Square-and-Multiply for Modular ExponentiationInput:base element xexponent H = E-o h;2' with h; E 0,1 and h; = 1and modulus n„HOutput: x" mod nInitialization: r=xAlgorithm:1FOR i =t – 1 DOWNTO 0r= r² mod n1.1IF h; = 11.2r=r•x mod nRETURN (r)

there are two kind of implementation, we can do here based in the given input is in binary or in…

Square-and-Multiply for Modular Exponentiation Input: base element x exponent H = -0 h;2' with h; € 0,1 and h; and modulus n „H Output: x4 mod n Initialization: r =x Algorithm: FOR i =t – 1 DOWNTO 0 r=r² mod n IF h; = 1 1 1.1 1.2 r = r•x mod n 2 RETURN (r)

Square-and-Multiply for Modular Exponentiation Input: base element x exponent H = -0 h;2' with h; € 0,1 and h; and modulus n „H Output: x4 mod n Initialization: r =x Algorithm: FOR i =t – 1 DOWNTO 0 r=r² mod n IF h; = 1 1 1.1 1.2 r = r•x mod n 2 RETURN (r)

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a telegraph source having two symbols, dot and dash. The dot duration is 0.2 second. The dash duration is three times the dot duration. The probability of the dot’s occurring is twice that of the dash, and the time between symbols is 0.2 second. Assume n = 2 ( 2nd extension of the code), pdash = S0 and pdot = S11. Determine the equivalent codeword for each symbol using Shannon Code. Supersymbol Code S0 S0 S0 S1 S1 S0 S1 S1 2. Determine the coding efficiency.
EXAMPLE: Kocher’s timing attacks on cryptosystems illustrate this [1084]. Kocher notes that the instructions executed by implementations of cryptosystems depend on the setting of bits in the key. For example, the algorithm in Figure 9–7 implements a fast modular exponentiation function. If a bit is 1, two multiplications occur; otherwise, one multiplication occurs. The extra multiplication takes extra time. Kocher determines bits of the confidential exponent by measuring computation time x:= 1; atmp := a; for 1 := 0 to k-1 do begin If Zi = 1 then x := (x * atmp) mod n; atmp := )atmp * atmp) mod n; end; result := x; Figure 9–7 A fast modular exponentiation routine. This routine computes x = az mod n. The bits of z are zk–1... z0. Kocher’s attack derives information about the computation from the characteristic of time. As a cryptographic key is confidential, this is a side channel attack. This is an example of a passive side channel attack, because results are derived only from…
Let an optimal prefix-free code be S if x and y are characters with frequencies f(x) and f(y) such that f(x)<f(y), then prove that b(x)>=b(y) [here "b" represents the number of bits that S uses to encode a character]
The parity problem returns 1 if the number of inputs that are 1 is even, and 0 otherwise. stepa 1: Can a perceptron algorithm learn this problem for 3 inputs? Design step2: the network and try it.Using Scikit-Learn show how the perceptron will learn this problem. step 3: using Scikit-Learn show how the multi-layer perceptron will learn this problem.
Let us define a sequence parity function as a function that takes in a sequence of binary inputs and returns a sequence indicating the number of 1’s in the input so far; specifically, if at time t the 1’s in the input so far is even it returns 1, and 0 if it is odd. For example, given input sequence [0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0], the parity sequence is [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. Implement the minimal vanilla recurrent neural network to learn the parity function. Explain your rationale using a state transition diagram and parameters of the network.
Kocher’s timing attacks on cryptosystems illustrate this [1084]. Kocher notes that the instructions executed by implementations of cryptosystems depend on the setting of bits in the key. For example, the algorithm in Figure 9–7 implements a fast modular exponentiation function. If a bit is 1, two multiplications occur; otherwise, one multiplication occurs. The extra multiplication takes extra time. Kocher determines bits of the confidential exponent by measuring computation time x:= 1; atmp := a; for 1 := 0 to k-1 do begin If Zi = 1 then x := (x * atmp) mod n; atmp := )atmp * atmp) mod n; end; result := x; Figure 9–7 A fast modular exponentiation routine. This routine computes x = az mod n. The bits of z are zk–1... z0. Kocher’s attack derives information about the computation from the characteristic of time. As a cryptographic key is confidential, this is a side channel attack. This is an example of a passive side channel attack, because results are derived only from observations. The…
Suppose we were to implement an operation in which each processor starts with an array of m words , and needs to get the global sum of the respective words in the array at each processor. We implement this operation on a ring by performing an All-to-all broadcast of all the arrays followed by a local computation of the sum of the respective elements of the array. What is the run time in terms of m, ts, and tw?
Let G be a pseudorandom generator with length function l(n) = n + 1. Define a new function H by the rule H(rx) = r||G(x) , where |r| = 2. Thus H just passes the first 2 bits of its input through untouched and applies G to the last n – 2 bits. Prove with a full reduction that H is a PRG. (You can ignore the behavior of H on inputs of length less than 2.
Cellular Automata perform distributed computation through the iteration of (relatively) simple logic within individual cells in an array. The following table defines the logic for a one-dimensional Cellular Automaton (CA): Neighbourhood: 000 001 010 011 100 101 110 111 Output bit: 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 a) Show the states of each of the cells in a ten-cell, one-dimensional CA from the given start states, following the above rule for three update cycles: 0010111010
Suppose we were to implement an operation in which each processor starts with an array of m words , and needs to get the global sum of the respective words in the array at each processor. We implement this operation on a 8-node ring by performing a Single node accumulation of the elements of the array, followed by a one-to-all broadcast of the result array. What is the run time in terms of m, ts, and tw?
In this exercise, we consider the execution of a loop in a statically scheduled superscalar processor that has full forwarding. Loop: lw $t3, 0($s1) lw $t4, 0($s2) mul $t1, $t3, $t4 add $s0, $t1, $s0 addi $s1, $s1, -8 addi $s2, $s2, -8 bne $s1, $zero, Loop Unroll this loop so that three iterations of it are done at once and schedule it for a 2-issue pipelined processor. This processor can issue one ALU/branch instruction and one lw/sw instruction each cycle. Assume that the loop always executes a number of iterations that is a multiple of 3. You can use any unused registers when changing the code to eliminate dependencies.
Write an MPI program segment for all-to-all personalized broadcast on a ring of p processors, eachprocessor Pi, 0 ≤ i ≤ p − 1, holding M(i, 0), M(i, 1), ·M(i,(p − 1)). Message M(i, j), an integer, is destinedfrom Pi to Pj . Show only the p − 1 iterative loop. Ensure proper buffer size, MPI message size, howitems are organized and ordered at the destination buffer, etc., through each loop.