Problem: A) Assume that real GDP of a hypothetical economy in Year 1 is $2000 and rate of unemployment is increasing every year. Policy makers believe that if the real GDP is $3000 in Year 2 full employment would be accomplished. If mpc is 0.75: By how much should government expenditure increase if full employment is going to be achieved by Year 2? B) If the government decides to lower taxes to achieve full employment by Year 2, by how much should government taxes be reduced?

Problem: A) Assume that real GDP of a hypothetical economy in Year 1 is $2000 and rate of unemployment is increasing every year. Policy makers believe that if the real GDP is $3000 in Year 2 full employment would be accomplished. If mpc is 0.75: By how much should government expenditure increase if full employment is going to be achieved by Year 2? B) If the government decides to lower taxes to achieve full employment by Year 2, by how much should government taxes be reduced?

ECON MACRO

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337000529

Author:William A. McEachern

Publisher:William A. McEachern

Chapter11: Fiscal Policy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.4P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that the investment demand curve in a certain economy is such that investment declines by $110 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate. Also, suppose that the investment demand curve shifts rightward by $170 billion at each real interest rate for every 1 percentage point increase in the expected rate of return from investment. If stimulus spending (an expansionary fiscal policy) by government increases the real interest rate by 2 percentage points, but also raises the expected rate of return on investment by 1 percentage point, how much investment, if any, will be crowded out? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
2. Suppose the economy is in recession. Policymakers estimate that aggregate demand is$100 billion short of the amount necessary to generate the long run natural rate of output.That is, if aggregate demand were shifted to the right by $100 billion, the economy would be inlong run equilibrium.a. Explain the impact on the economy if the government chooses to use fiscal policy to stabilizethe economy and the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is given as 0.75 with no crowdingout.b. If there is a crowding out effect and investment is very sensitive to changes in the interest rate,should the government increase spending more or less than this amount?
(a) Assume that Gross Domestic Product (GDP)/Total output (Y) is 6,000. Consumption (C) is given by the equation C = 600 + 0.6(Y – T) where T is the tax. Investment (I) is given by the equation I = 2,000 – 100r, where r is the real rate of interest, in percent. Taxes (T) are 500, and government spending (G) is also 500. What are the equilibrium values of C, I, and r?
2) The short and medium run a) Suppose that the mark-up of goods prices over marginal costs is 10% and that the wage-setting equation is W = P(1 – u), where u is the unemployment rate. Calculate the real wage, asdetermined by the price-setting equation and the natural rate of unemployment. b) Consider a situation (A) where the government increases its spending G, while keeping thetaxes T unchanged leading to an expansionary fiscal policy. Show in diagram below, whathappens to output and prices in the (B) short run and (C) medium run? Don’t forget to label theaxis.(images)
ax policy is one used not only for economic purposes but also for political purposes. It is the opinion of some economists and politicians that the rich should pay more of their income in taxes, and that the resulting fairness from this rise in taxes will lead to more economic growth and a rise in employment. Using the simple expenditure model (Y and Ep, not IS-LM) answer these two questions: One, would a lump-sum tax increase on many high-income households cause GDP to rise in the short run as predicted by the politicians? Why or why not? And two, are there macroeconomic conditions in the simple model under which such a tax increase would be fully warranted? Draw the graphs and explain the outcomes for both cases.
2. In macroeconomic theory, total or aggregate spending is denoted by A and total or aggregateproduction of income by Y. Which one of the following statements is incorrect? A When A is greater than Y, there is disequilibrium and Y will tend to increase.B When A is equal to Y, there is equilibrium and Y will remain unchanged.C When A is less than Y, there is disequilibrium and Y will decrease.D When A is greater than Y, there is disequilibrium and A will decrease.
Scenario 2Suppose the marginal product of capital is MPK=2-0.001K, the capital stock depreciates at 20% rate, the tax rate on revenues is 20% and price of capital is assumned to be 1. Furthermore, the economy has full-employment level of output of 5000, government purchases are 1000. Desired consumption is given by C^d=3000-2000r+0.1Y, where Y is output and r is expected real interest rate. Initial level of capital is 1000.Refer to Scenario 2. what is the expression for desired gross investment ? A) I^d=950-1250r B)I^d=950+1250r C)I^d=1750-1250r D)I^d=1950-1250r.
5 3. permanent Income Hypothesis a) suppose that beta=.9 and R= 2222 (that is ~22%). For an individual who acts according to the PIH, will their consumption next period be higher than current consumption or lower? b) What is the main crucial difference between the Keynesian Consumption function and the consumption function derived from the PIH (or Lifetime Income Hypothesis)? c) If Present Value of future income stream is 500,000 and a person has a beta of.8, how much will their consumption go up today if only today's income increases by 1000? How much will their consumption increase (approximately) if their income goes up by 1000 in all periods?
A. Assume that a hypothetical economy with an MPC of .75 is experiencing severe recession. By how much would government spending have to rise to shift the aggregate demand curve rightward by $70 billion? B. How large a tax cut would be needed to achieve the same increase in aggregate demand?
a) Suppose that there are no crowding-out effects and the MPC is 0.8. By how much must the government increase expenditures shift the aggregate-demand curve right $10 billion? b. The model of Long-run Growth, proposes that fiscal policy can have lasting effects on savings, investment, and economic growth. On the other hand, the model of Aggregate Demand-Aggregate Supply suggests that the only long run effect of fiscal policy is an increase in the price level. How could you use the Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply model for a more accurate description of the short-run and long-run effects of an increase in government spending? Could you distinguish between different uses of government expenditures to predict their effects on prices and output?
Hi this question is for macroeconomics but on bartleby does not show any option for macroeconomics As a result of COVID-19, the Government of Canada has been actively using a discretionary fiscal stimulus policy. Using the Aggregate Supply – Aggregate Demand model, illustrate the intended impact of this policy on Aggregate Demand. Has the fiscal stimulus policy been effective? Why or why not? When the discretionary fiscal stimulus policy has ended, what actions with respect to the budget, will the government have to consider to address the debt level resulting from the discretionary fiscal stimulus policy?
(a) Suppose the price level in an economy rises while the money wage rate remains constant. What happens to the quantity of real GDP supplied. How will this affect the aggregate supply or aggregate demand curve? What if the potential GDP increases? Which aggregate curve is affected and how? (b) Real GDP Consumption Planned Investment Government Purchases Net Exports $1,000 $1,000 $100 $150 -$50 2,000 1,900 100 150 -50 3,000 2,800 100 150 -50 4,000 3,700 100 150 -50 From the table data provided, answer the following questions. The numbers in the table are in billions of dollars. Show all calculations. a. What is the equilibrium level of real GDP? b. What is the Marginal Propensity to Consume? c. What is the multiplier value in this economy? d. If potential GDP is $4,000 billion, is the economy at full employment? If not, what is the condition of the economy? e. If the economy is…