that there was a prior partial payment made by A in the amount of PhP100,000.00. X paid B the entire amount of PhP300,000.00 Questions: 1.] What is the effect of the payment made by X in so far as the obligation of A to B is concerned? 2.] Can X proceed against A and demand payment from the latter? If yes, how much can X collect from A? Explain
T borrows $100,000 from the bank in Year 1, which he agrees to repay in Year 2. Whenthe debt becomes due in Year 2, the bank agrees to release T from liability if hepays $80,000.a. T realizes $100,000 of income in Year 1.b. T realizes $20,000 of income from the cancellation of debt in Year 2.c. T realizes $20,000 of ordinary income as compensation for services in Year 2 ifthe cancellation of debt was intended to satisfy the bank’s obligation to pay Tfor services.d. Both a and b.e. Either b or c, depending on the circumstances. T buys a parcel of real estate for $100,000, which he finances by giving the seller a nonrecoursemortgage for the full purchase price. The debt is due in one balloon payment inYear 5. When the debt becomes due in Year 5, T decides to give the property back to theseller in satisfaction of the debt (the property is worth only $50,000 at that time).a. T will realize $100,000 of income in Year 1 because the debt was non-recourse.b. T will realize no income in Year…
D is indebted to C for P10,000 due on March 31, 2022. To secure the fulfillment thereof, D endorsed a negotiable promissory note executed by P for P15,000 due on January 31, 2022. In this case,a. The pledge is void since the promissory note would be due earlier than the obligation it secures.b. D will collect the P15,000 on January 31, 2022 and pay C with the proceeds of the collectionc. C may collect the proceeds of the note and apply the P15,000 for the payment of D’s obligationd. C may collect the proceeds of the note and applyP10,000 for the payment of D’s obligation and return the excess P5,000 to D.
Keith Coalburner has written a letter of complaint regarding his recent purchase of municipal bonds to his broker-dealer. Upon receipt of the complaint, the broker-dealer must first guarantee to make the customer whole accept the complaint and write down any action taken return any markup or commission charged immediately repurchase the securities at a price at or slightly above Keith’s purchase price
Holly Hill Acres, Ltd., executed and delivered a promissory note and a purchase money mortgage to Rogers and Blythe. The note provided that it was secured by a mortgage on certain real estate and that the terms of that mortgage “are by this reference made a part hereof.” Rogers and Blythe then assigned the note to Charter Bank, and the bank sought to foreclose on the note and mortgage. Holly Hill Acres refused to pay, claiming that the note was not negotiable and therefore subject to the defense that Holly Hill Acres had been defrauded by Rogers and Blythe. a. Present the position that the note is a negotiable instrument. b. What is the position that the note is nonnegotiable? c. Is the note negotiable or nonnegotiable? Explain.
Mr..Park loaned P24,000,000 to Jay & Won Company. The loan is secured by land situated in North Carolina, U.S.A. with a book value and fair value of P30,000,000 and P18,000,000, respectively. Due to the current financial conditions, Jay & Won Company was forced to liquidate. What amount will the Mr. Park receive if unsecured creditors receive 30% of their claims?
Ayen, Tristan and joey are solidary debtors under a loan obligation of P900,000.00 which has fallen due. However, Adolf, the creditor, condoned Ayen’s entire share in the debt. Since Tristan has become insolvent, Adolf makes a demand on Joey to pay the debt. 4.a) How much, if any, may Joey be compelled to pay? 4.b) To what extent, if at all, can Ayen be compelled by Joey to contribute to such payment?