Standard coefficients from multiple regression analyses for incarceration rate predicting child health outcomes in the U.S. (No omitted variables) Infant Mortality Child Mortality Incarceration rate Unemployment rates Household income Poverty rates Education level - Some Education level - None Total population N R .0879613* .0391215 -.0207576 .0248947 -.27434 .8331692 -.5902877* 30 0.9953 0.9924 343.98 Adjusted R2 F *Significant at 95% confidence level .5806432* -.1739872 -4847568 -.4188822 1.091324 -.2807465 .6726121 30 0.7188 0.5469 4.18 Teen Mortality .2183777 .0729224 .5809326 .0041706 -1.831384 -1.760656 4.471526 30 0.6517 0.4389 3.06 Pre-term Birth -.0502726 -.0054684 .0230085 -.0387071 .6161558 -.8866275* .5641498* 30 0.9971 0.9954 565.79 Low Birth Weight -.1097773 -.5404714* .2795803 .1467784 -8.587054 5.010042 .1836783 30 0.6163 0.3818 2.63

Standard coefficients from multiple regression analyses for incarceration rate predicting child health outcomes in the U.S. (No omitted variables) Infant Mortality Child Mortality Incarceration rate Unemployment rates Household income Poverty rates Education level - Some Education level - None Total population N R .0879613* .0391215 -.0207576 .0248947 -.27434 .8331692 -.5902877* 30 0.9953 0.9924 343.98 Adjusted R2 F Significant at 95% confidence level .5806432 -.1739872 -4847568 -.4188822 1.091324 -.2807465 .6726121 30 0.7188 0.5469 4.18 Teen Mortality .2183777 .0729224 .5809326 .0041706 -1.831384 -1.760656 4.471526 30 0.6517 0.4389 3.06 Pre-term Birth -.0502726 -.0054684 .0230085 -.0387071 .6161558 -.8866275* .5641498* 30 0.9971 0.9954 565.79 Low Birth Weight -.1097773 -.5404714* .2795803 .1467784 -8.587054 5.010042 .1836783 30 0.6163 0.3818 2.63

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter4A: Problems In Applying The Linear Regression Model

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Data 1:*2008 and 2013 National Demographic Health Survey showed that the percentage of womenage 15- 19 who had a live birth or is pregnant with first child had increased from 9.9% - 10.1% inthe country.*In Region 1, the percentage of women age fifteen 15 - 24 who havebegun childbearing also increased from 26% - 29%. This was attributed to the following riskybehaviors identified by the adolescents during the Regional Adolescent Congress: Early sex,Substance abuse, Pornography, VAWC (rape case), Fraternities (bad gangs) & Prostitution. Questions:1. What is the impact of the given data to mortality and morbidity rate of adolescent population? 2. What is the impact of the given data to mortality and morbidity rate of neonatal population? 3. Give at least 3 social determinants of health which are contributory factors leading to the datapresented and justify..
Y=16.8-3.9x (3.8) (1.2) The numbers 16.8 and -3.9 are the realized values for the intercept and slope (respectively) of the regression equation describing the sample, which are consistent estimators for what population parameters? The intercept and slope (respectively) of the sample determining function. The intercept and slope (respectively) of the regression equation that best fits the population. Instructions: Enter your responses rounded to three decimal places. If you are entering any negative numbers be sure to include a negative sign (-) in front of those numbers: provide a 99% confidence interval for each estimator's corresponding population parameter Intercept (----------) (----------) Slope (---------) (-------------)
In the December, 1969, American Economic Review (pp. 886-896), Nathanial Leff reports thefollowing least squares regression results for a cross section study of the effect of age composition onsavings in 74 countries in 1964:log S/Y = 7.3439 + 0.1596 log Y/N + 0.0254 log G - 1.3520 log D1 - 0.3990 log D2 (R2= 0.57)log S/N = 8.7851 + 1.1486 log Y/N + 0.0265 log G - 1.3438 log D1 - 0.3966 log D2 (R2= 0.96)where S/Y = domestic savings ratio, S/N = per capita savings, Y/N = per capita income, D1 = percentage ofthe population under 15, D2 = percentage of the population over 64, and G = growth rate of per capitaincome. Are these results correct? Explain..
Explain what is meant by an error term. What assumptions do we makeabout an error term when estimating an ordinary least squares regression?
(1) Omitted variable bias A. will always be present as long asthe regression R2 < 1 B. is suspected to exist when the estimated coefficient i different from the true population parameter. C. is suspeted to exits if the estimated coeffcient on the included independent variable changes by more than one standard error when including the omitted variable into the regression D. is suspected to exist the omitted variable is no the True population model But is coroleted with any of the included independent variables.
We know that discrimination exists. It influences wages, but also many other dimensions over the life cycle which affect wages indirectly. I run OLS regression with variables wage, age, female and degree. The dependent variable is log(wage) and we replace the variables female and degree with the interaction term. However, discrimination is not included among the observed regressors. Given that omitting confounding variables from regression model can bias the coefficient estimates, omitting discrimination would lead to biased results. Could you please help me provide an example of how unobserved gender discrimination can affect my OLS estimates. [Hint: think about ways in which discrimination can invalidate OLS assumptions.].
In 2017, Philadelphia launched a sweetened beverage tax of 1.5 cents per ounce, raising the cost of a 2-liter soda bottle from about $1.50 to $2.50. One year later, the Philadelphia mayor wants to evaluate if this "sugar tax" improves the health status of Philadelphia Propose ONE method (i.e. difference-in-difference, instrumental variables, or regression discontinuity) to address these questions. write down its implementation details (the type of data you need, potential sources to get the data, equations) its pros and cons Only Typing answer please I need ASAP
Using the regression results in column (1):a. Is the college–high school earnings difference estimated from thisregression statistically significant at the 5% level? Construct a 95%confidence interval of the difference.b. Is the male–female earnings difference estimated from this regressionstatistically significant at the 5% level? Construct a 95% confidenceinterval for the differenc(answer for me part please)
An attempt was made to evaluate the inflation rate as a predictor of the spot rate in the German treasury bill market. For a sample of 79 quarterly observations, the estimated linear regressionŷ = 0.0027 + 0.7916xwas obtained, wherey = actual change in the spot ratex = change in the spot rate predicted by the inflation rateThe coefficient of determination was 0.097, and the estimated standard deviation of the estimator of the slope of the population regression line was 0.2759.a. Interpret the slope of the estimated regression line.b. Interpret the coefficient of determination.c. Test the null hypothesis that the slope of the population regression line is 0 against the alternative that the true slope is positive, and interpret your result.d. Test, against a two-sided alternative, the null hypothesis that the slope of the population regression line is 1, and interpret your result.
Define and briefly explain the nature and structure of the following terms. Pooling of cross sections and longitudinal data
Topic: Simple Regression
Consider the following hypothetical pooled cross-sectional data of daily COVID-19 cases per 1,000 people during the early two months of the pandemic, from March to April 2020 in Ohio and 5 other neighboring states. The variable April takes value 1 if the recorded cases are from April 2020, and takes value 0 if the recorded cases are from March 2020. The variable lockdown takes value 1 if the state put in place a Stay-at-home order beginning from March 2020, and takes value 0 otherwise. Using the difference-in-differences estimator, assess the impact of the lockdown policy on daily COVID-19 cases. Table 1. Daily COVID-19 Cases by State April Cases Lockdown State Indiana 0 2 0 Indiana 1 8 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 Kentucky Kentucky Michigan Michigan Ohio 0 3 0 1 8 0 0 2 1 Ohio 1 4 1 0 4 1 1 7 1 Pennsylvania Pennsylvania West Virginia West Virginia 0 1 1 1 2 1