Past records suggest that the mean annual income,  μ1 , of teachers in state of pennsylvania is less than or equal to the mean annual income,  μ2 , of teachers in Illinois. In a current study, a random sample of  15  teachers from pennsylvania and an independent random sample of  15  teachers from Illinois have been asked to report their mean annual income. The data obtained are as follows:   Annual income in dollars pennsylvania 49204, 44644, 56205, 45100, 40385, 50560, 47642, 46225, 41540, 49653, 47472, 45562, 57841, 45448, 45279 Illinois 41795, 41712, 40832, 39785, 46177, 50496, 36066, 38146, 40326, 50170, 38444, 49513, 46034, 50010, 37844 The population standard deviation for mean annual income of teachers in pennsylvania and in Illinois are estimated as  6400  and  6100 , respectively. It is also known that both populations are approximately normally distributed. At the  0.1  level of significance, is there sufficient evidence to reject the claim that the mean annual income of teachers in state of pennsylvania is less than or equal to the mean annual income of teachers in Illinois? Perform a one-tailed test.    The null hypothesis: H0:   The alternative hypothesis: H1:   The type of test statistic: (Choose one)ZtChi squareF             The value of the test statistic:(Round to at least three decimal places.)   The critical value at the  0.1  level of significance:(Round to at least three decimal places.)   Can we reject the claim that the mean annual income of teachers from pennsylvania is less than or equal to the mean annual income of teachers from Illinois?   Yes     No

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.5: Comparing Sets Of Data
Problem 14PPS
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

Past records suggest that the mean annual income, 

μ1

, of teachers in state of pennsylvania is less than or equal to the mean annual income, 

μ2

, of teachers in Illinois. In a current study, a random sample of 

15

 teachers from pennsylvania and an independent random sample of 

15

 teachers from Illinois have been asked to report their mean annual income. The data obtained are as follows:

  Annual income in dollars
pennsylvania
49204, 44644, 56205, 45100, 40385, 50560, 47642, 46225, 41540, 49653, 47472, 45562, 57841, 45448, 45279
Illinois
41795, 41712, 40832, 39785, 46177, 50496, 36066, 38146, 40326, 50170, 38444, 49513, 46034, 50010, 37844

The population standard deviation for mean annual income of teachers in pennsylvania and in Illinois are estimated as 

6400

 and 

6100

, respectively. It is also known that both populations are approximately normally distributed. At the 

0.1

 level of significance, is there sufficient evidence to reject the claim that the mean annual income of teachers in state of pennsylvania is less than or equal to the mean annual income of teachers in Illinois? Perform a one-tailed test. 

 
The null hypothesis:
H0:
 
The alternative hypothesis:
H1:
 
The type of test statistic: (Choose one)ZtChi squareF      
     
The value of the test statistic:
(Round to at least three decimal places.)
 
The critical value at the 
0.1
 level of significance:
(Round to at least three decimal places.)
 
Can we reject the claim that the mean annual income of teachers from pennsylvania is less than or equal to the mean annual income of teachers from Illinois?
 
Yes
 
 
No
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill