Use Pareto analysis (chart) to investigate the quality losses at Basawas Paper Con-verters. What conclusions might a Six Sigma team leader reach?Image with data attached Problem 3-5Basawas Paper ConvertersCategoryDowntimeTesting costsRejected paperOdd lotExcess inspection1 Customer complaints2 High material costs3 Quality improvement training$Annual LossChart Title350,00023,00012,000300,00056,00016,00084,00032,0007,000300,000100%90%250,00080%200,00070%60%150,00050%5 Total100,000530,00040%Use Pareto analysis (chart) to investigate thequality losses at Basawas Paper Con-verters.What conclusions might a Six Sigma team50,00030%20%leader reach?10%0%Odd lotRejected paperDowntimeCustomer complaintsTesting costsHigh material costsExcess inspectionQuality improvement.

Six Sigma is a business system that expects to further develop measures, diminish waste and…

Problem 3-5 Basawas Paper Converters Category $Annual Loss Chart Title Downtime 350,000 Testing costs Rejected paper Odd lot Excess inspection Customer complaints High material costs Quality improvement training 23,000 12,000 300,000 56,000 16,000 84,000 32,000 7,000 300,000 100% 90% 250,000 80% 200,000 70% 150,000 60% Total 50% 100,000 530,000 40% Use Pareto analysis (chart) to investigate the quality losses at Basawas Paper Con-verters. What conclusions might a Six Sigma team leader reach? 50,000 30% 20% 10% Odd lot 0% Rejected paper Downtime Customer complaints High material costs Testing costs Excess inspection Quality improvement.

Problem 3-5 Basawas Paper Converters Category $Annual Loss Chart Title Downtime 350,000 Testing costs Rejected paper Odd lot Excess inspection Customer complaints High material costs Quality improvement training 23,000 12,000 300,000 56,000 16,000 84,000 32,000 7,000 300,000 100% 90% 250,000 80% 200,000 70% 150,000 60% Total 50% 100,000 530,000 40% Use Pareto analysis (chart) to investigate the quality losses at Basawas Paper Con-verters. What conclusions might a Six Sigma team leader reach? 50,000 30% 20% 10% Odd lot 0% Rejected paper Downtime Customer complaints High material costs Testing costs Excess inspection Quality improvement.

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

ChapterC: Cases

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5.3SD: Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
Mont Corp produces and sells 1,000 dining tables per year. Currently its only quality problem with the products is related to varnishing. It currently incurs $400 per year for quality training and $600 per year for reliability engineering. Inspection cost is $6 per unit, and all units produced are inspected. Traditionally, at an internal inspection, 9% of all units fully-produced are found to have problems with the varnishing, and are reworked. Rework cost is $100 per unit. Defective units sold to customers are returned to the company and reworked. External failures are 1% of units sold, and the company incurs the shipping costs at the rate of $20 per unit. In 2020, management are considering an alternative method of inspecting products which will reduce inspection cost by $1.50 per unit. The alternative method will reduce the internal failure to 4% of all units produced, and increase the external failure rate to 6% of all units sold. In addition, with the alternative inspection…
An item can be sold for P63per unit wholesale is being produced with thefollowing cost data: Labor cost =P10 per unitMaterial cost =P15 per unitFixed charges =P10,000Other variable cost =P8 per unit a.) What is the break-even sales volume?b.) What is the break-even sales volume if one out of every ten units produced is defective and is rejected with only full recovery on materials?
One of the firm’s audit partners, Alice Goodwin, justhad lunch with a good friend, Sara Hitchcock, who is president of Granger ContainerCorporation. Granger Container Corp. is a fast-growing company that has been in businessfor only a few years. During lunch, Sara asked Alice for some advice and direction on howGranger Container should structure its systems development process within the InformationSystems Department. Sara noted that because Granger has experienced such tremendousgrowth, the systems development process has evolved into its current state without muchdirection. Given Granger Container’s current size, Sara questions whether their currentprocesses are reasonable. Sara’s concern is magnified by the fact that she has little understanding of information systems processes. Alice told Sara about your information systemsevaluation experience and agreed to have you look at Granger Container’s current systemsdevelopment procedures. Sara gave Alice the following summary of the…
Your company has asked you to determine the financial risks of manufacturing 6,000 units of a product rather than purchasing them from a vendor at $66.50 per unit. The production line will handle exactly 6,000 units and requires a one-time setup cost of $50,000. The production cost is $60/unit. Your manufacturing personnel inform you that some of the units may be defective, as shown below: % defective 0 1 2 3 4 probability of 40 30 20 6 4 occurrence (%) Defective items must be removed and replaced at a cost of $145/defective unit. However, 100 percent of units purchased from vendors are defect-free. Construct a payoff table, and using the expected-value model, determine the financial risk and whether the make or buy option is best.
Problem 1Human visual inspection is necessary in many quality engineering contexts and is naturallysubject to subjectivity. This is especially true for the inspection of solder joints on circuit boards,as there are numerous types of solder defects, as well as a degree to which a joint possessesone or more defect. Consequently, even highly trained inspectors can disagree on the status ofa particular joint. In a batch of 10,000 such joints, inspector A found 724 to be defective,inspect B found 751 to be defective, and 1159 of the joints were judged to be defective by atleast one of the inspectors. Suppose that one of the 10,000 joints is randomly selected.a. What is the probability that the selected joint was judged to be defective by neither ofthe two inspectors?b. What is the probability that the selected joint was judged to be defective by inspector Bbut not by inspector A?
Rubatex Corporation manufactures rubber and foam for a variety of products, including artificial turf housing and insulation, hockey helmet liners, scuba diving suits, sports sandals and mouse pads. The company was purchased by an investment firm called American industrial partners (AIP) that has so far earned only a 1 percent return on its investment. Obviously the company is having problems. Its sales are up but earnings are down. In the first three months after acquisition, the company lost $2 million on $68 million in sales. Understandably, AIP wants to know why and is demanding aggressive action. Employees at the Bedford, Virginia, plant say they know something’s wrong. The plant is hot and dirty and crumbling, and they are working harder to produce items of poorer quality. Fewer than 7 of 10 orders are shipped on time, and 2% of sales are returned as defective. Built in 1924, the plant sprawls over 14 buildings, with only the offices and lunchroom air-conditioned. Equipment is…
Q: Model the following business process at a supplier. . After a supplier notifies a retailer of the approval of a purchase order, the supplier can receive an order confirmation, an order change, or an order cancelation from the retailer. It may happen that no response is received at all. If no response is received after 48 h, or if an order cancelation is received, the supplier will cancel the order. If an order confirmation is received within 48 h, the supplier will process the order normally. If an order change is received within 48 h, the supplier will update the order and ask again the retailer for confirmation. The retailer is allowed to change an order at most three times. Afterwards, the supplier will automatically cancel the order.
Which business product classification is most appropriate for a computer chip used inside a pickup truck? a. Raw materialb. Major equipmentc. Process materiald. Component parte. Accessory equipment
31. among the following variances. which of them does not need a corrective action? a. 200,000 b. 50,000 c. -750,000 d. 0