Question 3: Two roommates, Annabel and Brittany, are considering purchasing a coffee-table for their living room. Annabel has $200 of disposable income and Brittany has $150 of disposable income. Both roommates receive linear utility from personal consumption (i.e. one more dollar increases utility by one). Annabel would really like a coffee table, her utility would increase by 60 if she could use a coffee-table. Brittany likes the coffee-table less and having one would increase her utility only by 40. Given this information: 1. Calculate the reservation prices for each roommate 2. If the price of the coffee-table were $120, would it be Pareto efficient to buy it? Why / why not? 3. If the price pf the coffee-table were $80, would it be Pareto efficient to buy it? Why / why not? 4. Describe a possible division of the cost between the two roommates if they decide to buy the table.

Question 3: Two roommates, Annabel and Brittany, are considering purchasing a coffee-table for their living room. Annabel has $200 of disposable income and Brittany has $150 of disposable income. Both roommates receive linear utility from personal consumption (i.e. one more dollar increases utility by one). Annabel would really like a coffee table, her utility would increase by 60 if she could use a coffee-table. Brittany likes the coffee-table less and having one would increase her utility only by 40. Given this information: 1. Calculate the reservation prices for each roommate 2. If the price of the coffee-table were $120, would it be Pareto efficient to buy it? Why / why not? 3. If the price pf the coffee-table were $80, would it be Pareto efficient to buy it? Why / why not? 4. Describe a possible division of the cost between the two roommates if they decide to buy the table.

Economics:

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285859460

Author:BOYES, William

Publisher:BOYES, William

Chapter21: Demand: Consumer Choic

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You have the Cobb-Douglas utility function u(x,y) = xy over apples (x) and plums (y) and you have $120 budget to spend and can carry at most 480 ounces in weight in your backpack going back to the dorm. Each apple costs $1 and weighs 8 ounces, and each plum costs $3 and weighs 4 ounces. You can only leave the store with a bundle of fruits you can afford and carry. (a) Drawing the relevant lines, intercepts, marking the points and hence identifying the feasible set of bundles, calculate the optimal bundle. (b) Forget about (a). If you were to choose a backpack before going on this shopping trip, for the weight constraint not to be an issue for you, how many ounces of weight capacity would you need for your backpack? HINT: That is, for this weight capacity of the backpack, you’d be able to carry the best bundle you can afford, i.e, the weight constraint is not binding for your decision. ( c) Forget about (b). In (a), just before going out for shopping with your backpack to buy the…
Mats, who has reference-dependent preferences over beer and money, goes to the local pub with a friend, but is not planning on drinking any beer or spending any of his 50 Euro in cash. Let his end-of-evening outcomes in pints of beer consumed and cash be c1 and c2, respectively, and let his reference point in pints of beer and cash be r1 and r2, respectively. Then, Mats’ utility is given by v(6c1 − 6r1) + v(c2 − r2), where v(x) = x for x ≥ 0, and v(x) = 1.5x for x < 0. (a) Suppose that the price of beer is pB. Calculate Mats’ utility from drinking one pint of beer at this price. What is Mats’ utility from drinking no beer? And, comparing these two utility values, what is the maximum price pB that Mats would pay for one beer? (b) Suppose that Mats unexpectedly gets a pint of beer as part of a promotion at the pub, and incorporates its consumption into his reference point in beer. [Hint: this means that (r1, r2) = (1, 50).] Suppose that Mats could sell the beer at a price pS.…
Michael does not like to mix peanut butter and jelly in the same sandwich. However, he will consume them separately; for him, a sandwich with 1 spoon of peanut butter is exactly the same as a sandwich with 2 spoons of jelly. Michael has an income of m = 50, and the prices per spoonful of peanut butter and jelly are pPB=5 and pJ=11. Please write down Michael’s utility function over peanut butter (PB) and jelly (J). 2. Please determine Michael’s Marshallian demands PB*m and J*m3. Please determine Michael’s new Marshallian demands PB*m and J*m, when the price of peanut butter falls to pPB = 1.4. What are the (Hicks) SE and IE? Draw a diagram to show your analysis, with peanut butter on thehorizontal axis, and jelly on the vertical axis. 5. Recall that there are two different types of substitution effects. For example, in Q2 we have used theHicks SE. Does your answer to the last part change if we use the Slutsky SE? Justify. 6. Nam likes his peanut butter and jelly sandwiches with exactly…
Reese thinks peanut butter and chocolate are great when separate, but when they combine they are even more epic. In other words, Reese likes to eat either peanut butter or chocolate, but when he eats them together, he gets additional satisfaction from the combination. His preference over peanut butter (x) and chocolate (y) is represented by the utility function: u(x, y) = xy + x + y Suppose that now Reese loses almost his entire income, so that he is left with only one dollar, i.e. his new income is I0 = 1. If prices are still px = 2, py = 4, what is his new optimal consumption of x and y (Hint: Remember that consumption of both goods must be weakly positive, i.e. x∗ ≥ 0 and y∗ ≥ 0) (a) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 0(b) x∗ = 0.25, y∗ = 0(c) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0.25(d) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0(e) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 1
Suppose that there are only 10 individuals in the economy each with the following utility function over present and future consumption: U (c1, c2) = c1 +C2, where ci is consumption today, and c2 is consumption tomorrow. Consumption tomorrow is less valued because people are impatient and prefer consuming now rather than later. Buying 1 unit of consumption today costs $1 today and buying 1 unit of consumption tomorrow costs $1 tomorrow. All individuals have income of $10 dollars today and no income tomorrow (because they will be retired) but they can save at the market interest rater> 0. How much of his or her income will an individual consume today given that the interest rate is 0.3? O. Less than half of it O. Exactly half of it O. The individual is indifferent between consuming today and saving O. More than half of it O. All of it O. None of it How much of his or her income will an individual consume today given that the interest rate is 0.5? O. Less than half of it…
The two households will choose different consumption bundles. True, false, or undetermined?
TRUE OR FALSE. *If Marvin likes "puto bumbong" more than "bibingka" while Rey likes "bibingka" more than "puto bumbong, the marginal utility from "puto bumbong" will become zero for Rey at fewer units while the marginal utility from "puto bumbong" of Marvin will become zero at higher units of consumption.
You are trying to decide between rescuing a puppy or an older dog. You decide to try to assign some numbers to your preferences so you can compare options. You estimate that your utility for a dog that will chew your furniture is 0.1 and your utility for a dog that can go on hikes with you is 0.8. You expect that a puppy will have an 70% chance of chewing your belongings and a 90% chance of going on hikes. What is your expected utility for getting the puppy?
Assume that someone has inherited 2,000 bottles of wine from a rich uncle. He or she intends to drink these bottles over the next 40 years. Suppose that this person’s utility function for wine is given by u(c(t)) = (c(t))0.5, where c(t) is each instant t consumption of bottles. Assume also this person discounts future consumption at the rate δ = 0.05. Hence this person’s goal is to maximize 0ʃ40 e–0.05tu(c(t))dt = 0ʃ40 e–0.05t(c(t))0.5dt. Let x(t) represent the number of bottle of wine remaining at time t, constrained by x(0) = 2,000, x(40) = 0 and dx(t)/dt = – c(t): the stock of remaining bottles at each instant t is decreased by the consumption of bottles at instant t. The current value Hamiltonian expression yields: H = e–0.05t(c(t))0.5 + λ(– c(t)) + x(t)(dλ/dt). This person’s wine consumption decreases at a continuous rate of ??? percent per year. The number of bottles being consumed in the 30th year is approximately ???
Alex, who was convinced that "Football is coming home", was very excited for the World Cup last year. Unfortunately, he realized that his favourite Paul Gascoigne jersey from Euro 1996 was getting old, so he wanted to buy a new one before England's first game the following week. He could either buy a 2014 James Milner shirt from retailer A, which would make him totally happy (utility=1), or a 2006 David Beckham shirt from retailer B, which gives him a utility of 0.8. However, the shirts are not available today. There is a 50% chance that retailer A will have the shirt on the week-end, and 70% chance that retailer B will have theirs on the week-end. Due to time and work constraints, Alex can only visit one of these retailers before the tournament starts, otherwise he will have to keep his old 1996 shirt, which gives him a utility of 0.5. He can also ask his friend Nathan to check both places in the morning. But being a Welsh supporter, Nathan will not do it for free and wants some…
4. Show how to construct the reference dependent utility function for two friends Kate and Mary whose gains and losses are listed as follows : Kate's net worth is $ 4.5 million ( decreased from $ 5.5 to $ 4.5 million ) Mary's net worth $ 3.2 million ( increased from $ 3 to $ 3.2 million ) ( First determine the reference point ( use a parameter ) and then derive reference utility function for each ) .
Heather and Jeremiah both enjoy sunflower butter (s) and jelly (j) sandwiches, but they have varying preferences regarding the optimal ratio of the two. Heather prefers her sandwiches to have 6 spoonfuls of sunflower butter for every 3 scoops of jelly, whereas Jeremiah prefers 3 scoops of sunflower butter for every 5 scoops of jelly. They both would prefer as many sandwiches as possible, but derive no utility from sandwiches without their preferred ratio of s and j. A) Write down a utility function for both Heather and Jeremiah regarding consumption of s and j (U(s,j)) B) On the same graph, draw a set of indifference curves for both Heather and Jeremiah, labeling which is which. C) In addition to s and j, Heather and Jeremiah now need bread, b, to make sandwiches. Heather prefers to separate her sunflower butter and jelly and therefore uses 3 slices of bread per sandwich. Write down Heather’s utility function Uh(s,j,b) as a function of the three inputs.