Suppose a state imposes a higher tax on out-of-state companies doing business in the state than it imposes clause if the only reason for the tax is to protect the local firms from out-of-state competition? in-state companies. Is this a violation of the equal protection Explain your answer thouroughly and in a manner that a person with no prior knowledge of the situation would understand it fully. For this I need more details all I can answer is .....Yes. The tax would limit the liberty of some persons (out-of-state businesses), so it is subject to a review under the equal protection clause. Protecting local businesses from out-of-state competition is not a legitimate government objective. Thus, such a tax would violate the equal protection clause.
Question: Suppose a state imposes a higher tax on out-of-state companies doing business in the state than it imposes clause if the only reason for the tax is to protect the local firms from out-of-state competition? in-state companies. Is this a violation of the equal protection
Explain your answer thouroughly and in a manner that a person with no prior knowledge of the situation would understand it fully.
For this I need more details all I can answer is .....Yes. The tax would limit the liberty of some persons (out-of-state businesses), so it is subject to a review under the equal protection clause. Protecting local businesses from out-of-state competition is not a legitimate government objective. Thus, such a tax would violate the equal protection clause.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
